I'm lazy and don't feel like quote boxing, these are things I didn't get back in time to say before Day 1 ended.
Ryu's 200 bothers me because he votes Potassium without providing a reason, and this late in the deadline, it looks like he isn't trying with the vote. He's been super jumpy with his votes, trying to force a TBG lynch before the deadline was moved yet his justification was inactivity, which could be applied to other players for more easily. Masqeruin comes to mind. The reasoning for Potassium in his 202 looks reasonable to me, but I find it ironic because RR himself has been asking safe questions and not committing. However, RR's analysis tells me he's been reading the game and I suspect he's trying to lurk. Too much passiveness.
@TBG (This is in response to your 230): Voting on Soup for his PR plan is an “easy” thing to dislike and justify a vote for, I think that's what ~Tac~ was trying to get across with the “easy” part. TBG is working under the assumption that Soup is scum and is working backwards to justify it by claiming reasons that SoupScum must be approaching the game, specifically by diverting the game, instead of looking at the motive from a neutral vision. While I don't think this is inherently scummy, it looks like bad play to me. His reasoning for why ~Tac~ was town up to the specified point is alright with me, but why wait until NOW to explain it in depth when with a solid town read like that, explaining it earlier could have prevented a lynch, but TBG laid back and twiddled his thumbs. I didn't skim but my memory is bad and oftentimes things I don't write in my notes get forgotten, hence this. But I still stand by I don't think there's enough justification on the table to conclude that Soup's motive was to divert town attention this game.
@Soup: How do you come to the conclusion that scum was on the wagon?
.
.