Wow Lightlink, you don't seem to understand that Sakurai decides when to release the game.
You don't seem to understand that he realistically can't release it too late. Bad things happen when games are postponed too often. Nintendo is all around good at avoiding those bad things, but it's not something people look for.
He can put in any and all 1rst party characters as he wants.
He has infinite money then?
Of course he doesn't want the game to be realesed years from now, but he will put in the ones he wants until he is satified.
Within the confines of realism of course.
I'm sure he decided on a release date depending on what he wanted in the game.
So am I. I am also sure that he kept in mind realistic times when he decided what he wanted. There are certainly things that aren't in Brawl because it would have taken too long, and he didn't want to have it take so long to produce.
If you think he said, "I'm gonna release the game on Dec 3. Now, time to decide who's in and who's out" then your nuts.
That's not what I think he said. I think he said "We have around X years" and went with that. It would be better to do that because like I said, bad things happen if a game takes too long, and it's easier to keep a deadline in mind.
He's not even making valid points. He's just quoting our arguments and spewing pseudo-intelligent babble back at people that has no real substance. He's the king of argument-dodging.
Prove it. Show you making a point, and show me dodging it. I'd love to see this.
heres that everyone? Sakurai, the director of a video game, has NO control over anything in his game.
Having time, money, and licensing constraints = no control over anything in his game?
Strawmen. Huge, gigantic strawman.
its all time, money, and licenses. if a time, money, and license allow Sonic in, then Sakurai CANT POSSIBLY say no EVEN IF HE WANTED TO. best choose your words carefully next time, IDIOT
I honestly can't decipher this. Rewrite this in English please.
1. LightLink17 turned it into a flame war when he decided to get personal and reosrt to name-calling and insults
Yeah, because calling somebody "dumb" "stupid" and "********" when they consistently talk about things nobody ever said is so bad, and doesn't fit at all.
Oh wait.
3. LightLink isnt debating crap, hes conveniently ignoring my points
Prove it. Quote your points, and quote me ignoring them. Once again, I'd love to see this.
The problem is, your points are crap. So I go into large detail as to why. And all of a sudden we're somewhere else and I "ignored" your points. Puhleeze.
So, once again, Prove it.