commonyoshi
Smash Hero
Stay out of this, Ligolski! He's mine.
I like how you call something you know you cant win against "stupid".[/sarcasm]
I also like how you dont want to do a little research so you just say I'm guilty.[/sarcasm] Shouldn't it be your job as the accuser to actually go and find something against the one you're suspicious of? Wouldn't it be oh-so-convienent if I just went "Frozenflame is Serial Killer, guys. Let's all kill him. I dont feel like telling you why. lulz" Because that's all you're doing right now. You're whole point in suspecting me as mafia is the less than superb voting I did on Day 1. Once you realized that's how I've been playing my whole time here on Smash Boards you've got absolutely no case.
Defjam wasn't some "Oh my gosh, let me bandwagon" vote. Nor was it an "I'm bored. Kill time" vote. I honestly believed her to be independant/mafia, more than I believed Frozen to be independant/mafia, aaaand there was less of a consequence in the small chance I was on wrong on either of them. Kill Defjam when she's town? Bad. Kill Frozen when he's town? Very stupid.
Because Serial Killers+killing town=good.
There's so much more to my arguement against him than this small, circumstantial fact. Perhaps you need to go back and read my posts against him. You probably turned a blind eye because your suspicion of me clouded your mind.
And I've already made my case against him. I could quote it for you. Repeating the same mesage over and over just doesn't seem necessary. I'll do so right now.
Of course it does. People have their little ways of playing. KevinM, from what I've seen from past mafia games, doesn't post all that much. Does that mean he's a mafia-lurker because he hasn't done so much this game either? No. Gotmink is fairly innactive. If he does it in this game, then he must be another lurker as well, right? I'm not saying you should just give those people free rides. You do, however, need to have more points against them than their small quirks.I think metagaming is stupid and I'm not going to take the time to research an entirely different game just to find out something that might not even apply. Just because someone has a history of voting without any reasoning doesn't make it not-scummy.
I like how you call something you know you cant win against "stupid".[/sarcasm]
I also like how you dont want to do a little research so you just say I'm guilty.[/sarcasm] Shouldn't it be your job as the accuser to actually go and find something against the one you're suspicious of? Wouldn't it be oh-so-convienent if I just went "Frozenflame is Serial Killer, guys. Let's all kill him. I dont feel like telling you why. lulz" Because that's all you're doing right now. You're whole point in suspecting me as mafia is the less than superb voting I did on Day 1. Once you realized that's how I've been playing my whole time here on Smash Boards you've got absolutely no case.
Once again you admit the only thing you find scummy about me was stuff I did on Day 1. >_> Well I already explained myself for my votes, which I will admit was a bad move on my part, but I will clearly state this. I regret nothing with Defjam. Did I make myself clear? I dont regret voting against her other than the fact that she ended up being town. If the same situation came up again, I'd do the same.No. My point is you were showing suspicions of Frozen for most of Day 1, and none for Defjam. As soon as a bandwagon started on Defjam you jumped right on. This along with your careless votes for Dark_Ermac make you look scummy.
Defjam wasn't some "Oh my gosh, let me bandwagon" vote. Nor was it an "I'm bored. Kill time" vote. I honestly believed her to be independant/mafia, more than I believed Frozen to be independant/mafia, aaaand there was less of a consequence in the small chance I was on wrong on either of them. Kill Defjam when she's town? Bad. Kill Frozen when he's town? Very stupid.
I thought it was pretty obvious. I criticized your sense of approach and style.Er, not at all. My point was you were attacking Frozen to get heat off of Tails. That seems logical, right? Then you say I'm a hypocrite for doing the same thing, yet you think Frozen is the SK. I'm not following you.
Your points against Frozen just don't make him look like the SK, why would the SK go out of his way to try and get the double voter killed? It just doesn't make sense to me.
There's so much more to my arguement against him than this small, circumstantial fact. Perhaps you need to go back and read my posts against him. You probably turned a blind eye because your suspicion of me clouded your mind.
Ok, let me ask you a question. Assuming I am mafia, why then am I attacking Frozen?I don't see how that would effect it at all.
I can handle that you aren't convinced by my points against Frozen, but your whole "maybe you've got outside info because you're mafia, hur hur hur" was just bad.I don't see how your reasoning makes Frozen the SK. You seem so certain that Frozen is our SK, but I'm not seeing what makes it so obvious. It appears like you have some outside information that would lead you to believe he is the SK, something the mafia would be able to figure out. Let me ask you this, what has Frozen done that makes you so sure Frozen is the SK?
And I've already made my case against him. I could quote it for you. Repeating the same mesage over and over just doesn't seem necessary. I'll do so right now.