I think Ganondorf getting an entirely revamped moveset is more likely than you guys suggest.
Mainly because of a few things Sakurai has said.
I seem to remember him saying something along the lines of... rather than just adding more characters he wants to put more focus on going back and reworking old ones.
Although I could be misremembering.
Let's face it G'dorf was one of the least-popular played characters in Brawl with one of the worst movesets, so there wouldn't be too much outrage if his moveset was removed from the game entirely.
@ManBear: You are just a broken record and continue to use a straw man, so I'm only going to address the part that absolutely NEED to be addressed.
It's a shame because I think I made alot of good points and even agreed with you on several things too (something you refuse to do).
A good part of the reconciliation process of an argument is acknowledging when you come to common ground or resolution of an argument.
We clearly have a clash of strong personalities but I have nothing against you. You have an impressively wide knowledge about video games that I see as a valuable addition to this board. Just might be better if you were more diplomatic and able to recognise when you're wrong or find some common ground when you agree.
Edit: I just glanced over my post and I don't see
anything that count be misconstrued as being a straw man argument.
Most of my responses were just short direct responses to what you said.
I can see why you refuse to comment though because it's hard to defend yourself when you were using such shameless techniques as putting things I never said in quotation marks.
That rumor is nothing but a rumor, and you are hypocritical to accuse me of using speculation as fact yet do the same thing.
How could I be hypocritical of passing off speculation as a fact when I specifically called mine a
hypothesis?
As I have stated repeatedly in the main Roster Discussion thread, Brawl's roster had been "finalized" by July 7, 2005 with the intent to add as much of the conceptual roster as was possible within the allotted time. This was because late additions to the roster would cause issues with a production schedule. This is especially proven with Sonic, the only late addition with early 2007 causing delays.
This is where the "Forbidden 7" with the exception of Dixie come in, as well as Jigglypuff, Toon Link, and Wolf. They were lower priority characters (being after R.O.B. in the data), and would be among the first to be cut if time would not allow everyone. Jigglypuff, Toon Link, and Wolf survived, the rest were axed.
Characters before them were not "rushed" in any way. Ganondorf is a semi-clone by choice, not by issues with time.
So it's a known fact that Ganondorf was planned to be a clone by July 7 2005?
Maybe you're right, but I think you're just speculating again.
If Adult Link (OoT) using a Boomerang and Zelda using
Link's spells is acceptable, then there should be no issue with Ganondorf using Demise's sword.
Besides, you can't say this is not badass
:
With the swords from Wind Waker, it's either both or none. Having only one is lame beyond belief.
That would be epic.
You know, it's kind of ironic how people complain about too many swords but are all up for giving Ganondorf a sword.
Just saiyen.
It's probably usually different people with those opposing ideas so not necessarily ironic.
I don't think theres a problem with more swordsman. It's a big part of Nintendo gaming. No reason it shouldn't be represented proportionately to how popular such games are.