Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah true. I'm going to try to restrain myself from ever posting connection cases like that. Just cases. AND I'm going to weight ALL THE FRICKIN POSTS. ALL OF THEM.It was a good idea, just gotta be careful and making stretches like that Nabe + MC connection case.
give us the scum qt you scumyeah town played really well this game, probably why there were so many replacements on the scum side of things
ggs
This so much.give us the scum qt you scum
You play well. The key is control. Mafia isn't a movie and you're not the lead role. Allow yourself to develop thoughts more quietly (AND TRUST ME YOU USED TO BE UNBEARABLE BACK IN THE DAY HOLY ****) and think about not what will help you in your own mind, but what will help town. You pulled a bone head move on that cop guilt thing, but you know that. The mind is a curious thing. I mean this in the nicest way, but simply control your urge to be a part of the action and just act more when you feel it's appropriate, cuz you DO make good calls. You just... also make some bad ones lol.So I know I am able to play solid it's that sometimes I have snap judgments and things don't go so well. I also realize I always have this blood thirst and overwhelming urge to show how much I want my scumread dead.
Ok. Can you (or anybody) give an example of something that can be straw-manned? I have no idea. I just here the word "Oh this is a straw-man" but don't really really get it.Ran. Read your posts before you post then and remove things that could be straemanned or misunderstood.
You had no vote. Getting you to agree to be part of a voting block would make you accountable for the actions dabuz and I take because I'd make you accountable for them visibly. I'd have an excuse to openly ask you questions and be like "Yo Gorf what do you think of X?" and you, being an ally, have no reasonable way to avoid answering me. By getting you to answer nonsense questions early on I can force you to answer awkward questions later on or look much more awkward by avoiding an answer.Cuz you're a ****ing g and I should be sucking your fat **** for letting me win.
But no seriously I am curious as to why.
For this game not too much. Definitely remove the emotion aspect to your play as it doesn't mesh well for you, it stands out and standing out is bad.So I played like ****.
What can I do to improve it here?
Ok. Can you (or anybody) give an example of something that can be straw-manned? I have no idea. I just here the word "Oh this is a straw-man" but don't really really get it.
Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate:
A: We should relax the laws on beer.
B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only for immediate gratification.
The proposal was to relax laws on beer. Person B has exaggerated this to a position harder to defend, i.e., "unrestricted access to intoxicants". It is a logical fallacy because Person A never made that claim.
A: Sunny days are good.
B: If all days were sunny, we'd never have rain, and without rain, we'd have famine and death.
In this case, B falsely frames A's claim to imply that A believes only sunny days are good, and B argues against that assertion. A actually asserts that sunny days are good and, in fact, says nothing about rainy days.
An example often given of a straw man is US President Richard Nixon's 1952 "Checkers speech".[10][11] When campaigning for vice president in 1952, Nixon was accused of having illegally appropriated $18,000 in campaign funds for his personal use. In a televised response, instead of addressing the funds, he spoke about another gift, a dog he had been given by a supporter:[10][11]
It was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate he had sent all the way from Texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl Tricia, six years old, named it Checkers. And, you know, the kids, like all kids, loved the dog, and I just want to say this right now, that, regardless of what they say about it, we are going to keep it.
This was a straw man response; his critics had never criticized the dog as a gift or suggested he return it. This argument was successful at distracting people from the funds, and portraying his critics as nitpicking and heartless. Nixon received an outpouring of public support, remained on the ticket, and was elected by a landslide.
Christopher Tindale presents, as an example, the following passage from a draft of a bill (HCR 74) considered by the Louisiana State Legislature in 2001:[5]
Whereas, the writings of Charles Darwin, the father of evolution, promoted the justification of racism, and his books On the Origin of Species and The Descent of Man postulate a hierarchy of superior and inferior races. . . .
Therefore, be it resolved that the legislature of Louisiana does hereby deplore all instances and all ideologies of racism, does hereby reject the core concepts of Darwinist ideology that certain races and classes of humans are inherently superior to others, and does hereby condemn the extent to which these philosophies have been used to justify and approve racist practices.
Tindale comments that "the portrait painted of Darwinian ideology is a caricature, one not borne out by any objective survey of the works cited. That similar misrepresentations of Darwinian thinking have been used to justify and approve racist practices is beside the point: the position that the legislation is attacking and dismissing is a Straw Man. In subsequent debate this error was recognized, and the eventual bill omitted all mention of Darwin and Darwinist ideology."[5]
I've think I've done this two times. The worst example was probably GSS 1, where I exaggerated a claim to you that my father broke his toe after dropping a weight on it. Truth me told, he did drop a weight on it and it was very painful for him for a long while, but he was better within an half an hour. I knew that I didn't have to replace out of that game, but I used it as an excuse to anyways.He keeps on replacing out every time he rolls scum despite being perfectly able to play.
![]()
Am I allowed to say that you did NOT block Scary's NK on N1 and say that it was rather me playing the role of the bawss one shot BP that stopped the NK? Yea all y'all ninjas was wrong and that's why I was gallivanting D2 about how maybe it wasn't a doc protect or a RB (cuz it was my BP status BIATCH!)Am I allowed to do some post-game bragging about how I basically instantly nailed Laundry/Swiss/KWK slot as scum? How I then switched to Nameless/HBW/Bardull right afterwards? How I then proceeded to block Scary's NK on N1? I'm not? OK! ^_^
![]()
he thought he was town here and his replacement was at my request for the sake of telling someone else they were town. dont act like a gargantuan toolHe keeps on replacing out every time he rolls scum despite being perfectly able to play.
![]()
:L I pushed Scary and Bardull as scum this entire game as well.Liked Glyph's early posts and wish he would've stayed in the game. Good play by Jbizzle ... needs to hate less on good players though. Decent input by MC / Nabe helped things as well. Anybody who thinks mafia is generally easier to play as scum needs to read this game. Town win was nearly entirely the result of J and me having accurate reads and a handful of people [MC, Nabe and Vult mainly] being smart enough to exclude themselves from the lynchpool for most of the game. That's almost all it takes for town to stand a very reasonable chance to win. Meanwhile one mistake can screw the scumteam completely.
This lol. I gave scumteam way too much to work with in a slow D1.Dietz got lynched cuz marshy
I thought you were mafia because I thought your scum read on the slot was disingenuous given your lack of interest for the push on him on D1 while you were pushing Jdietz as being a strong town read. I thought that you would have put more effort into actually securing the Scary lynch on D1, but iirc you phased out to play Bravely Default and IRL issues. Me using meta was me stretching for a reason to get others to vote you. The case was weak, I just wanted your slot dead because I thought you were mafia.2. Raziek/Acrostic
Uhm, do not have much to say to either of you two. Consider not replacing out/signing up/replacing in without knowing that you can play the game. It really did kill the slot in of itself. Acro, I guess I would say to not rely on ancient meta or self-meta to make your cases
For an Indy you played like a townie.J said:7. Gorf
For an indy, you played like a towny. Glad you won in the end but I have to say this is like the first indy who told the truth in like ever. If you would not have claimed indy, you would have never had any trouble. I doubt you would have been lynched but *shrug* neither here nor there. Good play from you though.