Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Is confused how my named changed to Zero Soul...Definitely agree on Risen, Space Pirates and Ing.
Klump (DKC)
Aparoids (Star Fox)
Irridescent Flint?Glint beetle (assuming we don't already have one) (pikmin)
something from pac man world
mechon (xenoblade)
new age retro hippe (Earthbound)
Optimus Prime is a choice equally as ridiculous as Goku. Saying he is more likely than Geno is just plain foolish.
This is probably the 100th time i've deleted the "]" when editing a quote. . . FixedIs confused how my named changed to Zero Soul...
Geno is a ****ing video game character.
Doesn't need to be a video game character, just needs to have significant history with video games, and last I checked, Transformers do.
Uh I'd rather talk about why I have funded Indivisible
I come back after a short hiatus, and this is the conversation.
Considering that he's actually appeared in first-party Nintendo titles in some capacity, I'd say he is more likely than Goku. Granted, it's not incredibly likely...but this isn't about incredibly likely, this is about if it's feasible or not.
Optimus Prime hasn't been neglected by his owners for over a decade at this point, either. Give me solid evidence that Geno is more likely and I'll concede my point, but until then I can continue to say my opinion.
Toys are not Manga...
An utterly irrelevant one who is neglected by both parent companies in favor of much more profitable ideas. Big whoop. Considering how little Geno is used, I'd hazard to say he's pretty much dead in the water as far as a playable fighter goes.
I can't and I won't stop people from bringing up a topic, as long as they are willing to discuss it in a civil manner.
No he didn't.
Reminder that that's a mistranslation.
That is really just your perspective.
Thanks for clearing that up, Regi.
I appreciate your liberal stance here Falkoopa(or should I say Dr. Falkoopa now), but it's sad that the ridiculous suggestion you came up with is no less likely than Optimus Prime. In fact; more likely because Miis.If you want to talk about, say, Napoleon wearing a hoodie and wielding a bazooka in Smash, go straight ahead.
pupNapoleon
on a second Square Enix character. I could totally see Lara Croft.
Has Takamaru made a huge impact in video games? Has Lip made a huge impact in video games? Postulating questions as a way to discuss isn't exactly fair as a debate method. Of course not everyone's going to have a massive impact in video games as a whole, but there are instances where franchises can get in by other means than just impact on the medium; otherwise, we wouldn't have Dark Pit and the Ice Climbers. Doesn't stop people from supporting them and arguing that they're possible. The only real difference is that Prime isn't a Nintendo character.
Look... I get that you feel attacked, but until certain truths are held accountable by the Geno side, there will be no credibility to the Geno argument. As absurdly as you feel about Dora, many may feel about the responses you are giving.
I dont think I'm alone in saying- its not a matter of being against Geno, its a matter of the futile argument you are presenting, which denies reality. I go against majority of the mass opinion in this thread all the time- but I'd like to believe I stand my ground by providing an opinion based on actual evidence. Things like this-
Are one of the very few points in this speculation scene we can actually say are 100 percent incorrect. Ownership of a character is not an opinion. He may be given a mushroom symbol in the reality you envision for the character- fine. But he is not owned by Nintendo. It isn't a fan made category, it isnt based on precedent to be broken. It is just a fact. No one, not me nor you, not Anna and not Oni, not anyone on this board, gets an opinion on this being truth, because it isnt subjective. Esto es un hecho,
Anything can happen!
I never thought I'd find a subject of debate more monotonous and futile than the Ridley shadow theories.
That's a very unrealistic amount of content.
He was popular. Back during the Brawl speculation days, he was unquestionably one of the most wanted characters among the Smash community.
*looks at Source Gaming's article about third-parties*
facts? nope there is no proof that this would be impossible to happen, it wouldnt hurt if we get 2 characters from square enix.
Why is it always about Genos likeliness? It's like we can't discuss Geno without someone throwing shade on him, he isn't any more or less likely than every other character left to addSMRPG is one of the best Mario RPGs, yes, but that doesn't mean Geno is the only way to have it represented. Mario was the main character of the game, not Geno. SMRPG has some representation in Smash already; see Peach's moveset.
If a heavy hitter like K. Rool is having such a hard time despite having so much support before SSB4's release, what makes Geno likely again?
Then just add Black Mage who has appeared in more Mario games then Geno.
SuperNintendoDisney
Because people keep bringing up this excuse of a Mario character over characters that have a role in more than one game.
Geno Boost
I guess I shouldn't have brought that up. Fair enough.
Tbh it is obvious, but I like entertaining ideas.
It's not impossible, no.
Nope, he's as likely as every other character.
Maybe it's because this discussion has been going on for over ten pages now even though he "isn't any more or less likely than every other character left to add"
Already wearing a hoodie, but I have no idea where to find a Bazooka...
The history you mention is a very minuscule one. SMPRG is just one game among the plenty of critically acclaimed Mario games, and one that isn't remembered all that much, unfortunately.
