Indy = Independent, someone who is neither part of the mafia or town (gangstakirby in this game)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
They change my view none. I already considered it. Like I said, a mafia member can easily mimic the way a townie would play, but a townie has no reason to mimic the way mafia would play. So from the point of view that you were mafia, my reasoning was that you would not make such an obvious move and risk suspicion so early in the game. I realize the many possibilities you could have done this, but based on the way you have played so far and by the way you analyze things, I feel you would be to cautious to take such a risk as a mafia member. The only way I would see different is if you and Kevin were both mafia (Which I'm currently ruling out for gods sake ~_~). From the point of view of you being townie, there's less risk in your Aladdin. IMO townies shouldn't worry so much about being suspected as they should in finding mafia. The only reason why a townie should avoid being suspected is to prevent confusion and loss on their side. So overall, Finding Mafia > Risk of being suspected from towns point of view. As a townie, the only way to get things done is by being in the open; questioning and voting to obtain information. But that's just my first time opinion.Exn: Riddle me this
My Alladin picture was aimed at Kevin. What if he's scum? What if I'm scum trying to get kevin to trust me? How do these questions change your view, if at all?
It is basically one standpoint I choose to currently perceive things by. That's not to say it's permanent. No judgment should be permanent or even of surety. "What if" must always be in a game like this. On the other hand, we shouldn't allow that way of thinking of preventing us from progressing. Because there are so many possibilities we can bounce back and forth on something for who knows how long. The only way to get by this, from my viewpoint, is to set temporary controls. In a scientific lab you set control so that you can properly test a specific subject/hypothesis. That's basically what I am doing here. I'm using this sole scenario as way to rule out (or confirm) other specific possibilities. When I said that a lot of my reasoning is based on you being town, I didn't mean so in a permanent way.Yes, everyone should be aware that even though I'm leading town I could be scum. Pied Piper. reread zens long post. He says 'alot of his reasoning is based on the fact jungle is town"
I want him to NOT look at the game that way, it's detrimental to town.
This is the 3rd time you have been so quick to jump someone based off of others reasoning rather than your own. Do you have any other reason why you suspect them other than what dayday has said?-Rei- or Today.
As a townie, the goal is for town to win. If you are townie, you should do what you can to keep everyone else from mislyching. So far all you have done is cause confusion. You haven't provided any reasoning behind your generalizations, and you are constantly making opportunistic votes. If you were truly on the town side, all you would be doing is causing damage through confusion. It's almost to the point where voting for you would be beneficial either way. If you want town to win, then stop shadiness. It's not affordable to lose an innocent. If you don't take this into consideration, it only confirms that you are mafia.I have been so relaxed b/c I know that if they hang me, they are only losing a resource.
This is the original context. You used my words just like -Rei- and Today did. You twisted them against me so I would look shady with reasons behind voting -Rei- and Today.I simply ignored it b/c all of my words at that point would be taken out of context and twisted against me by either -Rei- or Today.
this is the first post Today made about rPSI. I actually didn't find rPSI confusing until he started explaining these questions.Okay. Wait.
You find long posts suspicious but it's generally not bad?
Also, may I ask how are long posts suspicious?
I was thinking the exact same thing. If -Rei- or Today is seriously confused about what I say, I'll clarify, but I have little doubt that one of them are scum.
What's Indy behavior to you? To me it would be someone who makes multiple careless votes. Indy could care less who is lynched. Personally I think Psi fits that behavior.I honestly don't care until we get close to a mislynch/lynch or lose situation. It's a general rule of mine to not indy hunt, as they will be drawn out eventually. Like scum, they have to play the game differently (though a survivor doesn't really have to if they want to joint with town, and then its not a problem anyway).
So as of now, I'm not going to worry about the survivor when he is potentially another vote for town. If something starts to stick out to me as indy behavior when we get farther into the game, I'll make note of it and bring it up when it's important.
rPSI's posts are irking me the wrong way hardcore. He's avoiding questions by beating around the bush. When today asked for elaboration, it took her 3 posts to have it explained. On top of that, it was a blatant contradiction of statements. THEN he asks when night starts. Gonna go ahead at
unvote vote: rPSI
if you really are town you have no reason to play like that.
i actually agree
i have no idea what he's talkinga bout.
I like my vote where it is until he wants to elaborate more on it
Ok see, why couldn't you have just said that in the first post.
You were being intentionally vague. It's a circular argument to say "why would i do this as scum?" Because you might for that VERy reason. This is called WIFOM, or Wine in Front of me, for those who are familiar with father of the bride. It's circular and you can't base your defense on 'why would i do this as scum" because then you've opened up the possibility that you MIGHT.
Why are you in such a hurry to end teh day?
These were some posts that added up for scum points for rPSI for me.Also you WERE answered questions specifically by Today and you never answered them directly.
... what? "If I were a bad guy then why would I willingly not answer any questions you guys ask and explain myself?" That's pretty much what you are saying.
No.. Be cautious on what is said? Why would you need to be cautious if you are town?
If someone is asking you a question and wanting you to explain things you should explain. It's worse when you vote or do something without an explanation because it looks like you are just doing something without any reasoning. I asked you questions because I had no idea what you are talking about. vote PSI.
Also, agree with this. Experienced or new everyone should be seen equally. I've played games with new players before and they were scum. But everyone assumed since they were new that they would probably not be scum and so we lost the game.
That's pretty much what I was looking for. I felt the same way too at first. This is the very first time I have played as well, and understood his point. The thing is, he continues to act in the same way. I doubt there would be 4 or more mafia members, and more than 4 peopleI simply recognized his "newbie" handicap or whatever you want to call it. Hell I can see where he got confused, I was too on certain aspects of the game. At the time I kinda understood what he was going through basically, and figured he couldn't be mafia.
However, I have considered that he might be mafia, (it's only logical that you think about all outcomes imo) and he may have just screwed up. If that is the case, then I think he might be thinking that he has been found out and just figures it would be best to let himself be lynched.
I don't think the above is very likely at all though, it just doesn't seem to work. :/
Right now my opinion about him is that he doesn't really care if he lives or dies and just wants us to figure out if we're right or wrong in the sense of who we think is mafia or not. Also seems pretty desperate to cast suspicion away from him but it doesn't seem to work very well.
I myself am pretty confused about Bungle, Today, and you (Exn) [their accusations against rPSI actually], so I'll re-read the thread and try to figure more out
Basically my thoughts on rPSI throughout the game
if you need me to elaborate on certain points then go ahead and ask.
I agree with that. It seems like he's trying to turn the tables or something just because BungleJungle has been talking a lot about him lately. Quite suspicious in my opinion.that vote on Bungle just killed you in my eyes, PSI O:
It was more of a sarcastic remark. Meaning I found a few things that didn't add up right to me, yet apparently it adds up to them.@Today: I'm also a little confused as to why you are confused about Rei's statement there.
If you go back before the "real day" started I've made points on PSI before anyone really started talking to him. I asked him questions which he didn't answer and continued to ask until I had a clear understanding on what he meant.. which didn't happen.^For that reason I'm fairly confident one of the people who voted rPSI is scum
I'm thinking either -Rei- or Today
I'm an 18 year old girl. I'm not going to be on Smashboards 24/7. I do have a life outside and I am going to go and do other things. I've been here and posted when I've been online. A lot more than some people here has done.I never once said that I voted for Bungle b/c he was leader. I only wanted to make the community aware that no one had done any form of in depth analysis of him. Obviously as you guys can see, on the first day my vote is flimsy and is only meant to show my spotlight of interest.
I'd like to know what kind of defense for myself you'd like to see me put up Wingz. I simply ignored it b/c all of my words at that point would be taken out of context and twisted against me by either -Rei- or Today. Now that they seem to be at bay by their mention, I'd like to know what you want to know from me.
What? When did you ask this? Please quote it. I'd like to see it. It really does feel like you're trying to turn things around.Also, we've asked Today and -Rei- what they're confused about, and they are dodging answering that.
Uhm.. what? How did I not ask for clarifications? The only thing I've been doing WAS asking for clarifications.I was setting bait to see if they would want to have their questions clarified. I made them seriously have to think if they would be analyzed. If they would want something clarified, they could come forth if they weren't scum, but if they were scum, then they would just hide.
Oh. Okay. So you just missed my questions..So I went back and I found out that I totally missed this post. @_@
@1st question: I was presenting you a WIFOM situation where you would try to realize why would a scum act like a scum?
@2nd question: You need to be catious b/c nearly anything you say can used against you in the future. You also have to be catious as a town b/c the Mafia will look for anything to be used against you.
No he shouldn'tI guess that makes sense, Bungle.
But in any case, he could claim to be cop just so we think twice about lynching him. It's an interesting situation in any case.