Tac, I do want to see other games you have played this will help me read you. Also tell me how many games you have played of mafia.
Zero games.
Speak proper English. This isn't Philosophy 101. What do you exactly mean here? You're not phased? You should be. I'm a danger to town and scum? In what way? Clarify.
This doesn't tell me anything, nor will I accept it as a response. You're falling back on some sort of tell that I'm supposed to know about you, trying to justify your own actions. Instead of going on about Freudian theories and your complex mind, why don't you tell me something actually useful? Your reads, perhaps? We'll start small. I don't understand at all what you're trying to say. The same can be said about me? Why does this matter? Why even say something like this in the first place? I don't know what you're trying to get at, and what you exactly expect me to understand.
Even with your evident experience, I found the logic in your initial vote and actions to be skewed. Misinterpreting scum and town seems like a waste of a vote to me if such intention was so vague. Simply that early votes would be inconsistent, even within RVS. I forgot to take RVS into consideration, tbh. Within these last 2 pages, naturally my opinion's changed a bit on several people.
Starting small, even continuing that part would nearly be moot at this point, I suppose. Why'd I say it? Comparison.
My only scumread for now would be TBG/Potassium.
I find making wagons (even small random ones) happen on D1 to be useful in breaking RVS and getting games going. Soup and Tac were the only two with votes, and the vote against soup looked pretty serious, so I Tac voted. I couldn't tell how serious Soup was being or if he had any sort of plan still going, so I tossed my vote on in the hopes that maybe he did. Best case, I help a plan go forward. Worst case, I get a mini RVS wagon going.
Soup's idea of all the PRs actioning is dumb. I'd expect this to be pretty PR heavy, (otherwise the whole picking up forks for NAs would be useless) so it seems like we'd all just end up blocking the town PRs. Obviously, roles like Cop and Doc should be actioning every night, but I'm not sure everyone with an action should. I also don't really like that he was pushing for talk on game mechanics when we had no real lynches aside from Tac.
TGB - You're on soup's case because he was 'pushing' for side talk, while at the same time it seems you're relying on the easy vote to progress the game forward while you yourself sit on the side and ride the wagon. Scummy. Also, that he is attempting to distract from lynches, while I believe even #144 reiterates soup's contribution to the game thus far. It'd be much easier for scum to be under the radar with experienced players out of the way obviously, also scummy.
Because I literally have no direction in this Day and wanted to see how he'd respond in the face of adversity. soup/others may hate me for this, but I don't actually have any scumreads yet. All of my accusations have been for reactions or just for shiggles. Dropped TBG cuz he was just a policy lynch option, but even then Tac is probably the superior choice because he doesn't know how to play the game, where TBG does.
~Tac~? I never even gave an opinion on him. Hell, I can't remember if I've looked at what he's said and legitimately tried to weigh his intent. I'm reading him as "doesn't know how to play this game" and I want him vigged.
Potassium - Those quotation marks must be denoting that you don't have any actual reads, which I found pretty close to the quote above it. You're saying that you would risk a head of town based on the my experience rather than forming an actual basis? Sounds like wagon to me, either that or a very hopeful easy lynch. Why is it that you don't have any reads now, no less an opinion of everyone ~48 hours from the deadline? Are you placing all your hopes on a D1 vig, or is it that you don't know what to do about the current standing of votes?
Your logic comes off as inconsistent because you completely detract your vote and reasoning for voting Dabuz in a matter of one post. I don't know what Dabuz did exactly to get an unvote from you, or why you did it in the first place. What I got from your post is that you intentionally baited Dabuz with a vote, but at what cost? Even if you happened to typo, your post doesn't really make a lick of sense still. You unintentionally pursued Dabuz on faulty logic? Your whole reason to vote Dabuz stemmed from the fact you thought he voted somehow. This is really odd and I think you understood that you ****ed up, trying to save face.
I unvoted due to a misunderstanding that I myself had, and I didn't 'unintentionally persue" him. The brashness of my comment was unintentional. Again, I initially voted him for thinking he threw a random vote and attempted to sit back and lurk. Misread. Even NOW I learned that it was TBG that threw the vote and altogether ****ed it up as I read on to dabuz being first post on page 2. Believe it or not. I see where that ended up now.
Gotta wake up in four hours and drive for 2. bbl.
