Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
When was the last time Tingle was in a game other than Warriors?I kinda feel like the ship has sailed on Tingle but after Ganon and Impa he’s probably the most notable character left in the franchise.
Mainline game-wise, Minish Cap, but he had two DS spin-offs in 2006 and 2009 respectively. Tingle is probably a lost cause unless he somehow gets a K. Rool-level campaign behind him.When was the last time Tingle was in a game other than Warriors?
Skull Kid is only notable in the context of Majora's Mask being critically acclaimed and beloved by fans, not how the character is portrayed in the actual franchise. The game also wasn't really a "major" title upon release, at least in the context of the Zelda series and the N64; it didn't even hit the top 10 N64 titles in units sold. When the game came out it didn't have the reputation it does now; it took years of re-evaluation and revisiting for it to have that sort of clout. I say this as someone who has Majora's Mask as his favorite Zelda games and in his top 10 on a good day.Majora's Mask was major and Skull Kid was playable in Warriors so I'd say he's notable as well (not to mention the Mask makes an appearance in ALBW, and the Skull Kid in TP may or may not be the same one or a descendant).
Wow lol its like you took all the things I think about Skull Kid and put them down but better. I mean I still love the guy and think he'd be fun, but people seriously overplay his importance.Mainline game-wise, Minish Cap, but he had two DS spin-offs in 2006 and 2009 respectively. Tingle is probably a lost cause unless he somehow gets a K. Rool-level campaign behind him.
Skull Kid is only notable in the context of Majora's Mask being critically acclaimed and beloved by fans, not how the character is portrayed in the actual franchise. The game also wasn't really a "major" title upon release, at least in the context of the Zelda series and the N64; it didn't even hit the top 10 N64 titles in units sold. When the game came out it didn't have the reputation it does now; it took years of re-evaluation and revisiting for it to have that sort of clout. I say this as someone who has Majora's Mask as his favorite Zelda games and in his top 10 on a good day.
As for Skull Kid himself, he's an NPC antagonist without a proper boss fight who can only be said to definitively appear in one mainline title. Most of his importance comes from fan support, not his legacy within the Zelda IP. Nothing separates him from characters like Ghirahim or Zant other than popularity.
No arguments there, and while I don't think Warriors will probably factor into anything as far as Smash is concerned I think it does show who Nintendo thinks are popular Zelda characters.I mean, I know Skull Kid is basically a one-off, but it is at least canon that he's the same Skull Kid you play Saria's Song to in Ocarina of Time, and he came back in Warriors (even if it took another release or something).
I realize he's not really important outside of MM...I guess I just like him 'cause of his personality, design, and the whole forest thing.
well if they are making another zelda whatever it is i will get itSo just to kick off some Zelda related speculation, what does everyone think the rumored Zelda project coming next year is?
I've heard rumors that they might be porting ALBW to Switch or that it will use the BotW engine again similar to MM and OoT (which also had two years between them). Sounds like the only thing deconfirmed is that it is not a SS port.
And then to bring it back to Smash, how could this effect DLC (if at all)?
So just to kick off some Zelda related speculation, what does everyone think the rumored Zelda project coming next year is?
I've heard rumors that they might be porting ALBW to Switch or that it will use the BotW engine again similar to MM and OoT (which also had two years between them). Sounds like the only thing deconfirmed is that it is not a SS port.
And then to bring it back to Smash, how could this effect DLC (if at all)?
I feel like the most likely thing is BotW 2 ala MM like you mentioned. It's too soon for any entirely new Zelda game, and with how amazingly well received BotW was, it'd be criminal to not use the engine again. If that is the case (I hope to god it is) then we could be seeing a BotW character in Smash? Whether it's from actual BotW, or a new character for the sequel, it'd be a good way to promote it. One of the Champions being in Smash has always been a good idea in my book. Urbosa or Mipha seem like the best choices, especially if they continue to have a prominent role in the next game.So just to kick off some Zelda related speculation, what does everyone think the rumored Zelda project coming next year is?
I've heard rumors that they might be porting ALBW to Switch or that it will use the BotW engine again similar to MM and OoT (which also had two years between them). Sounds like the only thing deconfirmed is that it is not a SS port.
And then to bring it back to Smash, how could this effect DLC (if at all)?
It always surprises me how many girls are on this website other than me, I'm not used to that when talking about smash lmao. Welcome to the club, sister.I'm a massive ghirahim fangirl, and honestly, if ghirahim can't be playable, then I'd rather not have any new zelda character be playable. None of them are any more deserving of getting in than him, so having one make the cut would be like rubbing salt in the wound.
I'm dreading smash 6, when we inevitably get some zelda representative I don't care about, thereby applying aforementioned salt.
id always pictured them in the totem form all the timeMy idea for Tri Force Heroes Link Trio.
They are kind of like Ice Climbers and they follow each other and follow up each others hits but thesse combos are not hard to escape. Their final smash is a triple tri force slash
I don't think it will outside a few promotional spirits. Reggie implied the DLC would be third party.So just to kick off some Zelda related speculation, what does everyone think the rumored Zelda project coming next year is?
I've heard rumors that they might be porting ALBW to Switch or that it will use the BotW engine again similar to MM and OoT (which also had two years between them). Sounds like the only thing deconfirmed is that it is not a SS port.
And then to bring it back to Smash, how could this effect DLC (if at all)?
I don't think he actually implied anything about 3rd party. He just said Joker is a good indicator for the direction they're going in, which could mean any number of things.I don't think it will outside a few promotional spirits. Reggie implied the DLC would be third party.
They will be in it for specialsid always pictured them in the totem form all the time
Genuinely think Smash 6 will come and go without a Zelda newcomer unless the fans rally behind one character, like K. Rool and Ridley fans.I'm a massive ghirahim fangirl, and honestly, if ghirahim can't be playable, then I'd rather not have any new zelda character be playable. None of them are any more deserving of getting in than him, so having one make the cut would be like rubbing salt in the wound.
I'm dreading smash 6, when we inevitably get some zelda representative I don't care about, thereby applying aforementioned salt.
LoZ / ALttP / Oracles games / ALBW Ganon fans rise upGenuinely think Smash 6 will come and go without a Zelda newcomer unless the fans rally behind one character, like K. Rool and Ridley fans.
This timline that you describe would be perfectImagine if Zelda got as many reps as Fire Emblem every game. That would be the best timeline.
if onlyImagine if Zelda got as many reps as Fire Emblem every game. That would be the best timeline.
Because Skull Kid and Chrom would totally take up the same amount of time and resources.It's pretty sad how wanting a newcomer from Zelda, one of Nintendo's biggest IPs, after 17 years of nothing feels like I'm asking for characters like Shrek or Spongebob. I feel stupid for ever thinking Skull Kid had a chance with Sakurai running things. Gotta make sure Marth get's another playable skin added instead.
He probably would actually considering Sakurai's penchant for making Zelda villains clones of space racers.Because Skull Kid and Chrom would totally take up the same amount of time and resources.
We only have one space racer on the roster, though... but now I have the mental image of Skull Kid throwing a Falcon Punch where the Moon flies out of his fist and clocks some poor sucker right in the face. I can't stop laughing, send help.He probably would actually considering Sakurai's penchant for making Zelda villains clones of space racers.
Yeah well see if you can keep laughing after 17 years x(We only have one space racer on the roster, though... but now I have the mental image of Skull Kid throwing a Falcon Punch where the Moon flies out of his fist and clocks some poor sucker right in the face. I can't stop laughing, send help.
We only have one space racer on the roster, though... but now I have the mental image of Skull Kid throwing a Falcon Punch where the Moon flies out of his fist and clocks some poor sucker right in the face. I can't stop laughing, send help.
Yeah well see if you can keep laughing after 17 years x(
That's a good list and all, but spirits don't disconfirm characters.I compiled a quick list of characters I want that haven't been explicitly deconfirmed via Spiriting.
View attachment 184122
Vaati and Ganon's there since multiple incarnations are fair game. (Also I'm just surprised that 2D Ganon isn't a Spirit. Seriously, give K Rool a Staff and make him spam Side B and you'll have a perfectly good representation of 2D Ganon swinging and tossing his trident. It's even more glaring since Zelda's based on her classic design and Aghanim is a Spirit)
I don't think we can actually say one way or the other until we start seeing DLC roll in.That's a good list and all, but spirits don't disconfirm characters.
Nobody is, really. Personally I don't expect any first party characters.Don't be expecting the DLC to have any Zelda characters in it either btw.
We can't say anything for sure really, but considering the overwhelming evidence that says Spirits mean almost nothing is a little ridiculous. Pit (original) is a spirit, not a fighter spirit. Any spirit already in the game could easily get parentheses added to it if necessary, and even if the character only has one appearance or one concept art, it's not like fighter spirits have to be concept art. Pokemon Trainer and Cloud don't have concept art for their fighter spirits. Trophies didn't disconfirm characters back in Smash 4, why should Spirits do that now? They don't even have to remove the spirits with stats or cause any problems, because the Mewtwo/Lucas trophy never got removed or even renamed either.I don't think we can actually say one way or the other until we start seeing DLC roll in.
Wii Fit Trainer's Fighter Spirit is also the Smash render.We can't say anything for sure really, but considering the overwhelming evidence that says Spirits mean almost nothing is a little ridiculous. Pit (original) is a spirit, not a fighter spirit. Any spirit already in the game could easily get parentheses added to it if necessary, and even if the character only has one appearance or one concept art, it's not like fighter spirits have to be concept art. Pokemon Trainer and Cloud don't have concept art for their fighter spirits. Trophies didn't disconfirm characters back in Smash 4, why should Spirits do that now? They don't even have to remove the spirits with stats or cause any problems, because the Mewtwo/Lucas trophy never got removed or even renamed either.
He said about Smash no longer being just Nintendo and being a celebration of gaming as a whole, that sounds like 3rd party to me.I don't think he actually implied anything about 3rd party. He just said Joker is a good indicator for the direction they're going in, which could mean any number of things.
I read that article. I think the quote was taken out of context for clickbait and he said practically nothing about 3rd party possibilities.He said about Smash no longer being just Nintendo and being a celebration of gaming as a whole, that sounds like 3rd party to me.
Where was this said? I've seen the quote before, but where is the soure? I need it for full closure of my hopes.I don't think it will outside a few promotional spirits. Reggie implied the DLC would be third party.
Rondo Of Blood got an SNES "port" called Dracula X. He's also in Portrait Of Ruin.Richter never appeared on a Nintendo system either....