Sargent_Peach
Smash Journeyman
I'm glad to see that the debate is back on. I hope everyone is checking the threads and know its back on. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm going to have to ask for a postponement. I have had very little time this week between work, smash, working on a C-vid and updating the IC finder/my metagame article. I'll need the weekend to research, and on Monday I will be ready or I will forfeit. I don't want to hold this thing up.
trust Tera on this one: (will talk in 1st person in the ACTUAL DEBATE) she's paranoid enough at night to go berserk on a book if it fall on the floor. she's not afraid to do the same to you.I'm gunnin' for you, Tera253.
Watch yo'self, 'specially at night.
True, but go to the majority of those who live in this country, and ask them what religion we would be most considered, and the majority would answer Christianity.While it is true that some principles laid down in our country’s Constitution are based on those principles which Christians follow, these principles are not considered to be good values by only Christians. Go to any right-thinking man and ask him if it is good for everyone to have freedom of religion, and no matter what religion he is of, he will answer, “Yes.”
I'll use this quote from the Mayflower compact, taken from my previous quotes websiteIt is also true that the Founding Fathers were geniuses in that instead of pretending to be geniuses and coming up with their own form of government, they went and stole ideas from millennia beforehand, from the time of the Greeks. Greece was the world’s first major democracy, and their structure of Polis, which when literally translated means “city-state”, was incredibly successful. The Founding Fathers saw this as potentially useful in their new government, so they implemented it. They saw the success of the Senate in Rome and utilized that idea as well. Then they used the three-bodied government structure of the British, this time allowing for a system of checks and balances that would prevent any one branch from gaining dominance over the others.
Another important factor is the idea of the separation of church and state. This has been fought over ever since the founding of the church by John Peter. Your quotes from the Fathers imply that they believe in Christian values and that they should be believed by all who dwell in America, but that it was vitally important for the Church not to gain too much power. They had learned from history that a country’s actions based on a religious belief was essentially dangerous and had to be prevented. See the crusades.
Ok..... sorry, I just couldn't find any relevance to the subject.About your use of Israel as an example, that country was founded as a haven for the Jewish people after World War II due to their persecution, and is vigorously defended today as such by us, a controversial topic in and of itself.
But you can use the same analogy for a country like Iraq. A completly Muslim country, a few people who took over, who were muslim extrmemists, and were a very very small % of the Muslim culture made decisions for the country, that would very radical, and looked down upon by most muslims, but the country itself is still a muslim country.It only makes sense that a country considered to be Christian, and a democracy no less, should follow Christian values in its actions. But the United States’ actions during the World Wars could hardly be considered Christian. And I’m not talking about when we were in the European and Japanese Theatres; I’m talking about the selling of weapons, ammunition, and all sorts of war materials we sold to both sides of the war before joining the fight. Both times. We reaped huge profits from these sales despite the fact that they supported German war efforts. We didn’t care. Who cared where the money was coming from as long as we had it?
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/tassava.WWII
The United States’ actions have always historically secular and in the best interests of its people, not its peoples’ religion.
I wouldn't say that if I were you, some liberal might take it the wrong wayIt's boggling my mind that Duke somehow is helping run a part of the Debate Hall...anyway. Funny though. People change.
This tournament should be called Conservatives vs The World
You're talking about the Pilgrims, not the Founders. The Colonies and the United States were two different entities. Also, their beliefs were handed down through generation, but the Founders of the US also encouraged free thinking, which could have come from the influence of their own backgrounds.I'll use this quote from the Mayflower compact, taken from my previous quotes website
The Mayflower Compact (authored by William Bradford) 1620 | Signing of the Mayflower painting | Picture of Compact
“Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together…”
One of the main reasons of the Pilgrims coming to America, the real grass roots founders of this country, was the advancement of their belief in Christ. They believed in freedom of religion, but they also believed in Jesus Christ.
No they do not. Please stop generalizing the beliefs of Christian people, as they are very diverse. I believe that the seperation of church and state was done to prevent the Church from gaining too much power instead of the inverse since the Church has predominantly been in control of the state where it has had political power.As you have said before, this is one of the most debatable issues of our country, some feel that this was to prohibit Christianity from taking over our government, while Christians believe that this was for Government not to take over Christianity.
About your use of Israel as an example, that country was founded as a haven for the Jewish people after World War II due to their persecution, and is vigorously defended today as such by us, a controversial topic in and of itself.
I apologize, I must not have made myself clear. I was referring to the fact that Israel was founded with an emphasis on being a Jewish state, whereas the US was founded as a secular state. To avoid confusion, let's go over the definition of secularity in terms of state affairs:Ok..... sorry, I just couldn't find any relevance to the subject.
Actually, you can't use that analogy because the Christian population of the US supported the sales of these goods because it brought food and warmth back to their homes. How could they not? They were in the middle of the Depression. The general population of the US supported its government throughout the war. Such is not the case with Iraq.But you can use the same analogy for a country like Iraq. A completly Muslim country, a few people who took over, who were muslim extrmemists, and were a very very small % of the Muslim culture made decisions for the country, that would very radical, and looked down upon by most muslims, but the country itself is still a muslim country.
You mean... Za Worldo!This tournament should be called Conservatives vs The World
You're talking about the Pilgrims, not the Founders. The Colonies and the United States were two different entities. Also, their beliefs were handed down through generation, but the Founders of the US also encouraged free thinking, which could have come from the influence of their own backgrounds.
But these were the same people that were the corner stone of the nation. Their children would continue to raise their children and so on.
No they do not. Please stop generalizing the beliefs of Christian people, as they are very diverse. I believe that the seperation of church and state was done to prevent the Church from gaining too much power instead of the inverse since the Church has predominantly been in control of the state where it has had political power.
Sorry, many christians believe this, should have been correct with my words.
I apologize, I must not have made myself clear. I was referring to the fact that Israel was founded with an emphasis on being a Jewish state, whereas the US was founded as a secular state. To avoid confusion, let's go over the definition of secularity in terms of state affairs:
"A secular state protects freedom of religion and freedom from religion, as pursued in state secularism. It is also described to be a state that prevents religion from interfering with state affairs, and prevents religion from controlling government or exercising political power. Laws protect each individual including religious minorities from discrimination on the basis of religion."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_state
But that is just one e xample, there are many other countries that are the same way. They are considered one religion, but are open to many, and are free of worship, yet they are still considered officially one religon.
Actually, you can't use that analogy because the Christian population of the US supported the sales of these goods because it brought food and warmth back to their homes. How could they not? They were in the middle of the Depression. The general population of the US supported its government throughout the war. Such is not the case with Iraq.
The reason people think there are no conservatives on SWF is because they have an extremely skewed view of Conservatism as some sort of Bible-thumping zealotry.Actually, well, of people talking a lot, I have seen many more conservatives than any other group. Many don't partake in politics or are kinda liberal. There are more hardcore conservatives than lefties here. No offense to either side.
I'll just go in order of paragraph then make a closing statement.for time purposes, I'm not going to do a full quote, but you'll know where he posted.
But these were the same people that were the corner stone of the nation. Their children would continue to raise their children and so on.
But that is just one example, there are many other countries that are the same way. They are considered one religion, but are open to many, and are free of worship, yet they are still considered officially one religon.
You can't just assume that the whole Christian population supported, thats going out on a limb there.
Well this is it for me, I'm busy the rest of the week, so whatever happens happens. GL to all