1) I never mentioned that what i stated was a fact, it was just my opinion.
FACT: Firefox goes farther than Firebird. Illusion goes farther than Phantasm.
FACT: Falco's recovery is worse than Fox's.
FACT: Fox's main edgeguarding tools are Shine, Bair, Dair, Nair.
FACT: Falco's main edguarding tools are Dair, Fair, Bair.
Thesis: Fox's vertical recovery is better than Falco's, because they both have viable edgeguarding options below the stage, but Firefox reaches farther than Firebird. Since neither character can cover all edgeguarding spots at once, it is more likely that Fox will recover than Falco, given the situation.
And this isn't even taking into account rising Fair, shine stalling, lasers, etc. etc., since my original nitpick was not with those, but strictly concerning UpB and SideB recoveries.
2) You are deconstructing my argument? you said 1 sentence concerning what i said, sure, you will probably try to deconstruct my argument now and i am willing to read what you have to say.
Why waste words when one sentence is that's required?
4) I wrote what i thought, this is what people call an opinion, and i said some points on why I think falco's gymping ability is better, i supported my opinion with the things i believed will make a difference between the edgeguarding potential of each character, but as you said, it is all an OPINION, so thus there is no need for me to post some facts, it's just my opinion.
If your opinion or thesis has no facts to back it up, it's worthless.
5) If you say to someone they don't know to speak english, even if that may be true it may still be offensive to some people, i founded it offensive because even tough i know i don't have a good english grammar and probably because of that the way i write may be found weird to some people, i try my best to post my point of view and say what i think.
Not an excuse. If you plan to argue or debate on an English speaking forum, you should have a good grasp of English. Would you go to a boxing match without boxing gloves?