deepseadiva
Bodybuilding Magical Girl
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Why did I find this funny...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Why did I find this funny...
I've been playing it since I late 2009.I stopped playing theory fighter years ago
Except that's really bad theorycraft.this thread can be summed up by reading any couple pages on any tier list thread.
IDK about this susa........SAN may say different
No person on this entire forum would argue for a moment that you could jab your opponent to death. It's stupidity at it's best to even suggest that.
:leek:
He understands that it takes a little bit more than that to win as Ike.IDK about this susa........SAN may say different
No. Your theorycraft is perfectly valid and fine until placed into practice. You don't ever seem to factor in the human variable.I wrote the book on good theory craft.
Someone call for me?Leave it to you guys to turn something so simple into rocket science.
lol. For example? Plz tell me you aren't talking about the Marth vs Pika stuff. Cuz I'm not even theory crafting. I'm more or less regurgitating what other Pika mains have said.No. Your theorycraft is perfectly valid and fine until placed into practice. You don't ever seem to factor in the human variable.
But that's just from all the arguments I've read of yours recently.
:leek:
Do I really have to go digging through your posts? Don't take it too heavily as a personal attack. It's just my observations of what you do, and you tend to leave out the human factor to a large degree.lol. For example? Plz tell me you aren't talking about the Marth vs Pika stuff. Cuz I'm not even theory crafting. I'm more or less regurgitating what other Pika mains have said.
I wouldn't say everything I learned was from data, but major breakthroughs and how I broke down the game was just from theorycraft and I am pleased to know that words I used to describe things caught on. Ledge traps is one in particular, and that was just based on spacing and just straight up knowing that by putting yourself at the edge at a certain distance alot of chars were either screwed or extremely limited.That's why theorycrafting is a messy art, and there is a point in which you cannot rely on it.
That being said, everything I've nearly learned about Brawl has been data from the game (note: not tournaments.. I'm talking actual game data like frames and physics) or from theorycrafting.
I don't learn ANYTHING by watching a video... unless it's an instructional on how to perform an AT or something...
:leek:
D'awwww <33333i came in expecting a rubbish OP
but OP was good
and the rubbish was most people in this thread
good shee
im out
Agreed. Again, I'm not saying you're a ****ty theorycrafter. You just go overboard sometimes.I wouldn't say everything I learned was from data, but major breakthroughs and how I broke down the game was just from theorycraft and I am pleased to know that words I used to describe things caught on. Ledge traps is one in particular, and that was just based on spacing and just straight up knowing that by putting yourself at the edge at a certain distance alot of chars were either screwed or extremely limited.
You gave no supporting evidence, and only stated the result of your theorycraft. That's not really a problem in itself, but everyone will question as to how you reached that conclusion.Theory craft is great. As long as you aren't using it as your main evidence in an argument.
For example:
ME: I think D3 vs. Iceclimbers is in ICies favor but not by a huge amount
Someone else: Nah this is totally unwinnable, Ice climbers can just blizzard camp and set up frame traps and D3 can't do anything about it.
They're generalizing their theory craft and have made up the match up in their head even though their version of the match up doesn't actually exist. That's bad theory craft.
Theory craft is great for expanding the metagame. You come up with your theory craft and then you test it out and try to do it in friendlies to see if it actually works
He was doing a post 'not writing a book' SuSa.Theory craft is great. As long as you aren't using it as your main evidence in an argument.
For example:
ME: I think D3 vs. Iceclimbers is in ICies favor but not by a huge amount
Someone else: Nah this is totally unwinnable, Ice climbers can just blizzard camp and set up frame traps and D3 can't do anything about it.
They're generalizing their theory craft and have made up the match up in their head even though their version of the match up doesn't actually exist. That's bad theory craft.
Theory craft is great for expanding the metagame. You come up with your theory craft and then you test it out and try to do it in friendlies to see if it actually works
No, you're just taking it personally. AC is just calling theorycrafting useless, not you.Uhm.... explain AC?
I really am refusing to bring up year-old examples. I've won games entirely based upon my own theorycraft. Theorycrafting has proven to work for me.
So calling it useless is a personal attack as to how I play thispiece of ****game.