Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Or a Computer screen. The only way I think this person could have gotten this picture (if it is legit) is because he is probably some back stage Best Buy worker or, somehow, the Demo was released early.
Dairz
Gameboi834
Go take a picture of your TV up close. It will get pixelated just like this.Can someone explain to me why this picture looks pixelated? And I'm not talking about the picture itself, but the image on the screen. The only way you can get a picture like this would be to zoom in in an image editing program. If this were taken from a TV you wouldn't be able to see the pixels so clearly.
Just check Pit's portrait, that's like a 150% zoom there.
Keep reading.
euh... Look I don't have much time and you would need a big reason to say it's real now so I would need this reason now. If you don't have it, then I won't read to find it.
You still haven't shown that it is up by one pixel. I can circle things but that doesn't magically show that they're maligned.
If you are trying to disprove him, you should try using a measuring tool to see if what he is saying is true, instead of just disagreeing with him.
WHAT?!?!
I do, I just really don't feel like explaining it again as it's annoying to have to recap for people who haven't been here. You know how that is, you've done it with me.
I would but I've been on my phone this whole time. I guess I'll go get my laptop, sigh...
Ok then. The best way to try to disprove someone about possible photo leaks is by using measuring tools.
Dairz
I understand that. But what about the pictures on imgur?
I'm with you buddy. I'm just going to wait for E3 now as I'm not even sure what to believe anymore either...
There is a chance of that. As the first two were the only ones posted together, and the Ridley pic after was 2 hours after... hmmm....I've still not really gotten a reply, but that Ridley pic, is it really from the same person? Cuz' from what I've Heard/seen, that pic didn't actually come from him. Feels more like that PacMan pic to me.
@
Pre-E3 times are rough, haha. Also, I hope no hard feelings just cuz' we don't agree on stuff here. :3
We don't know if the last pic was the original leaker either.
it has to.
I am leaning towards the last pic being the leaker as well. But you can't deny it's kind of suspicious that only the first two were posted together, then the next pic was 2-3 hours later and had hints of photoshop while the first two did not. Which is impressive for a leaked CSS. You can always see where it was photoshopped. Having one that we can't tell gives it some credibility
Neat. So, that pixel thing debunked?
Note that the red line, which follows the path of the gray lines (as they would be on thw same axis) leaves a gap between it and the Villager's name, but the space is noticeably smaller with Pit's because the camera was closer. Thus it would follow that Ridley's looks even more distorted, as it is the closest. An optical illusion, like I said.
Woah dude... Great find! Reminds me of this
Note that the red line, which follows the path of the gray lines (as they would be on thw same axis) leaves a gap between it and the Villager's name, but the space is noticeably smaller with Pit's because the camera was closer. Thus it would follow that Ridley's looks even more distorted, as it is the closest. An optical illusion, like I said.
I went and took a picture of my screen. This is what it looks like at 100% resoultion:
Notice the spacing between Ridley's and Pit's names before the border. Even if the Ridley's box is closer to the camera, the spacing would be consistent.
Note that the red line, which follows the path of the gray lines (as they would be on thw same axis) leaves a gap between it and the Villager's name, but the space is noticeably smaller with Pit's because the camera was closer. Thus it would follow that Ridley's looks even more distorted, as it is the closest. An optical illusion, like I said.
I feel like I'm back in my Psychology class.Woah dude... Great find! Reminds me of this
So the cycle continues...
Pixel theory debunked. There's barely any evidence against this now besides leaker not showing Ridley. Add that to the fact that this is the only CSS that has had some series credibility... we are getting somewhere
Can you explain? I don't understand what you're saying. You need to take into account the angle the pic was taken.I went and took a picture of my screen. This is what it looks like at 100% resoultion:
And this is what it looks like zoomed in at 150%:
In the first one you can see the little dots of light from the screen, in the second one you can see the actual pixels that make the image. Which one looks more similar to the picture from the leak?
75 minutes according to this thread
bottom of the box I see a pixel that isn't on the pit one (under the dot on the bottom right of the box)
Not really, look at how the Y in Ridley's box is touching the red line whereas, Pit's and Villager's names are not.
It 100% matches the menus in the direct. Any other CSS "Fake leaker" would play it safe. This one did not. That's got to mean something. The locks are new, why start now? Why would someone attempting to fool someone else put in the locks when they knew that would not be believeable? Add that to all the other weird things about the CSS. And you see why we're considering this.
you're right and the little mac one may have been added from the other picture in photoshop (which would be again insta fake).
I find it strange though that the Sonic C isn't the one from the website.
Believing something because it's unlikely seems extremely bizarre to me.
