Someone hasn't been paying attention to how much money companies make from DLC and micro-transactions, or you would know that these things make WAAAAAAAY more money than games themselves.
I like how you pick out Mike Jones out of 20+ choices, ignore the fact that these characters would make money in DLC by saying 'they feel like base game characters', and don't even address what I said about shilling or new games/new IPs and then say 'Yeah, bottom of the barrel' in the face of the most requested Mario rep, most requested Zelda rep, most requested Kirby rep, most requested Mother rep, most requested Star Fox rep, most requested DK rep, and characters that have had lots of requests that also fall into these big franchises or others.
Clearly, 'bottom of the barrel' means different things for us, because you somehow think that list compares with Style Savvy.
Also, please stop suggesting that someone who thinks more DLC is happening is immediately calling Sakurai a liar...despite the fact he's gone back on things he's said multiple times. I would never say that. If you expand your thought processing, you can clearly see that we still have two more characters coming and that when Steve was revealed we had three. That is multiple months of time, plenty of time for the numbers for Steve to show up and for Furakawa to fall off his chair when he saw them.
It's completely possible that something Sakurai said in the past was true then, but situations changed upon review, and now things are different. In addition to this, Sakurai could still give the same language or similar to it up until more DLC gets announced due to the fact that it would have a scheduled time to be revealed and he has to avoid breaking NDA.
Also, not everyone I debate with is a pessimist, but many of the people I've encountered here on this forum definitely side with assuming the worst over the best or even just being a realist. For an example, I would say that
@NonSpecificGuy is a realist since he's looking at the typical life expectancy of a Nintendo console and using that as a frame of reference, and even suggests that he could be wrong and isn't discarding anything without proper address, nor gives off any sensation of being convinced it won't happen. However, when you yourself flat out say that you are expecting the end while ignoring signs of more DLC and tossing away others, I can't help but see that as trying to make things align with a pessimistic viewpoint. You can want something and still convince yourself it won't happen and thus only see what you allow yourself to.
If you want to say that I'm too positive about this whole thing I'll wear that with pride, but I consider myself a realist that just has more hope than most and prefers to be upbeat than not. You should hear me in my outside discussions, my friends often ride my ass for being too negative. I'll admit when I'm wrong, and I'll straight up say that I could easily be incorrect and the DLC could just end this year and that will be all she wrote until five years from now when we have a roster of only twenty characters. However, the information I've gathered leads me to be very confidant in my stance, something I normally am not...whether you believe that to be the case or not.
Also, you are kinda just wrong about Sephiroth and Pyra/Mythra there, but if you don't know that's probably for the best. Privacy is policy and honestly, it's hard to really give credit, so it would be better if they came back mmm...richer.
My reference point is the beginning of success of extensive DLC for companies of that nature of games, with a long line of similar practices following it. You are right that it isn't the same company and that Nintendo does their own thing a lot, but being quirky can't hold up as an argument forever, especially as Nintendo becomes more and more Fortune 500 in behavior more rapidly...but hopefully not as in BHVR.
Also, I find it funny how Namco has this practice, and Namco is helping with development of Ultimate. Huh, that happened with Smash 4 as well, and that got DLC too...maybe Namco is rubbing off on them in a good way? Just something interesting to think about I suppose.
Plot Twist: Splatoon 3 is exclusive to the "New" Nintendo Switch! Thus it doesn't technically crush Splatoon 2's play base despite being an unsupported game already, or at least not as fast since people will have to buy both the game and the new console to play. Kinda like Brawl or Melee, but much closer in relation.
I'm very happy about that upgrade to Super Mario Party btw.