KevMo said:
You're telling me that I'm focusing on a null tell and things that are not current to the game on day 1 of Day1 and then proceed to tell me you'd lynch me based off of a playstyle not conducive to mafia, i can't tell if you're dense or just trying so hard to play talkie townie that you've abandoned logic for the sake of post count.
No. I tell you that you are committing a scummy action and that I know how you profess to play and that it will get you lynched in conjuction with further scummy actions. It's a threat, if you didn't catch it.
KevMo said:
Asking me on D1 to shoot is a wildcard because if you know my playstyle as well as you seem to think you know you do you know I would incap based on a strong late game and kill anyone I perceived as a weaker quieter player for a strong Lylo team, it's how I've always handled mafia and still think from a FORMULAIC stand point it is a strong way to look at D1's. Not dodging, just saying you're narrowing down a playerlist on a subject hard to quantify if I was a 1 shot vigilante in this situation the answer would be none, I would shoot someone like DH ( no offense meant) and if I were saying between the 4 of you I would shoot Brosuke not just based off of my initial read but based on the percentage chance of 1 of you being scum I know i have stronger abilities to read the other 3 as well as having you guys town is a better late game.
I don't give a rat's *** about your opinion on the matter, tbh. Explain your reasoning for your decision and answer your question. It gives a solid stance on who you want gone out of the players I mentioned at this moment. It gives me a paper trail to look back at which is NEVER a bad thing. You *****ing about it doesn't change that.
Thanks for actually answering the question in that paragraph though.
I'm quick to dismiss it because it's completely useless to me. It doesn't further anything. It allows you to sit on a null tell and not contribute. No thanks. I really don't care to watch you idle your way through Day 1 with dead end paths.
KevMo said:
Not contributing on anything major, while dillydallying on the rules and running a silly question that HAS BEEN USED AS A GAMBIT BEFORE IN MULTIPLE MAFIA GAMES IN VARIOUS WAYS OR FORMS is not a null tell, it might be to you because you don't want to let go of your reads but none the less it's a strong lead to have on D1 especially to pressure it further.. you want to control town so bad that it's literally making you play worse. Tell you what from now on whenever you have a read I'm going to dismiss it as a null tell unless I agree with it 100 percent. By playing this way and setting up this ground rule, which lets face it for all intents and purposes is exactly what you're doing (A little strawmannish forgive me but I need to get the point across) you're giving yourself an out on contributing to any discussion that you don't want to belong in.
Gambit implies significant risk. There is none here. Don't misuse the term.
Xonar will post. The man is on a European schedule. I can tell you right now exactly what his response to your question will be regardless of his alignment. That being said, yes, it's completely useless to me. I get much more out of badgering you to actually be useful.
A little strawmanish?
I'm giving myself an out? You're funny. As a matter of fact, I've been sticking my nose into every ongoing conversation at the moment, including your's. It might just be that you're path is a dead end which is just a lovely excuse to sit on a Xonar vote and wait for it to inevitably fail to pan out.
