Unrelated, but I was rewatching Highlander: The Series today and Duncan literally said "I fight for my friends." at one point.
I'll do no such thing, and Byleth can burn in hell.
I care about characters more than I care about gameplay.
If they're a "Literal who?!" to me, I'll be disappointed, no matter how they play.
I stand by this decision. Smash isn't just a game to me, and if that isn't how you feel- than it isn't how you feel. It is more than a work of art to which I have very strong memories of pleasure and obstacles overcome.
To DarthEnder- how do you feel about a major character (Sora, Lara Croft, Doom Slayer, etc...) to which you may have no personal affinity?
I personally think it would be pretty difficult to argue that Byleth was a bad choice for a Fire Emblem character
My mind is blown by what at first appears to be a paradox, and then continues to be, truly, impossible.
Byleth's moveset is consistently more fun than Banjo but I don't think too many people in this thread would consider the latter a bad choice.
Am I in the minority who prefer Banjo and Kazooie's moveset to Byleth's? The most unique thing, to me, is the ability to order the jumps in any sequence.
I was more referring to the fact that Pokémon is going to have (and kind of already does) way more characters that really should be in the game but can't because it would require adding too many.
Fire Emblem may not be Pokémon, but I think people would start getting a little preterbed if they started getting into the 15-20+ range, thus Pokémon's representation becoming a wonky revolving door of both newcomers and veterans. Granted, it'll be a problem for all series that consistently get new characters somewhere down the line, but the ones that bring in a new cast with each entry are gonna have it a bit rough since the list of their most important characters will have grown way to long to realistically implement.
The thing for me with Fire Emblem, has little to do with not liking the game. I'm not a fan of a lot of the games that are in Smash.
But, with Pokemon, while I am a fan, it just seems to be better for the game. People are willing to drop serious money in the name of Pokemon. It is psychologically and sociologically a matter of study under the heading of phenomenon. Just as I'm not a fan of Minecraft, I appreciate Steve being in the game because it makes something I do love, Smash, all the more prolific and successful. I just cannot say Fire Emblem does any of this, on even a significantly smaller scale.
I know it isn't a question that can be answered, but...
I wonder how many people bought Smash for a specific Pokemon
and consequently, how many people Bought Smash, or even a DLC pass, for a Fire Emblem.
Fun Fact to remember! Only 1 DLC ever has been a Pokemon. So far, 3 have been FE. Hmmm...