Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
nice to know not everyone hates tingleTingle and Skull Kid are tied for me. I'd love to see both of them.
Zelda really deserves another character in Smash. We haven't really gotten a new feeling Zelda character since Melee. Its way past time we got a new one.
I don't personally hate Tingle either, I just think putting him in Smash would be a bad idea because of the people who do VEHEMENTLY hate him. Imagine all the hate Piranha Plant got, then combine that with Bayonetta, then combine that with Corrin. That's basically what Tingle would be in the US.nice to know not everyone hates tingle
I will say, Sak has guts to treat him the way he does in Smash.I don't personally hate Tingle either, I just think putting him in Smash would be a bad idea because of the people who do VEHEMENTLY hate him. Imagine all the hate Piranha Plant got, then combine that with Bayonetta, then combine that with Corrin. That's basically what Tingle would be in the US.
poor guy, only the middle of those three really deserved it. i mean the other two, corrin's main problem was how over represented fire emblem had become, and his bland personality and pp it was mostly how salty and entitled the waluigi fans have becomeI don't personally hate Tingle either, I just think putting him in Smash would be a bad idea because of the people who do VEHEMENTLY hate him. Imagine all the hate Piranha Plant got, then combine that with Bayonetta, then combine that with Corrin. That's basically what Tingle would be in the US.
I'm not a Waluigi and I still despise the Plant's inclusion. But that's off topic.poor guy, only the middle of those three really deserved it. i mean the other two, corrin's main problem was how over represented fire emblem had become, and his bland personality and pp it was mostly how salty and entitled the waluigi fans have become
Corrin was from a game that hadn't released in the US yet, and also was a character that FE fans eventually came to hate when the game did come out. Even ignoring the blind hate for any and all FE reps, Corrin was just a terrible choice to put in Smash.poor guy, only the middle of those three really deserved it. i mean the other two, corrin's main problem was how over represented fire emblem had become, and his bland personality and pp it was mostly how salty and entitled the waluigi fans have become
Hate him or love him, he'd be so funny in Smash. After seeing the cartoony ways he attacks in hyrule warriors, I've thought he would be hilarious in Smash. Plus, he's got his own series of games and is one of the few recurring Zelda characters that appears in multiple entries.nice to know not everyone hates tingle
fairI'm not a Waluigi and I still despise the Plant's inclusion. But that's off topic.
well im still pretty new to the fe fandom i didnt realise he was so hated, i just didnt like them cause theyre so bland which i chocked up to being an avatarCorrin was from a game that hadn't released in the US yet, and also was a character that FE fans eventually came to hate when the game did come out. Even ignoring the blind hate for any and all FE reps, Corrin was just a terrible choice to put in Smash.
As cool as Piranha Plant's moveset is... I think the hate was pretty justified. It's not just Waluigi fans either, really anyone that wanted a Mario Character was mad about it. Toad/Captain Toad too, or any of the Mario RPG characters like Geno. Piranha Plant just felt like a punch in the gut no matter who you wanted in Smash.
I’d love to know, why do people hate on Bayonetta’s inclusion? She made absolute sense to me, considering Nintendo essentially saved her franchise, allowing them to keep her on as an exclusive. Plus wasn’t she the top request on the fighter ballot in the EU?poor guy, only the middle of those three really deserved it. i mean the other two, corrin's main problem was how over represented fire emblem had become, and his bland personality and pp it was mostly how salty and entitled the waluigi fans have become
the thing about the ballot though is that it game everyone endless votes and true they said it was more a suggestion box than a popularity poll but still the nature of it will make you suspicious of the results especially when the so called top choice is a character who didnt seem to have much support in the fandom, more so when compared to ridley and k.rool, from a couple of games that did from what i understand average, and when compared to the six 3rd party characters was not a gaming icon, also there that whole thing about how there may been plans before the ballot ended, but we dont have time for thatI’d love to know, why do people hate on Bayonetta’s inclusion? She made absolute sense to me, considering Nintendo essentially saved her franchise, allowing them to keep her on as an exclusive. Plus wasn’t she the top request on the fighter ballot in the EU?
Metroid fans wanted Ridley but more than anything, they really just wanted another rep for their series. I honestly believe when Ridley was deconfirmed as a stage harzard in Smash 4, a certain amount of Metroid fans gave up on him and voted for Dark Samus regarding Sakurai's thoughts about his size and how difficult it would be to implement his moveset and size to the game as a character. I honestly believe a lot of people thought "If I can't have Ridley, I will take Dark Samus."I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. I didn’t really question Bayonetta’s inclusion but that probably just because I’m a fan of her games.
I did personally wonder about Dark Samus and Chrom being so “heavily requested” in the fighter ballot to be included in Ultimate, but just assumed it was more “heavily requested and could be added as echos rather than full blown original characters”. Again, through my Zelda tinted glasses, I couldn’t believe that Dark Samus was requested more than, say Midna, but again assumed that Midna would have been much more work. Perhaps requested more than Skull Kid but oh well.
well thatll be the old why question a good thing id guess, but for those of us who cant stand it, its a little hard not to see anything other than blinding furyI think we’ll have to agree to disagree. I didn’t really question Bayonetta’s inclusion but that probably just because I’m a fan of her games.
I did personally wonder about Dark Samus and Chrom being so “heavily requested” in the fighter ballot to be included in Ultimate, but just assumed it was more “heavily requested and could be added as echos rather than full blown original characters”. Again, through my Zelda tinted glasses, I couldn’t believe that Dark Samus was requested more than, say Midna, but again assumed that Midna would have been much more work. Perhaps requested more than Skull Kid but oh well.
I would agree with Chrom had fire emblem not already got Robin and Lucinda because three characters from one game in a series where the characters change every time is pretty excessive. I think another problem is why is a smaller fandom’s love for a particular character more worth pursuing than a larger fanbase’s?well thatll be the old why question a good thing id guess, but for those of us who cant stand it, its a little hard not to see anything other than blinding fury
well comparing them to characters from other series is tricky, but within in their own series dark samus and chrom were both very popular characters, and i say that as an outsider to both mostly, and have become seen by many as sort of embodiment of metroid prime and fire emblem awakening respectivly which were quite well received within in both fandoms. they probably were just included cause they were easy to make echoes from but theyre both still popular characters
I think there must be some fandom though, otherwise they’d have skipped it while they’re doing the HD remakes. I wouldn’t consider it as disliked as say Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time (which is why they skipped a 3DS remake of that particular entry I think).Why is there even demand for Midna anyway? Her game has no fandom nowadays and is now considered the start of the Zelda franchise's downfall.
well you know how it is, different rules for just about every character's inclusion and different series. i mean there have been a few instances of characters getting in over more popular onesI would agree with Chrom had fire emblem not already got Robin and Lucinda because three characters from one game in a series where the characters change every time is pretty excessive. I think another problem is why is a smaller fandom’s love for a particular character more worth pursuing than a larger fanbase’s?
Like I say, I’m probably about as far out of the fire emblem fan base as it’s possible to be, but I loved the Metroid Prime series but knew the Metroid series as a whole is not as beloved as some series, in Japan particularly these days. Pretty sure that and Other M were the reason it’s taken so long to get MP4.
As a purely “they were easy to add as echos” standpoint, I can understand. Although I wish Dark Samus was her own character because her AT in Wii U/3DS was much more unique.
I will point out that that’s pretty much the reaction I would have if Tingle was added. Extreme rage, because there are other much more popular characters to choose from. Whereas Bayonetta does have a substantial cult following. Apparently the Switch version of Bayonetta 2 did best in the US so there are obviously fans...
See, when I consider Midna, I would see her as the embodiment of a perfect companion character in the Zelda series (and I’m sure I’m not alone) but our values aren’t as important as others’ or so it seems.
must you do this every time twilight princess comes up?Why is there even demand for Midna anyway? Her game has no fandom nowadays and is now considered the start of the Zelda franchise's downfall.
i think they just assumes everyone must hate tp because they do despite that every time its brought up people are lining up to disagreeing with them rather than agreeI think there must be some fandom though, otherwise they’d have skipped it while they’re doing the HD remakes. I wouldn’t consider it as disliked as say Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time (which is why they skipped a 3DS remake of that particular entry I think).
I don’t think a game necessarily needs to be beloved for people to like certain characters either. I didn’t really love BotW but I still like Riju, Mipha and a few others, so I think dislike for a game automatically equals dislike for its characters isn’t really a fair assumption.
Also I refer you back to my comment the other day about Midna’s reveal in Hyrule Warriors. If that’s not fan support, people wasted an awful lot of energy cheering and screaming...
Doesn’t hurt that the Dark Samus AT in 4 was a lot like Magnus and Saki and a couple of others where you see them and be like “Okay, I see some of your attacks and specials, why can’t I play as you?”Metroid fans wanted Ridley but more than anything, they really just wanted another rep for their series. I honestly believe when Ridley was deconfirmed as a stage harzard in Smash 4, a certain amount of Metroid fans gave up on him and voted for Dark Samus regarding Sakurai's thoughts about his size and how difficult it would be to implement his moveset and size to the game as a character. I honestly believe a lot of people thought "If I can't have Ridley, I will take Dark Samus."
Yeah I get that. Although I will admit, I do feel a bit jaded that a lot of Sakurai’s faves get fairly good treatment (I wonder if the only reason Kirby doesn’t get more is it’d look a bit too obvious). Makes me wonder if Zelda would have gotten more characters if Sakurai had got to make a title in the series (can’t remember where I heard it but I’m sure he had wanted to make one at some point).well you know how it is, different rules for just about every character's inclusion and different series. i mean there have been a few instances of characters getting in over more popular ones
*Among realizable charactersPlus wasn’t she the top request on the fighter ballot in the EU?
most suspect the reason we dont get any more kirby characters is cause hes representing his kirbys games, with his trioYeah I get that. Although I will admit, I do feel a bit jaded that a lot of Sakurai’s faves get fairly good treatment (I wonder if the only reason Kirby doesn’t get more is it’d look a bit too obvious). Makes me wonder if Zelda would have gotten more characters if Sakurai had got to make a title in the series (can’t remember where I heard it but I’m sure he had wanted to make one at some point).
It just feels like when they advertise Smash as “all inclusive” of Nintendo franchises (and now outsiders too), some get more inclusion than others. I know that inevitably, there’s always gonna be some section of the fan base who feel this way, but it just seems to me that considering how big Zelda is, it feels laughable that it’s fanbase is one which repeatedly gets a bit of the short end of the stick.
Again, not that I’m saying other fanbases don’t get that treatment sometimes, but Zelda has now had 2 or 3 games with no unique character additions and I can’t think of another franchise which has experienced the same treatment. Perhaps Mother? But that’s all I can think of off the top of my head. Maybe ROB or G&W but I don’t see what other options they’d have...
Like I say, I’m not denying that other series miss out sometimes. My point was that Zelda got its unique characters back in melee and we haven’t had one since. I know it took some time for DK to get as many characters, but one fighter every couple of games or so beats no characters for 3 games in my opinion.The Donkey Kong serie got no one in Melee, and Diddy not being there felt really wierd (he was the most obvious "should be there" with Wario, in my opinion). He arrived in Brawl, but then again, no one in Smash 4. Only now, they have reached a total of three fully unique characters... which is exactly the same as Zelda.
See now, I’ve heard people say the ballot was rigged but because I never dipped on the dlc, I didn’t pursue it any further. So is it confirmed that all dlc characters were in development before the ballot? I would assume so if Bayonetta was as she was one of the last released. Please forgive my lamentable ignorance lol.*Among realizable characters
The ballot was heavily rigged from the start, they had been working on Bayonetta since before the ballot even started. There is datamined evidence of that in Smash 4. I'm pretty sure they just used the ballot to see who was more popular between Cloud and Bayonetta, lol.
Nintendo themselves haven't literally said it, but they won't ever. We just know that Bayonetta was in development at the very latest a week after the Ballot started. Considering the time it takes to negotiate with other companies for third parties, we can safely assume it started before that.Like I say, I’m not denying that other series miss out sometimes. My point was that Zelda got its unique characters back in melee and we haven’t had one since. I know it took some time for DK to get as many characters, but one fighter every couple of games or so beats no characters for 3 games in my opinion.
See now, I’ve heard people say the ballot was rigged but because I never dipped on the dlc, I didn’t pursue it any further. So is it confirmed that all dlc characters were in development before the ballot? I would assume so if Bayonetta was as she was one of the last released. Please forgive my lamentable ignorance lol.
Oh and fogbadge , I completely agree that Zelda does get things like stages, music, items, etc. It just irks me when some people are like: “you should be grateful you get this, that and the other, characters aren’t everything.” Then you say if the situation were reversed, they’d be totally ok with it? And quite often you just get a lame “it’s not the same” response. Also quite agree that if series were represented using sales figures alone, Pokemon as an example would probably have loads more characters for a start.
I am grateful for near enough all Zelda content added to Smash, but I’d like to be one of those people overjoyed because their favourite series got a new character for a change. If like a few people I know you’re more willing to play as characters from particular series (not saying that’s how you should play by any means), it can be frustrating when it starts to feel like every Smash game is the same. I do tend to play as mainly Zelda characters myself but I do dip in and out of other franchises. It just stops the Zelda series representation feeling fresh with no new reps for so long. Although on the other hand, Ultimate is probably the freshest the Zelda series has felt for a long time but that’s down to the cosmetic changes, in my opinion.
Again, there are always some tweaks to characters but they’re often so marginal that only very in depth players really notice them. Of course, sometimes there are more obvious changes, like Link’s clawshot being retired in Ultimate.
Sorry all my posts are walls of text. I always end up writing a short post, then thinking of more stuff... XD
I was not correcting you. But would the situation have been better if Zelda and Sheik had arrived one in Brawl and the other in Ultimate, with only some clones in between? That said, yes, it's abnormal that our last new characters are from the Game Cube - when they were one...Like I say, I’m not denying that other series miss out sometimes. My point was that Zelda got its unique characters back in melee and we haven’t had one since. I know it took some time for DK to get as many characters, but one fighter every couple of games or so beats no characters for 3 games in my opinion.
See now, I’ve heard people say the ballot was rigged but because I never dipped on the dlc, I didn’t pursue it any further. So is it confirmed that all dlc characters were in development before the ballot? I would assume so if Bayonetta was as she was one of the last released. Please forgive my lamentable ignorance lol.
Oh and fogbadge , I completely agree that Zelda does get things like stages, music, items, etc. It just irks me when some people are like: “you should be grateful you get this, that and the other, characters aren’t everything.” Then you say if the situation were reversed, they’d be totally ok with it? And quite often you just get a lame “it’s not the same” response. Also quite agree that if series were represented using sales figures alone, Pokemon as an example would probably have loads more characters for a start.
I am grateful for near enough all Zelda content added to Smash, but I’d like to be one of those people overjoyed because their favourite series got a new character for a change. If like a few people I know you’re more willing to play as characters from particular series (not saying that’s how you should play by any means), it can be frustrating when it starts to feel like every Smash game is the same. I do tend to play as mainly Zelda characters myself but I do dip in and out of other franchises. It just stops the Zelda series representation feeling fresh with no new reps for so long. Although on the other hand, Ultimate is probably the freshest the Zelda series has felt for a long time but that’s down to the cosmetic changes, in my opinion.
Again, there are always some tweaks to characters but they’re often so marginal that only very in depth players really notice them. Of course, sometimes there are more obvious changes, like Link’s clawshot being retired in Ultimate.
Sorry all my posts are walls of text. I always end up writing a short post, then thinking of more stuff... XD
i do get it, i dont think anyone would disagree that playable characters are the best form of representation in smash and while we have had a tone of other zelda stuff here and there its hard not to feel a little disappointed that we havent had anyone new in agesLike I say, I’m not denying that other series miss out sometimes. My point was that Zelda got its unique characters back in melee and we haven’t had one since. I know it took some time for DK to get as many characters, but one fighter every couple of games or so beats no characters for 3 games in my opinion.
See now, I’ve heard people say the ballot was rigged but because I never dipped on the dlc, I didn’t pursue it any further. So is it confirmed that all dlc characters were in development before the ballot? I would assume so if Bayonetta was as she was one of the last released. Please forgive my lamentable ignorance lol.
Oh and fogbadge , I completely agree that Zelda does get things like stages, music, items, etc. It just irks me when some people are like: “you should be grateful you get this, that and the other, characters aren’t everything.” Then you say if the situation were reversed, they’d be totally ok with it? And quite often you just get a lame “it’s not the same” response. Also quite agree that if series were represented using sales figures alone, Pokemon as an example would probably have loads more characters for a start.
I am grateful for near enough all Zelda content added to Smash, but I’d like to be one of those people overjoyed because their favourite series got a new character for a change. If like a few people I know you’re more willing to play as characters from particular series (not saying that’s how you should play by any means), it can be frustrating when it starts to feel like every Smash game is the same. I do tend to play as mainly Zelda characters myself but I do dip in and out of other franchises. It just stops the Zelda series representation feeling fresh with no new reps for so long. Although on the other hand, Ultimate is probably the freshest the Zelda series has felt for a long time but that’s down to the cosmetic changes, in my opinion.
Again, there are always some tweaks to characters but they’re often so marginal that only very in depth players really notice them. Of course, sometimes there are more obvious changes, like Link’s clawshot being retired in Ultimate.
Sorry all my posts are walls of text. I always end up writing a short post, then thinking of more stuff... XD
I’ll admit, there is only one thing I could see potentially improving on the current situation if we’d got a steady drop of characters instead of the flood in melee: I think if we had only gotten Zelda/Sheik in melee but Ganondorf was held back until brawl or 4, we may have ended up with a Ganondorf who feels a bit more indicative of his series. But hey ho, what might have been.I was not correcting you. But would the situation have been better if Zelda and Sheik had arrived one in Brawl and the other in Ultimate, with only some clones in between? That said, yes, it's abnormal that our last new characters are from the Game Cube - when they were one...
id love itI was just thinking, what would people think if they could make Cucco into a playable character? Cuccos have been in almost every game, bar Wind Waker I believe, is popular with the fanbase and I’d just love seeing the final smash: CUCCO FRENZY!!!! XP
Yeah, I get that lol. If they put in any of my most wanted I wouldn't care how strange the circumstances were I'd just take it and be happy.I’ll admit, there is only one thing I could see potentially improving on the current situation if we’d got a steady drop of characters instead of the flood in melee: I think if we had only gotten Zelda/Sheik in melee but Ganondorf was held back until brawl or 4, we may have ended up with a Ganondorf who feels a bit more indicative of his series. But hey ho, what might have been.
What do people think of the idea I’ve seen floating about for a while now, where Ganondorf’s current moveset (although now he has the sword, it probably wouldn’t work) could be passed to Black Shadow of F-Zero so it’d fit nicely with Capt. Falcon, then Ganondorf got a complete overhaul? I get people would be upset at Ganondorf changing but the moveset would still be there, just under a different name... That being said, I could support the idea of a Ganon character, but I reckon people would still complain about Ganondorf :/, plus he’s Ganondorf’s final smash and I can’t think of anything more fitting to be that move than that...
PokéfreakofBACON : I do like deductive thinking and logical assertions but unfortunately if you don’t think about something full stop, you don’t get that far lol.
I was just thinking, what would people think if they could make Cucco into a playable character? Cuccos have been in almost every game, bar Wind Waker I believe, is popular with the fanbase and I’d just love seeing the final smash: CUCCO FRENZY!!!! XP
I would be very happy playing as Cucco.I’ll admit, there is only one thing I could see potentially improving on the current situation if we’d got a steady drop of characters instead of the flood in melee: I think if we had only gotten Zelda/Sheik in melee but Ganondorf was held back until brawl or 4, we may have ended up with a Ganondorf who feels a bit more indicative of his series. But hey ho, what might have been.
What do people think of the idea I’ve seen floating about for a while now, where Ganondorf’s current moveset (although now he has the sword, it probably wouldn’t work) could be passed to Black Shadow of F-Zero so it’d fit nicely with Capt. Falcon, then Ganondorf got a complete overhaul? I get people would be upset at Ganondorf changing but the moveset would still be there, just under a different name... That being said, I could support the idea of a Ganon character, but I reckon people would still complain about Ganondorf :/, plus he’s Ganondorf’s final smash and I can’t think of anything more fitting to be that move than that...
PokéfreakofBACON : I do like deductive thinking and logical assertions but unfortunately if you don’t think about something full stop, you don’t get that far lol.
I was just thinking, what would people think if they could make Cucco into a playable character? Cuccos have been in almost every game, bar Wind Waker I believe, is popular with the fanbase and I’d just love seeing the final smash: CUCCO FRENZY!!!! XP
Mipha is my most wanted Zelda character right now, maybe tied with classic Ganon. I definitely agree with you on another BotW rep. Link's design being based on the game doesn't really feel all that much like it's repping (what many people consider to be) the best game in the series so far.as much as i would love skull kid..., I honestly want a BotW character (that is not link) specially either a gerudo, or a ruto or a zora...
Personally I love the idea of Urbosa or Mipha, or even Daruk but i'm not a super fan of Revali... and sidon while amazing, wasn't that much stellar...
The problem with teh champions is that they have a complicated balance... and i don't think that they would make it back into BotW2...
but... there is a character that have accompanied us in our adventure, cannonicaly could appear in BotW2 and is linked to the actual 4 champions, plus is kinda central to the DLC chapter...
None other than everyone favourite bard Kass!
Besides he could channel the champions spells for his specials, much like Zelda inherited Link's spells form OoT. and in a way also represent teh four champions :D... plus the guy was always a welcoming sight whenever you heard his theme out there.
He can lift my old KK slider moveset and have songs that cause different status affects (poison, shock, burn) AND smack people with his accordion.Mipha is my most wanted Zelda character right now, maybe tied with classic Ganon. I definitely agree with you on another BotW rep. Link's design being based on the game doesn't really feel all that much like it's repping (what many people consider to be) the best game in the series so far.
Kass, though? I hadn't really thought of him being playable. I don't think he could reasonably use the Champion's abilities, he has nothing to do with them really. He's just a travelling bard. As cool as he is as a character, he just doesn't really seem like he has any moveset potential to me. All he does is play the accordion. Would he use his accordion to bash people's heads in? lol
Sure, add me on if I’m not there.I should probably mention that on the Skull kid support thread, we're trying to reach 300 supporters, so if you're not on it, come to thread and let me know you want to be on it
Dunno, i think that he could simply pull a shiek or zelda and have a moveset that flows well and make sense (he is a Rito, so while not an exceptional archer, he could have a couple of aerials with bows and arrows) use the accordion for taunts and victory posses (a sustainable taunt where he plays zelda songs while looking at the horizon), steal a couple of moves from link for the BotW feels, (Zelda style) and as long as he is animated brimming with personailty, people will forget that he have never slapped someone with his wings before. (instead of going full banjo F smash with teh accordeon)He can lift my old KK slider moveset and have songs that cause different status affects (poison, shock, burn) AND smack people with his accordion.