Dan_X
Smash Lord
K, I'll add that. -- Can I vote for a person I already voted for under creativity?You forgot 'creativity.'
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
K, I'll add that. -- Can I vote for a person I already voted for under creativity?You forgot 'creativity.'
You are very good at drawing. But I won't vote for it, since it doesn't even resemble Zelda.pictures
I figured as much, cuz it's not done. Oh well.You are very good at drawing. But I won't vote for it, since it doesn't even resemble Zelda.
i put 'creativity' and i also think most humourous should be a catergory^Looks like you forgot the "Most Creative" vote
My God, thank you so much! It means so much that someone has actually voted for me! Thanks!!! I've been working on it for hours more today...Handdrawn : Supersonic's is pretty and looks like her.
Digital : Spire's. Same reason as Dutchman surprisingly.
Creative : N9NE's. It's not stick drawings or involves magic. ^^'
Overall : Orca. Without a doubt.
The sad thing is, I have equally as many.2 votes for me! Hahaha.
Voting will end Saturday at 11;59 PM, EST.
Sorry man! I guess I overlooked it!! Sorry!! Thanks very much for your vote, I appreciate the appreciation! Haha.i voted for you first, i feel ignored
np, it was really good.Sorry man! I guess I overlooked it!! Sorry!! Thanks very much for your vote, I appreciate the appreciation! Haha.
look up at my vote, i made my own funny catorgoryNAKEDEDEDE: OMG!!!! I LAUGHED at this. It is sooooo funny. I think that a "funny" category would be good as well, or something of the sort.
toondiddy: I actually like the dress, but the neck... it's just so... long... and the head should definitely be smaller and more to the right. If you took a bit more time, it could have looked pretty dece, even without adding much more detail in it.
Thanks, for your kind words. I do recognize that now all forms of art require shading, or backgrounds, but generally speaking, it's something inherent to the completed form of most pictures. Vector art for example, doesn't use traditional shading in that it deals only in flat colors. Some forms of anime, and so on also deviate from this. Personally, I think that shading and a background are always a must because they make the picture far more appealing. Though, you're right, it depends on the style and direction of the picture. I'd have to say though that many of the entries in this competition weren't drawn in a style that does well without some form of shading / background. Most of them need it badly.Orca: Very detailed, excellent, and I definitely want to see it finished. Perfect body proportions, looks so real, and has amazing shading (I'm a bit of a perfectionist too, and HATE it when it doesn't turn up right). Well, can't really say much more about it, since It's a very realistic person. Good luck finishing it, and hope you do more pictures this good. Also, while I do think that shading, color and backgrounds are great, not EVERY picture needs them. I have seem many great pictures, in which I know that if color or shading were added, it would most definitely ruin the picture, regardless of how good it was used, for example: comic books and anime. You just wouldn't want to see someone like spiderman be drawn with perfect shading, as some pictures are just meant to be cartoony. But anyways, great job on your picture again, and I know it sucks when you fail to meet a deadline for something you've been working on so hard, as it has happened to me before too.
It's good to hear more about the thought process that carried into your Zelda. Even if your aim wasn't realism, to most viewers, poor anatomy feels out of place. This of course is nullified as you said you were inspired by imaginative creatures and what not, even still the anatomy could be a slight bit more solid. For example, you could exaggerate the anatomy, make the features longer, or shorter, so long as it all works together. I'll stop here, as I don't want to go on about this and make it out to be that I'm being unfair in my critiquing, sorry if I've come across that way.Firstly, thank you all for voting for my piece. I greatly appreciate the support!
1) Hand Drawn: YagamiDark
- I loved your "Sheik-like" rendition of Zelda, crossing the two evenly, yet presenting the design in [like you said] a superhero-like fashion. It brought Zelda into the light of being an actual protagonist, and for that, I salute you.
2) Digital: FireCrack
- I just couldn't bypass the "toon" TP Zelda. The somewhat dreary, yet focused face, despite very cartoonish, provides a load of emotion in a simple drawing, without the extra muscle-constrictions. You've accomplished something brilliant here.
3) Creative/Conceptual: Zook
- Praying mantis Zelda is simply the most creative. Can't say much more.
4) Overall: FireCrack
- I'm going to have to give this one to FireCrack again, as I find this piece to be the most inviting, and overall successful. It is incredibly stylized, unlike any of the other submitted pieces, and I have found myself from time to time returning to this thread just to look at it. Using vectors was a brilliant move, as it gave the feel that the piece should be animated, despite being a static image, so upon viewing it, one can easily visualize it moving. A piece like my own must rely on brush strokes and form to convey movement, while your approach is very alien to my own. I honor your piece and artistic direction. Really looking forward to your future entries
Now, to respond to Orca.
On the contrary to what you spoke of in regards to the "hair in front of chest" issue, I actually began this drawing with loose, light brushstrokes, drawn with no real direction aside from what I felt for Zelda in my mind, sort of like Japanese calligraphy - it's drawn very kinetically, focusing on the feeling rather than the form. The hair just so happened to end up in front of her. Hell, even after both it and her chest were developed, I considered doing some operation to move it behind, but my concept pervaded my thoughts and prevented the change. My concept you ask?
I wanted to reveal a slightly feral, Sheikah-Zelda (as an homage to both Sheik and the sylvan nature of Link). Covering both the lower face, neck, and part of her chest with her hair just kind of happened, and while it may have been a subconscious decision, it was not because I feared drawing her full chest, as it is apparent that I drew quite a large portion of her chest, including her right breast. Now, as to why the hair is so clumped together. I questioned this myself during the process, and looked at other artwork, seeing peoples' hair much more strenuous and disparate. With my "feral" approach, I wanted to ensure that this hair was sharper, edgier, and matted in some ways, actually physically clumping together. I've drawn more realistic hair before, but this drawing was not to aim for realism at all. Inspired slightly by the anatomically incorrect paintings of women from the Renaissance, I aimed to portray Zelda in my own design, and with "feral" and "sylvan" in mind, I also took into consideration the childlike anatomy of an impish creature, with slightly enlarged hands, and a thin physique. I did not want to portray a royal Zelda at all.
As for a background, yeah, I could have used something, but I didn't. I'm not afraid of backgrounds at all, no no no, and I've proof of that in my painting thread in the AE. I simply didn't put a background in this, maybe because I wanted to carry on the feel that Yoshi presented as a means of establishing a series? Who knows. I definitely will in the next submission, whoever it may be.
I very much appreciate the critique, and I totally understand that you weren't out to criticize me.
As for your piece, however, I saw it, and if I hadn't known this were a Zelda contest, I would never have assumed it to be Zelda. As you said, you used a reference for the drawing, and as it always works, drawing from a photograph always looks much more refined than drawing from life or your imagination. Photographs pick up real shadows and highlights, so using that to your advantage is great, but if you're going to portray Zelda, do something that actually looks like Zelda. From what you've said and from how your drawing looks, it appears you drew a woman out of an underwear ad or something of the like, then gave her a Triforce tattoo. I'm not criticizing your skill of course, as it is very well refined. Your sense of replicating values is incredible, and I salute you for that, but there is an extreme lack of Zelda and creativity as a whole. That's why I couldn't find a reason to vote for you in any of the categories.
But like you said previously, I too look forward to your future works. Just make sure they fit the criteria.
Take care
You have yet to answer this, Ocra.Upon looking at Ocra's picture, I think that he wasn't even going to draw Zelda. Look at the shading in the hair. It looks as if it was meant to be an extremely dark brown, possibly even black. Zelda has NEVER had a hair color even close to that shade. Even if he was trying to draw Zelda, I hold by my opinion that he should be disqualified for drawing a picture that looks nothing like the subject matter.
Sorry, somehow I missed this. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The only reason I drew this picture was for this assignment. I immediately grew excited because I knew how I wanted to go about doing it. As I said, I scoured the internet for a model that I felt would make a good Zelda, and I drew her. No, her hair is not black. You may have recognized that I pointed out the fact that I will be coloring this... right? Well, what I did, to make my shading as ACCURATE as possible, was turn the picture I was using as reference to black and white. Then, to get more glorified black and white tones I increased the levels. I did all of this on a layer outside of the original reference so that I could then look at the original version. She has more of a beautiful brownish red color--- far from a dark brown or black.You have yet to answer this, Ocra.
"Upon looking at Ocra's picture, I think that he wasn't even going to draw Zelda. Look at the shading in the hair. It looks as if it was meant to be an extremely dark brown, possibly even black. Zelda has NEVER had a hair color even close to that shade. Even if he was trying to draw Zelda, I hold by my opinion that he should be disqualified for drawing a picture that looks nothing like the subject matter."
FlyingDutchman's drawing still can pass as Zelda, mainly because of the pointed ears, a correct hair color, and you can see a beginning of a dress, which looks like Zelda's (thought not exactly the same).
Btw, before I even go on to deal with you, my alias is "Orca" as in the killer whale, ever heard of such a thing? Ocra though... I don't know who, or what that is.WHY ARE PEOPLE EVEN VOTING FOR OCRA.
Nothing against his art. It's amazing. Sure better than I could do. But the only thing that even looks like Zelda is the triforce tattoo, and even then, that's something a fangirl would have, not the princess.
Ocra's drawing IS NOT ZELDA. If I was Zook, I wouldn't have allowed it in the contest. It doesn't even resemble the subject matter. It would be like if I entered a horror writing competition and instead wrote a story titled 'Daisy's magical rose land'.
With Spire's drawing, you guys are failing to see that he wasn't going for realism. His drawing was STYLIZED. It doesn't have to be anatomically correct.
This means we can portray the character in any fashion we see fit. If I want to depict Zelda as some beautiful babe why can't I? I already stated that it's not done, but I believe this is a **** good example of what's to come in the finished version. So you can't argue about it just because I'm not done, I've stated that. You argue that my character is not Zelda. No, certainly not, no way. You then said that even with a new tattoo, even a glorified one, she'd just be some model with a tattoo-- surely not the Princess herself. This is your opinion. Sorry, but I must ask you, how are you accepting half of the entries made is this thread yet you condemn mine? Are you so lost in your thought that you fail to recognize how you're singling me out? Here, let me help you through the thought process. I'll provide for you different entries within this competition and show you why you're being foolish.Zook said:I will submit a Smash character for you to draw... In your own rendition. That's right, your own style. Ever thought that Mewtwo should have had his Robot armor as an alternate costume? Make it. Did you hope that Luigi would get a chef outfit in Brawl? Give him one. Love the idea of an 8-bit Link? Do it! Be as creative as possible. At the end of each week, the SWF community will vote on which rendition is the best.
The current shading you have makes Zelda's hair appear to have a color not even resembling her normal hair color. You are capable of light shading -- I can tell this by looking at Zelda's face. Why didn't you do it for the hair? I'm not saying that you didn't draw it for this contest (Remember, I said that I could've been wrong), but even then, this still is NOT Zelda.Sorry, somehow I missed this. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The only reason I drew this picture was for this assignment. I immediately grew excited because I knew how I wanted to go about doing it. As I said, I scoured the internet for a model that I felt would make a good Zelda, and I drew her. No, her hair is not black. You may have recognized that I pointed out the fact that I will be coloring this... right? Well, what I did, to make my shading as ACCURATE as possible, was turn the picture I was using as reference to black and white. Then, to get more glorified black and white tones I increased the levels. I did all of this on a layer outside of the original reference so that I could then look at the original version. She has more of a beautiful brownish red color--- far from a dark brown or black.
Go right ahead. As long as you still make the picture identifiable as Zelda, then this would be okay. Even if your current picture had lighter hair coloring, I still wouldn't think Zelda when I saw it.Again, it doesn't even matter what color the model's hair is, as I can change it as I see fit.
Why should I need a drawing to call people out on not following the most basic rules of a contest? In this case, it would be drawing Zelda.You've got a lot to say, huh Skyler? Where's your drawing? I'd like to see it.
People like you humor me, really.
My mistake. I must've read your name wrong.Btw, before I even go on to deal with you, my alias is "Orca" as in the killer whale, ever heard of such a thing? Ocra though... I don't know who, or what that is.
Sure, you can have your own style, but you still have to draw the character. Your picture looks nothing like Zelda. Many people in the thread have already said this. It doesn't matter how pretty it looks (it really is an amazing picture), but it still has to be Zelda. Your picture is not Zelda.Seeing as how you are posting on this thread, I assume then that you read the rules. Correct?
I will submit a Smash character for you to draw... In your own rendition. That's right, your own style. Ever thought that Mewtwo should have had his Robot armor as an alternate costume? Make it. Did you hope that Luigi would get a chef outfit in Brawl? Give him one. Love the idea of an 8-bit Link? Do it! Be as creative as possible. At the end of each week, the SWF community will vote on which rendition is the best.
Go right ahead. That 'beautiful babe' you already drew, wasn't Zelda though.This means we can portray the character in any fashion we see fit. If I want to depict Zelda as some beautiful babe why can't I?
Many people in this thread have shared similar feelings, included your two biggest competitors for best overall (Or at least, I think super_sonic has gotten the third most votes). This is clearly not just my opinion, but the opinion of people who are also artists.I already stated that it's not done, but I believe this is a **** good example of what's to come in the finished version. So you can't argue about it just because I'm not done, I've stated that. You argue that my character is not Zelda. No, certainly not, no way. You then said that even with a new tattoo, even a glorified one, she'd just be some model with a tattoo-- surely not the Princess herself. This is your opinion.
YagamiDark's picture was recognizeable as Zelda, whereas yours was not. You can make it as sexual as you want (well, no nudes according to the OP), but I still have to recognize it as Zelda.Sorry, but I must ask you, how are you accepting half of the entries made is this thread yet you condemn mine? Are you so lost in your thought that you fail to recognize how you're singling me out? Here, let me help you through the thought process. I'll provide for you different entries within this competition and show you why you're being foolish.
YagamiDark His drawing of Zelda most certainly looks as though she has very dark hair, probably a dark brown, or black. You condemn mine for this, yet this is perfectly acceptable to you. Hypocritical? I think so. What about her leg, do you see that thing on it? Wait, is that... yes, it looks to be a tri-force tattoo. Wait... that's not enough for mine right? It'd just be some girl with a tattoo-- again, surely not the princess, right? Sure Yagami's drawing has a more combative look, with the armored shoulder pads and all, but what if my goal wasn't combative? What if my goal was sensuality, and sexuality? Are these terms foreign to you? If so, I'm truly sorry.
Zook's entry carries recognizable signs of Zelda -- namely the dress and the crown. My point is that if I were to look at your picture outside of here, I would not think 'Zelda'.Zook's drawing looks about as much as Zelda as a dog does a monkey, but that's fine because that's the point of this thread, fun, creativity: art. By your standards, why isn't this picture an immediate red flag. Surely a mantis doesn't resemble Zelda, does it? Wait, does the fact that the picture has two, yes two triforce insignias make that Zelda connection complete for you? If I put these exact two in my own would it suddenly be acceptable in your eyes? Exactly, you're not thinking about things clearly, you're just pointing the finger because you can... especially because you have no drawing of your own. I'm surprised you haven't tried to ban Zook's entry... Really, I am.
I have already explained my reasoning as to why his is okay in a previous post, so you can check back there.
The Flying Dutchman's entry is also okay with you on the basis that it has... a single triforce? Other than that, why is this acceptable to you and not my own?
I would agree to this being disqualified. It passed under my radar due to it not having a chance of winning, when it clearly should not due to not following the subject matter.
NakeDeDeDe's entry is another definitive example of an entry that looks NOTHING like Zelda. Have you condemned this one too? Or is it simply the fact that it has two triforces? One of which is tiny, and is latched to the necklace. Sure there's a fairy there, but beyond that, looking at his depiction of Zelda alone, how can you possibly accept this, and not mine as well?
I wouldn't assume this would be Zelda either. Again, this passed under my radar because yours might have won.Likwid Flash's depiction of Zelda also looks NOTHING LIKE ZELDA. This time there's not a single triforce, yet you accept it. The only reasonable resemblance are the pointed ears. Even then, I'd never assume this was Zelda.
I give a lot of leniency to these pictures. Just look at Flying Dutchman's. Yours, however, looks nothing like Zelda. Dutchman's barely looks enough like Zelda for it to be at least somewhat recognizable.If you don't see where you're going wrong with this thought process then you shouldn't even be allowed to vote because you're clearly not competent. I've pointed out many entries that really don't look a thing like Zelda, but all have one thing in common. They have a triforce or two in each, even if it's the tiniest thing. In addition, the ladder that I showed had pointed ears.
I attacked yours because you might have had a chance to win, when you should not have. The other entries went below my radar entirely.I think it's funny that you can justify condemning my extensive efforts. As if you have some wherewithal, when you're being incredibly hypocritical on the matter. You quite ignorantly overlooked all of the other entries and attacked mine, for some misplaced reason, yet many of the other drawings have the same "problems" that you say mine has. Really man, come on, be realistic.
Go ahead and make her look like a real per-- Wait a second, I think I've seen this before? Ever played a game called Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess?I approached this differently than others, I wanted to draw Zelda as if she were a real person, I wanted to depict how I'd like her to look as a REAL person, and a darn beautiful woman at that. If my style wasn't for you, fine, don't vote for me-- heck, I don't even want your vote. In the end you're vision, your thought process is a flawed one. You're willing to make exceptions for numerous entries but my own.
Nothing you've said has clarified a thing. I suspected you'd take that route. All in all, your problem lies in the fact that my Zelda is drawn realistically. How can an imaginative character such as Zelda be drawn at this level of realism without my seeking out the real Zelda, and having her pose for me? If I had done some cartoon, even a quick one, it'd be perfectly fine. I could much more easily make her look like Zelda... and you'd have nothing to complain over. I'm taking an ACTUAL being on this planet, and using her as my basis for how I think Zelda should look, if you don't see it that way that's fine. Nothing I say or do will change that. I've already pointed out your flaws, which you've passed off because you said the other drawings didn't have a chance. That doesn't justify you condemning my work.The current shading you have makes Zelda's hair appear to have a color not even resembling her normal hair color. You are capable of light shading -- I can tell this by looking at Zelda's face. Why didn't you do it for the hair? I'm not saying that you didn't draw it for this contest (Remember, I said that I could've been wrong), but even then, this still is NOT Zelda.
Go right ahead. As long as you still make the picture identifiable as Zelda, then this would be okay. Even if your current picture had lighter hair coloring, I still wouldn't think Zelda when I saw it.
Why should I need a drawing to call people out on not following the most basic rules of a contest? In this case, it would be drawing Zelda.
My mistake. I must've read your name wrong.
Sure, you can have your own style, but you still have to draw the character. Your picture looks nothing like Zelda. Many people in the thread have already said this. It doesn't matter how pretty it looks (it really is an amazing picture), but it still has to be Zelda. Your picture is not Zelda.
Go right ahead. That 'beautiful babe' you already drew, wasn't Zelda though.
Many people in this thread have shared similar feelings, included your two biggest competitors for best overall (Or at least, I think super_sonic has gotten the third most votes). This is clearly not just my opinion, but the opinion of people who are also artists.
YagamiDark's picture was recognizeable as Zelda, whereas yours was not. You can make it as sexual as you want (well, no nudes according to the OP), but I still have to recognize it as Zelda.
Your picture could not recognize it as Zelda. I could probably save your picture, send it to a few friends, and get screenshots of them saying that it does not look like Zelda at all. Should I do that? It will probably only take about a day or two.
Just posting this up as for what I have right now because my internet screws up a lot... I'll reply to the rest of it in about five minutes.
Zook's entry carries recognizable signs of Zelda -- namely the dress and the crown. My point is that if I were to look at your picture outside of here, I would not think 'Zelda'.
I have already explained my reasoning as to why his is okay in a previous post, so you can check back there.
I would agree to this being disqualified. It passed under my radar due to it not having a chance of winning, when it clearly should not due to not following the subject matter.
I wouldn't assume this would be Zelda either. Again, this passed under my radar because yours might have won.
I give a lot of leniency to these pictures. Just look at Flying Dutchman's. Yours, however, looks nothing like Zelda. Dutchman's barely looks enough like Zelda for it to be at least somewhat recognizable.
I attacked yours because you might have had a chance to win, when you should not have. The other entries went below my radar entirely.
Go ahead and make her look like a real per-- Wait a second, I think I've seen this before? Ever played a game called Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess?
Seriously though, I've explained this many times in this post. I don't think there's a need to post it again.
Nothing personal, man. Just that your drawing isn't Zelda. At all.
Ah.Check out this entry for example.
Flying Dutchman's Zelda
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=6256105&postcount=171
Though I agree that this is a good start, that's all it is. A start. I've pointed out the minute changes that could be made, but all-in-all, it's a solid drawing. This is the point at which the next step can and should be taken. This is when color, be it color or black and white should be applied. Shading is also essential.
Now I understand why many of you don't color, or shade. Moreover, I understand why you guys don't shade, because I've been there. You like what you've drawn, and you don't want to hurt it by shading it. You're afraid to apply something that's new to you. I must however insist that you take a chance, and work on shading. It's the single most important element to any finished piece--that and structure.