To all of the people responding with 'Well it depends on your morality and sex is bad and you might make baby angels cry and...' -- the man isn't having a moral dilemma.
He didn't say that he was debating the importance of his chastity. He asked which was better: Smash or sex. I have had plenty of both lately, and I'm gonna have to say sex. By a longshot. Hell the fact that it is potentially 'only' a one-night stand makes the deal even sweeter. He's then guaranteed time to use the old "Yeah that was nice... but I have an appointment today..." and go have himself some Denny's and play Brawl in the morning.
Moreover, to the yay virgin camp - there's nothing wrong with wanting your first time to be with someone special. I suppose that's commendable, especially with kids these days doing it befor ethey even have their adult bits. However, if you wait too long to have sex, you're dealing with two very real problems later on. One would be repression causing all sorts of psychological issues (you'll end up being into some bizarre ****, no doubt.)
Two is the fact that you may marry a girl, ride off into the sunset for your honeymoon, and then when you finally do sleep together, you find that there is no sexual chemistry to be had. Then what?
Cupie doll stares and ****** kisses are all fun in the land of rubbing knees and holding hands, but what if you finally do make things a little more X-rated and you're both terrible at it? Or you're a premature ejaculator? Or she has a terribly odorous patch? Have fun sorting that out and subsequently adding to the nearly 60% modern divorce rate.
So... yeah. No. It's not that avoiding pre-marital sex has lost it's "value" - it's just that society is no longer ignorant to it's detriments. Think smoking in the 50's versus smoking today. If you want to do it still, then great - your call, chief. But a lot of people know at least a few very good reasons why it's just not bright.