Mr.Lombardi34
Smash Ace
Specifically smashbot and mentosman: Post something of substance.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ok, I understand where you're coming from with the yaya vote, and I agree we can always test Lombo another day to avoid an essential no-lynch day 1, so for now, although it may go back if we can't reach another consensus in time,mentos i'm suspicious of yaya because i think his justifications for being anti-nameclaim (being as vague as you can get with the wifom junk), suggesting that we can't keep karthik around, and accusing kevin are all strange. kevin's dino is an herbivore and even if he thinks that of karthik that's just running into a wall and cutting discussion. well, it was at the time he posted it anyway
also i agree with lombo. mentos hasn't been showing much of his thought process and i don't think smashbot has said anything since nameclaim finished. at this point i'd be willing to lynch either of them too meaning i hope we start to move somewhere else for reasons i've already said.
AT LEAST I ****ING TRY. YOU HAVEN'T POSTED IN DAYS EITHER (not including today, because you have literally said nothing of value)What about smashbot. He has not made a post in DAYS. I dont see you trying to get him replaced. And I dont think your the one to criticize. You have not made many posts of substance either.
Isn't that how they tried witches in the Dark Ages? Not a good idea. It is better imo, for a no-lynch if we really have nothing to point the way to any mafia, and I really don't want to find the town losing 2 people in one night (assuming that the SK (if there is one) and mafia night kill, on top of the maybe innocent townie that might be lynched.I think lynching Lombo helps us regardless of alignment. If he's mafia, it's an obvious huzzah, and if he's town, then we have a confirmed townie, which is nice to know.
But to me its better than lynching a townie and losing 3 instead of 2.NO! No lynch is terrible! We just come to the next day with no new info and a dead townie or two! FOS on Niiro for suggesting it.
The idea is that unlike with anybody else, we can test Lombo's claim without killing him, since he says he can survive one lynch.Isn't that how they tried witches in the Dark Ages? Not a good idea. It is better imo, for a no-lynch if we really have nothing to point the way to any mafia, and I really don't want to find the town losing 2 people in one night (assuming that the SK (if there is one) and mafia night kill, on top of the maybe innocent townie that might be lynched.
Well, you must understand that for me and several others, you are included in the "suspicious folk" and that this is really the only avenue that will clear you. That mid name-claim post was a really big fiasco, IMO.Niiro: No Lynch is absolutely not an option. I'd rather be lynched myself than that, to be honest.
As marshy said, you can test my role whenever you like in the game. It doesn't help us much to lynch me, as it's a no-lynch except you get a nearly-proven townie. I would rather see any of the suspicious folk lynched today, and for me a good choice for that is smashbot.
That would be true, but some of us are taking caution to him being a 'bulletproof' townie. We don't want to take any precautions or mistakes.I think lynching Lombo helps us regardless of alignment. If he's mafia, it's an obvious huzzah, and if he's town, then we have a confirmed townie, which is nice to know.
If we lynch smashbot and he comes up maf, obvious woot, but if he's town, then we still don't know anything.