Marthmaster92
Smash Champion
Oh poor mario,
Rescuing Peach from Goombas,
Bowser never dies.
Rescuing Peach from Goombas,
Bowser never dies.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Saying no lynch is suspicious? That seems reasonable when there is nothing we can do right now.frozenflame751 said:This really was a bad time to put a time limit on day one, seeing as how a whole bunvh of players are still gone on trips and have limited computer access, hence their lurking.
Anyway, at the moment skylink is looking the most suspicious to me. First he says that voting no lynch is NOT an option. Why not? If we have a deadlined day one and we haven't rooted out someone with strong mafia tells, then why shouldn't we voet no lynch? Voting no lynch is the best thign to do when a good choice for a lynch hasn't been found, because a random lynch definately will not help the town in any way.
Secondly, he's already jumped around with his suspicions three times, first he votes SideEffect, then he more or less FOS's everyone on the small marshigio bandwagon, and then he votes TahjMach because in his one post he sais he didn't want to get bandwagoned for lurking like Marshigio. I don't find anything scummy about that.
So, which what little I have to go with, I think my vote is best placed on Skylink at the moment. Vote: Skylink
I already mentioned this. Voting no lynch costs the town a life from the mafia nightkill, the sereal Killer attack, the numerous town players in the game with swords, lances, and axes, as well as any other abilities, that, since the town is the majority, will be targeted on the town.frozenflame751 said:Anyway, at the moment skylink is looking the most suspicious to me. First he says that voting no lynch is NOT an option. Why not? If we have a deadlined day one and we haven't rooted out someone with strong mafia tells, then why shouldn't we vote no lynch? Voting no lynch is the best thign to do when a good choice for a lynch hasn't been found, because a random lynch definately will not help the town in any way.
Oh please, that is not vote hopping. And I have plenty of reason for all of them.frozenflame751 said:Secondly, he's already jumped around with his suspicions three times, first he votes SideEffect, then he more or less FOS's everyone on the small marshigio bandwagon, and then he votes TahjMach because in his one post he sais he didn't want to get bandwagoned for lurking like Marshigio. I don't find anything scummy about that.
So, which what little I have to go with, I think my vote is best placed on Skylink at the moment. Vote: Skylink
Well, that is pretty much crap. Im not going to look through all the pages to look for rules. Sucks Im on vacation and cant defend my favorite stage as well.
So what if he hasn't returned yet...we all have busy lives...Your reasoning is flawed and therefore my vote stays for now...tahj-mach Votes: 1
This suspect the last poster who voted marshigo, and has not posted or removed his post since, even though Marshigo returned a few pages ago.
ixnay's right, we can't no-lynch, that'll get us no where.ixnayonthehombre said:I guess that for the time being, I'm opposed to a no-lynch. Thedocsalive, JamesSparrow and Kirbyphreak know how well that went last time...
What are the reasons for voting marshigio? Really, the only one was him being inactive. And he really hasn't been anymore.marshigio said:You're voting me just because I have the 2nd most votes?
The chances of him being so-called "suspicious" are slim to none. The real people we should be looking at are the people who vote as bandwagoners without a reason, and vote hoppers, a la the people who bandwagon on marshigio just because he is the leading vote-getter. There really is no reason to vote marshigio.marshigio said:4 people voting for me when I didn't even post was a little strange, especially TahjMach's reaction.
I'm still not sure who to vote for yet, but there are a few who seem suspicious.
You know what that means? The person we are voting out is the person with the most number of votes, meaning marshigio. We are voting out a guy for no reason other than the fact that he was formerly inactive, which is valid enough, until he returns. Let's look at tahj, pez and others who bandwagon on for no reason other than randomness. These lurkers are the real peole we whould be inquiring about.thedocsalive said:Oh, and deadline is apparently July 11th at 10:15 p.m. EST. That's exactly four days after we started.
I'm new too.TahjMach said:I'm new to mafia, please give me a break.
I agree, let's see the results so far.TahjMach said:Can I get an updated vote count?
Actually, no, that's not what most mafia do. They are usually the ones that try to create suspicion on others. Becuase no one can trust anyone, or know anything for sure, then someone can always spin something to make someone look suspicious. I did it in the first one, the mafia did in in the second game, and I actually didn't read the others, but they probally did it there too.Skylink said:THOSE ACCUSATIONS HOLD NO WATER AND THEIR VOTES HOLD! THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE MAFIA DOES!!
Actually you're wrong here in a few ways. First of all, sideeffect wasn't vote hoping; he voted TahjMach and then he voted for you. Secondly, you changed your suspicions 4 times, first a vote on bahamut, then on SideEffect, then the pseudo-FOS's, then a vote on TahjMach. It doesn't matter if you have a reason for all of your votes or not, it's still vote hopping and it's still kinda scummy IMO.Skylink said:Skylink 4 votes (i think?)
Yes, I'm sure this is the part you have been waiting to read. This suspect is known for the mostly the same as SideEffect; vote hopping. He Voted SideEffect at the start, then FOSd the three that folowed th doc's suspicion on the Marshigo, then votes tahj-mach. However, in all honest opinion, this is not vote hopping. I FOSd two and voted two. And they both had reason.
Wrong again. Voting no lynch has a chance to SAVE the town a life. The way you say voting no lynch cause the town to lose lives, you make it sound as if you forgot that night still happens if we actually lynch someone. The nightkills are going to happen whether or not we lynch someone. Voting no lynch is actually reducing the number of deaths by one, but it also eliminates our chance to get a scummy during the day. Not that I still want a no-lynch, seeing as how the game is picking up, but the reaosning I wa strying to explain earlier, is that it is better to sacrifice our chance to get a mafia member that day to save what would most likely be a townie from being lynched that day, seeing as how mathematical odds and a lack of time for discussion make a townie lynch much more likely. And the vote-hopping thing I've already explained.Skylink said:I already mentioned this. Voting no lynch costs the town a life from the mafia nightkill, the sereal Killer attack, the numerous town players in the game with swords, lances, and axes, as well as any other abilities, that, since the town is the majority, will be targeted on the town.Oh please, that is not vote hopping. And I have plenty of reason for all of them.
Bad idea. You can't have the deciding factor of a lynch simply be who has mre time to devote to the game. A tie should be broken by lynching whomever reached the number of votes they possess at the time of the deadline first. (That's how it's usually done in games elsewhere on the net.)camo-man said:If the votes on two people are equal at the deadline, the one that posted the most recently will be spared. Just don't turn this into a spamfest. Any other suggestions would be appreciated.
Sure.ligolski said:maybe you could quote for me the instances where he did the above mentioned to make it a little clearer for me
Skylink said:a-HA!! I definitly sense some mafia here.
If you look at thedoc's offence on Marshigo, he said nothing on him other than he has not contributed yet. However, I can see three people that just voted him even though I do believe I just posted a better Idea that doc was asking someone to offer. I'm not going to vote any of you guys, but keep this one im mind later in the game.
Sinz expresses suspicion relating to the four votes on an inactive player, agreeing with Skylink.Sinz two posts later said:whoa. mafia sense is tingling. 4 votes just on an inavtive? something is wrong there.
So far my only guess would be peza for not giving a reason for his votes.
no vote yet.
frozenflame751 said:This really was a bad time to put a time limit on day one, seeing as how a whole bunvh of players are still gone on trips and have limited computer access, hence their lurking.
Anyway, at the moment skylink is looking the most suspicious to me. First he says that voting no lynch is NOT an option. Why not? If we have a deadlined day one and we haven't rooted out someone with strong mafia tells, then why shouldn't we voet no lynch? Voting no lynch is the best thign to do when a good choice for a lynch hasn't been found, because a random lynch definately will not help the town in any way.
Secondly, he's already jumped around with his suspicions three times, first he votes SideEffect, then he more or less FOS's everyone on the small marshigio bandwagon, and then he votes TahjMach because in his one post he sais he didn't want to get bandwagoned for lurking like Marshigio. I don't find anything scummy about that.
So, which what little I have to go with, I think my vote is best placed on Skylink at the moment. Vote: Skylink
So he clearly agrees with Skylink's reasoning earlier, and here agrees with frozen's reasons for voting Skylink, when Sinz himself is guilty of this reasoning. Now, I know palyers are allowed to change their minds in this game, but this is a pretty quick turnaround with little in-between from Skylink that could change his mind.Sinz said:I think you've got it Frozen. Those are valid reasons, I support them.
vote:skylink
What? Votehopping with reasons can certainly be a good thing, especially on day one. We don't want the focus to be on only a few players, as we don't gain as many reactions.frozenflame751 said:It doesn't matter if you have a reason for all of your votes or not, it's still vote hopping and it's still kinda scummy IMO.
I've also seen double lynches, or a coinflip. I think I also saw no lynch once, but that was kinda stupid.frozenflame751 said:Bad idea. You can't have the deciding factor of a lynch simply be who has mre time to devote to the game. A tie should be broken by lynching whomever reached the number of votes they possess at the time of the deadline first. (That's how it's usually done in games elsewhere on the net.)
I post ideas. Whether or not people choose to follow is up to them. I tried voting a lurker early on, and some people followed. More recently I've voted Sinz, and I'm alone on that one.Bahamut said:Anywho, I've looked back on the whole day and I've decided that thedocsalive is doing an incredibly good job leading the town around by its nose.
I don't really have any good reasons for voting you, but I don't really have any good reasons for voting anyone else. Anytime some suspicion is raised, it is foiled...I voted you in hopes that you'd be lynched. It will at least give us a chance to see(if only in these last 24 hours when discussion is picking up)what impact the lynched person had on the people in this game, the people who were working together with him, ect. I just want a lynch, and you're the easiest way to get it at the moment.I think this is it anyway. ixnayonthehombre has NO good reason why I should be lynched