Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Will you **** or get off the pot?I'll have more to say later. I didn't want to interfere with the conversation.
I stand by my nullSoup read. I didn't see anything in his behaviour that would suggest that he's scum to me (for Soup in particular... would be a scum tell coming from anyone else). TSN is leaning town... I think his case is fine, and that your intense dislike for it is a little odd.
This looks better than some of the stuff you were posting earlier.
ohey AW.
There things that seem off-color in Broto's play. That's not one of them. ZacBlock has really sat on the sideline, providing commentary and not much else. He's given reads, but they're weak and he's not acting on them. He's asked a couple of questions. Your constant buddying of him, simply because he's on your wavelength and not much else colors me wrong.
Because town should always be scumhunting in some manner. If it's not a scumhunting post, it's a worthless, fluffy post. I can attribute your posts to fluff, then?
The rest of this is "when have I ever done this," essentially trying to appeal to meta. I don't give a rat's *** about your meta. I call this bad play. I don't write passes for bad play. Not asking questions shows no initiative. Not having scum reads and a bunch of towns that I don't agree with seems weird. I don't care if you have faith in your town reads. I'm not asking you to find town. I'm asking you to find scum. You're not doing that.
Isn't it essentially Broto agreeing with himself?@CR/DH/AW: When you get here and get caught up, I'd like to hear what your thoughts are on these posts. What does it say about both players?
Thanks.
You're not even useful. Do something.
Soup, do you have any desire to improve? ._. You have several people telling you that you need to do something and start asking questions and such, and all you have in response is "it's not my style to ask questions" and then you wonder why you get lynched so often? I don't see how you can say "i can't do anything, there's nothing to work with" when you refuse to ask questions. Questions produce material to work with.
How so? He just pushed me for reads. Anyone could do that.
I won't deny I was sidelining in the Ryker-TSN conversation. After questioning GLG (in which I was not sitting on the sidelines), I came back the next day in the middle of Ryker and TSN's conversation. I made that sideline comment ("Not liking...") to show that it was at the beginning where I saw something was off, but I wanted to wait for the conversation to progress instead of tainting it with my interjections. I fully intended to question Ryker after I saw more. My first post against him should align with this.
Why do you think he felt a need to agree with himself like that then? Why bring up the post at all? Do you think GLG's post was particularly good? Do you think it's odd that he quotes a post by GLG just to say "i like this" right after I specifically asked him what his stance on GLG was?
i have improved.
It's just frustrating to see the game distracted by people arguing over whether asking questions is useful =P
Nah we wouldn't kill TSN right now. We have a town read on them, and we like their play so far. Wouldn't mind seeing them be more aggressive, as much of what they've done so far is defending themselves from Ryker.
Blehhh. I think that you have something of merit here but why are you questioning other people about Ryker's actions, rather than Ryker himself? You're being accused of sidelining, and you're still doing it. Why are you avoiding confronting him directly, and instead trying to dirty the waters? If you think it's scummy, push Ryker about it. If not, then explain why you're pushing the point.Why do you think he felt a need to agree with himself like that then? Why bring up the post at all? Do you think GLG's post was particularly good? Do you think it's odd that he quotes a post by GLG just to say "i like this" right after I specifically asked him what his stance on GLG was?
Direct question asking him for his opinion of my top pick. He says more likely scum than town, but not much more.
Is this really avoiding confrontation?
Is THIS really avoiding confrontation?
WL would totally love to lynch Soup right now, as he thinks he is scum. That was probably obvious. It was probably obvious who was posting last night as well... so far this hydra's made me realize that I'm pretty damn passive
smart man.Asid Wash said:
I got this exact vibe. I do believe, we both found it odd when we went through our read together. A majority of the reason I first post was so geared towards you was your avoidance of confrontation.
How is that any different? Our defense was basically their thoughts align with ours and that was why we liked them.
Is that referring to my first posts? If it's all posts, then I'm sorry, but I really don't see it. I'll respond if you can bring up something more specific.
Sure. I'm not focusing on your early posts dealing with PFP in RVS. I think you were contradicting yourself there, but the contradiction is not why I think you're scum. However, you did not respond well to my questions that came shortly after:
Defending his reads was fine, it was the defence of his actions that bugged me,or lack of actions. I didn't feel like he had been active at all.
