th3kuzinator
Smash Master
Sorry I've been so quiet, im currently doing a full re-read.
Only on like page 10 <_<
Only on like page 10 <_<
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
When I've posted every reason why he's a stupid lynch, it is obvious for all to see.This also sits very badly with me, he later defends it saying that Glyph was clear AND the flavour worked out for him to be not indy, but that's really not the impression he'd giving. Its just an unsubstantiated stance again, this time backed up with flavour. As far as I know I've not seen Nabe anywhere post saying why glyph is town, yet he is acting like Glyph being a stupid lynch is obvious for all to see
1.) You're not contributing. You have been fake contributing'kay, so I'm reading your wall, and I'm not seeing a whole lot of reasons why I'm scum.
Explain how Seph being scum = me being scum?Any time I said Seph was scum was me saying you were scum.
Pipsy the warlock is lulzy. Don't you think I'd have won by now?
Assume I flip town. Who's the next lynch? Why?
Can you actually substantiate this? You explicitly state that I'm scummy, but I've only seen you state that I'm scum because of set-up or flavour reasons.You and Kuz are scummy and have flavour backing your lynches.
Please link where you've done this. I've read all your posts back to #1000 and you don't give an alignment read on Glyph at all, nor explain why he's a stupid lynch. Glyph did replace Seph but seemingly your completely unsubstantiated stance from D1 on him and 180'd with still no substantiation, despite the fact you claim to have posted reasons.When I've posted every reason why he's a stupid lynch, it is obvious for all to see.
I don't think I've been "fake contributing". I don't think my stances are unsubstantiated. I don't think I've done very little. Point 4 is just not valid; I'd have dice if that were the case! :O1.) You're not contributing. You have been fake contributing
2.) You haven't been substantiating your few stances
3.) You've done very little all game
4.) You're trying to defend yourself saying you always don't contribute, yet in games where you're town you do present cases, give reasoning etc.
The connection between Seph and you was started in my head by a couple posts he made in pre-game that I thought were odd interactions with you. After that, he didn't post and ultimately replaced out. Glyph didn't post anything suspicious re: you, so I dropped it.Explain how Seph being scum = me being scum?
Me saying that I'd have won already as a warlock was me making fun of you for saying that you'd have won already as a warlock. Hence the awesome face.Stop flavour defending yourself.
I'm not sure where you get the idea that I would support a Joey lynch after the events of D1. On the contrary, Joey and J being at odds pre-game made this look like an impossible option, not a probable one. The lynch was quite obviously focused on Tery after J's lynch, not Joey.And no, your N0 prediction was done by Ran so we can assume you didn't get that (was probably Seph). N1 was looking like Joey and that's who you were pushing on a J scum flip but ended up to be Tery. N2 you probably got it right with Joey but thats 1, and warlocks normally need two guesses correct.
I asked you who would be the next lynch after me because I wanted to see if you had actual forethought and reasoning and that you weren't just talking out your ***. You could be town; the phrase "the most likely indy" doesn't mean "indy without a doubt".Why did you ask who I'd be pursuing after your hypothetical town flip? If you think I'm the most likely indy, why does it matter who else I'd be pushing?
I say that you're scummy because of little niggles here and there throughout the game. ToDay particularly, you've had a very pointed and focused attitude on the Day, going so far as to vote for me and to not even consider Kuz, whose lynch you've now retroactively justified not liking based on, lol, my reasoning about set-up and flavour.Can you actually substantiate this? You explicitly state that I'm scummy, but I've only seen you state that I'm scum because of set-up or flavour reasons.
I've shown in post #1715 several instances of you with unsubstantiated stances. Recently you've called me scummy for no backing, and upon questioning mentioning merely 'niggles'. These are unsubstantiated (or in the last case, weakly substantiated) stances. I've shown several examples of you not doing anything or providing faux-content. You have done nothing to disprove thisI don't think I've been "fake contributing". I don't think my stances are unsubstantiated. I don't think I've done very little. Point 4 is just not valid; I'd have dice if that were the case! :O
You didn't explain this then, you don't explain it now. What weird interactions where there? If you were pushing Seph so hard why not even mention me? You say I would be his scumbuddy but also then say you think I'm town. Once again directly contrary to the opinion which you claim to have held all game.The connection between Seph and you was started in my head by a couple posts he made in pre-game that I thought were odd interactions with you. After that, he didn't post and ultimately replaced out. Glyph didn't post anything suspicious re: you, so I dropped it.
I was asking why you tried to flavour defend yourself based on this: "Pipsy the warlock is lulzy."Me saying that I'd have won already as a warlock was me making fun of you for saying that you'd have won already as a warlock. Hence the awesome face.
Please explain how you came to the conclusion I was talking about my ***? I play the Day phase as it comes. On D1 I was getting scum lynched, not thinking about who I'd get lynched toMorrow. I have had forethough and I had re-read some of the thread overNight coming to the conclusion that you were the scumI asked you who would be the next lynch after me because I wanted to see if you had actual forethought and reasoning and that you weren't just talking out your ***. You could be town; the phrase "the most likely indy" doesn't mean "indy without a doubt".
Please explain how this is scummy, I haven't particularly thought about it because coming into this Day it could only really be you kuz glyph and upon reading you stick out as noticably scummier than the rest, why should I bother deciding who is the second scummiest? We only lynch one person per Day.Your answer is that you guessed it would be between Kuz and Glyph and that you haven't particularly thought about it. Which, coincidentally, is a wickedly scummy response. Imagine that.
Explain how any of this is scummy because its not. I'm going to ignore unexplained niggles, and yes I've been focused, how is that scummy? I want to win. I have considered kuz. I stated at the start of the Day that you were scummier by far but kuz had a guilty on (here, here and here)I say that you're scummy because of little niggles here and there throughout the game. ToDay particularly, you've had a very pointed and focused attitude on the Day, going so far as to vote for me and to not even consider Kuz, whose lynch you've now retroactively justified not liking based on, lol, my reasoning about set-up and flavour.
I frankly don't care why you think kuz is scummy, If I prove you to be lying or bull****ting on one count then thats enough. I am also focusing on you, that's because you're my biggest scumreadI find it curious that you don't ask me why Kuz is scummy aside from set-up and flavour, and only about yourself; it's as if you were solely defending yourself, and focused on me to the point of excluding any other option.
Saying something with a confident tone doesn't make it true. Several times I've shown you not contributing, posting unsubstantiated stances and you've done nothing but disagree, with no backing.If you're town, you should probably reread me and see that these opinions of yours aren't really validated by my posts.
Urgh I just don't care anymore. Case against you is a reaching one and Kuz is probably scum, and tbqh I can't be ***** to respond to your long posts which are just BS. You are probably just town who happens to be wrong, rather than being a super-framer-warlock in a game with two alignment-based roles which is what it would have to take for Kuz to not be scum. **** it.Despite my reads, Night actions are leaning heavily towards kuz being scum. Insane cop AND cheerleader AND godfather is unlikely imo, So is any cop AND godfather AND cheerleader AND cop-manipulating indy.
I'ma re-read Glyph atm. If I think he's town and once Nabe answers my question I have pretty good reasoning to say we should lynch kuz toDay.
Showing he literally made no attempt to hunt for scum and get his hands dirty. He simply agreed with and verbally backed the obvscum wagons.@Nabe, remind me why you have only placed one vote this entire game, that being the RVS seph one.
I could go on but the case would just become too much of a reach fest. Fact of the matter is, I know I'm town and its almost guaranteed scum is between us. Lynching Nabe first will give up tons more information to work with toMorrow and it will solve the cop sanity WIFOM.
\(o_o) /I still don't understand. Why are we going for somebody the cop told us was Town?
I guess I'm just really lost. I know there's always a possibility of dumb stuff happening, but the odds seem better if we just go with it.
All of his content is either revolving around flavor or setup speculation while he has done little to none actual play analysis.Nabe said:You and Kuz are scummy and have flavour backing your lynches
@July: You give me too much credit. I am basing my case on pure scummy play but if you wanna trade role speculation blows then I will be happy it with you. You think I could be an indy tracker yes? Firstly, why would I show up guilty to cop investigations? Second, if you suspect such an indy then what is his wincon? If he is a last man standing w/ no kill then he is WAY underpowered. In inception, if you recall, the indy was given bullet proof AND unlynchable status until a certain player was killed. Wincon similar to that of a Warlock or Piper? Neither of those roles would allow the player to use that power AND watch/track someone. It would be their sole weapon. Things simply don't make sense for me being indy.th3kuzinator said:I have my suspicions on Glyph, as I feel he has successfully coasted his way through this game and I don't buy Nabe's clear on him for a second. However, not lynching inbetween Nabe and myself toDay would just bring up more sanity WIFOM toMorrow, which should be taken care of ASAP.
Fine with this except would rather have July cop X1. No offense to glyph, but I would feel so much safer knowing X1 is town rather than Glyph. I would have no problem targeting glyph.How about this: we lynch Nabe, if he's town, we most likely don't lose. During the night, you investigate Glyph. Kuz (attempts) to track X1. If you get an Innocent on Glyph, we lynch Kuz. If you get a Guilty on Glyph, well, that would be very unlikely ._.
And Roxy protect July, obv
ok.Fine with this except would rather have July cop X1. No offense to glyph, but I would feel so much safer knowing X1 is town rather than Glyph. I would have no problem targeting glyph.
Ok, hammer Nabe now.I protect all day erry day
Stay swaggin.
\(o_o)/
vote: nabe