How does this even make sense....?
10characters
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
How does this even make sense....?
So are "Flirt" and "Tease." Yet they are different. Synonyms are only slightly similar, they have different connotation's and different subtleties.Nonsense. look in a thesaurus. "set" and "fixed" are SYNONYMS
well no they didnt which is why theyre limit has a range...a target range, if you will. if Sakurai says around 40 characters and one character is confirmed, there are STILL "around 40" slots left...hence no fixed value. they plan that range for the sake of including as many iconic/fun-to-play characters. Sakurai's is NOT saying "Diddy is in so i guess we cant put in Olimar now". that is what youre implying and that is what im proving false[/QUOTE]"40-45" is no integer ive ever heard ofQUOTE=LightLink17;2795951]f you ever developed anything, you always work out exactly what is possible to do, by mapping out your goals and monetary abilities. They didn't walk in with no plan for the number of characters. This has been said to you several times.
And yet I seem to be more English than you. Capitalize your "I" and end your sentences with a period. Use apostrophes. And I mean the symbol, not the figure of speech. I'm not perfect, but sheesh. If you want to make a big deal out of a snide comment...i was born in England so dont ever try insulting me like that again
Around 40 is fixed. Your idiotic "after one character, there's still around 40 left" is nonsense. That's true, but it doesn't work the way you say it does. After one character, there is a little less than "around 40" not exactly "around 40." If it was exactly "around 40" there'd be no limit, the sentence "around 40" would be meaningless!that was my point. "Exactly 40 characters" implies a FIXED limit... "AROUND 40" does not
I'm sure I've missed something. But anyway, who doesn't love Zippocat?Oh, and don't worry RDK. Volrec is just mad because Zippocat's been deconfirmed for Brawl.
WAY TO BE A ****ING *****.Way to not answer my question
Grr, angry giant red text
Hey, bud. "Connotations" doesn't need an apostrophe.So are "Flirt" and "Tease." Yet they are different. Synonyms are only slightly similar, they have different connotation's and different subtleties.
You're the one who made a big deal out of a stupid comment. Should have just ignored it. You expect me to leave you alone after you get all pissy and claim your English heritage like it makes it more insulting?as fun as it has been debating this with you, it seems youre more concerned with grammatical blunders
ya1 spallng iz z0 ovoraetd)(which arent really blunders seeing as this isnt a college essay and i could care less about punctuation).
I don't care. I didn't care before you made such a big deal out of nothing. You might as well have said "Make fun of my spelling!"this is me typing casually.
Nope. Producing epic lulz for me. I can reread what I wrote, and laugh. It's hilarious.correcting me is only succeeding in making yourself look like a worthless assbag.
Do you know what arbitrary means? A number that insignificantly deviates from 40 is not arbitrary. I guess on definition I can pull out of my head fits, but it still seems the wrong word. The more common definitions are completely wrong however.the "around 40" statements was meant to imply that "around 40" means any number that insignificantly deviates from 40, and thus is arbitrary.
Um, no. I read words. I use words. And I know that words have meanings. And in the written word, I will read what you write, rather than try to infer what you mean. Not my fault you can't write properly.do you know what that number is? as smart as you like to think you are, you probably dont. the fact that you took that previous statement and tried to twist it into the meaning that you blatantly knew i was referring to (the infinite "around 40" crap) shows that all youre trying to do is appear funny as well as smart.
He's supporting me? Man, he sure fooled me. It seemed he was making fun of Mr. Kirby for different reasons.and the only person supporting you is that fool Volrec.
I'd like some reasoning for this. You're the only one so far who believes this nonsense. It simply makes no sense that this would be the case. All your talk just doesn't make any sense.characters in brawl (with the exception of 3rd party/retro characters) DO NOT take away from the chances of other characters in different franchises PERIOD.
No. That is a possible reason, but it's also possible that she didn't get in because a more important character from another franchise bumped her out. There is a limit as to what can be done. Obviously.youre basically saying that (example) Diddy's inclusion has lowered Dark Samus chances. if Dark Samus doesnt get in, its because her OWN franchise has more significant reps and thats all the rep Sakurai will be satisfied with.
You're dumb. You can't just wish things to be there. He may be Sakurai, but he's not the one funding this project. He can't afford infinite characters. He doesn't have infinite time. He can't create infinite characters even if he could afford it.if he wants more, he'll put more. he's Sakurai, youre not. Game Over.
maybe i should not get "pissy" and just troll like you do. bet thatll give me plus points in your bookYou're the one who made a big deal out of a stupid comment. Should have just ignored it. You expect me to leave you alone after you get all pissy and claim your English heritage like it makes it more insulting?
yeah because thats exactly what i said or what i impliedya1 spallng iz z0 ovoraetd)
didnt you say something about spelling?lulz
glad youre amuse by something so juvenile. says alot aout your characterI can reread what I wrote, and laugh. It's hilarious.
depending on HOW insignificantly it deviates (which isnt specified) then YES it is arbitraryDo you know what arbitrary means? A number that insignificantly deviates from 40 is not arbitrary.
this coming from someone who uses "lulz". funny and everyone else on this thread understands my writing. i guess theyre all ******** tooAnd in the written word, I will read what you write, rather than try to infer what you mean. Not my fault you can't write properly.
anyone else think it makes no sense? cuz yesterday i said the same thing and everyone agreed with me and disagreed with you.I'd like some reasoning for this. You're the only one so far who believes this nonsense. It simply makes no sense that this would be the case. All your talk just doesn't make any sense.
if i was, idbe thinking that Wario in brawl lowers Diddy chances....like you doYou're dumb.
had i even said any of those thing, you mightve actually had a point on meYou can't just wish things to be there. He may be Sakurai, but he's not the one funding this project. He can't afford infinite characters. He doesn't have infinite time. He can't create infinite characters even if he could afford it.
seeing as im a Comp Sci/Economics major at an ivy league school, i have to disagree with you. go on, reply. heres come yet another instance of you embarassing yourselfYou have no knowledge as to how businesses and production of any kind works do you? Completely missed economics and business management classes, didn't you?
Because I was excited, I'm sorry for being Happy about my favourite character being confirmed?Talendime said:Why, oh WHY, did the thread starter have to go and change the name of this topic to "suck it"?
We're just a hell of a lot happier than you is allTalendime said:Why can't those (me included) who wanted Diddy confirmed just be happy about it?
At least it's better than Diddy 4 Brawl posted over and over again.Talendime said:Look what happened here, look at this frikking ARGUEMENT. Holy....
Rambi by himself would be boring, if it was all the real animal buddies (which means all the animal buddies aside from the JB ones) were in it, maybe. But the Guitar Gazzump does seem the most likely.freeman123 said:I hope Diddy's FS is Rambi.
I've said this already. If I was trolling, there'd be lolicon and guro everywhere.maybe i should not get "pissy" and just troll like you do. bet thatll give me plus points in your book
You're reactions are more funny than normal.yeah because thats exactly what i said or what i implied
Yeah. I don't care much about it. It's only because you had to get all uppity about a little comment.didnt you say something about spelling?
No. They don't. Somebody else has already quoted a paragraph from you and commented how it made no sense.this coming from someone who uses "lulz". funny and everyone else on this thread understands my writing. i guess theyre all ******** too
You said that Sakurai "Could put more" if "He wants more". He can't. So I do have a point. So shut up.had i even said any of those thing, you mightve actually had a point on me
Haha. So funny. It's like you're trying to be funny.seeing as im a Comp Sci/Economics major at an ivy league school, i have to disagree with you. go on, reply. heres come yet another instance of you embarassing yourself
Oh come on, You did not let everyone know that you've ran out of **** to say so you used the ever so copied "ur gay" insult?LightLink17 + Volrec = gay
I've said this already. If I was trolling, there'd be lolicon and guro everywhere.
But you are. So it fits. Lulz.Oh come on, You did not let everyone know that you've ran out of **** to say so you used the ever so copied "ur gay" insult?
if you mean your fellow 4chan sextoy by the name of Volrec, then youre still wrong. he said that me accusing him of liking Zippocat made no sense...learn to readNo. They don't. Somebody else has already quoted a paragraph from you and commented how it made no sense.
"hey guess what Sakurai, you CANT PUT SONIC IN if YOU WANT SONIC IN, so shut up and abide by LightLink17's logic"You said that Sakurai "Could put more" if "He wants more". He can't. So I do have a point. So shut up.
wow...nothing gets by you, does it?Haha. So funny. It's like you're trying to be funny.
so says a Zippocat supporterAt any rate, I'm done unless somebody has something relevant. I really don't like killing threads.
Yep, pretty much
Sir i don't appreciate you using the word "gay" in a degrading and negative way. As a raging homo i am deeply offended.But you are. So it fits. Lulz.
Good.Sir i don't appreciate you using the word "gay" in a degrading and negative way. As a raging homo i am deeply offended.
'"hey guess what Sakurai, you CANT PUT SONIC IN if YOU WANT SONIC IN, so shut up and abide by LightLink17's logic"
How do you automatically assume I'm from 4chan by commenting on the ignore button, Ivy League ****er? How do I support Zippocat? I haven't mentioned **** about him. This itself proves you don't listen to anyone but yourself.if you mean your fellow 4chan sextoy by the name of Volrec, then youre still wrong. he said that me accusing him of liking Zippocat made no sense...learn to read
"hey guess what Sakurai, you CANT PUT SONIC IN if YOU WANT SONIC IN, so shut up and abide by LightLink17's logic"
wow...nothing gets by you, does it?
so says a Zippocat supporter
Game...Set...and Match
Diddy is in brawl SO SUCK IT
That's funny, coming from you. Notice how not one member at SWF thinks you or your idiotic one-liners are funny.How do you automatically assume I'm from 4chan by commenting on the ignore button, Ivy League ****er? How do I support Zippocat? I haven't mentioned **** about him. This itself proves you don't listen to anyone but yourself.
i don't think volrec and lightlink are the ones bing angryHey guys, lets stop flaming. I got a PM to check this out, and I've read some of LightLink's posts and whatnot and he is seemingly just debating the heck out of you guys, so don't make this into a flame war. I would like to say to both Volrec and LightLink to just tone it down a little, you can make your point without being angry.
Keep it civil, I'm off to bed.
WAY TO BE A ****ING *****.
He's not even making valid points. He's just quoting our arguments and spewing pseudo-intelligent babble back at people that has no real substance. He's the king of argument-dodging.Hey guys, lets stop flaming. I got a PM to check this out, and I've read some of LightLink's posts and whatnot and he is seemingly just debating the heck out of you guys, so don't make this into a flame war. I would like to say to both Volrec and LightLink to just tone it down a little, you can make your point without being angry.
A duck? How's he typing without fingers?He's not even making valid points. He's just quoting our arguments and spewing pseudo-intelligent babble back at people that has no real substance. He's the king of argument-dodging.
As for Volrec, he's just a d_ck.
Your just mad cause you feel like being called gay is an insult(insecure maybe).i don't think volrec and lightlink are the ones bing angry
Well then don't engage into a debate with him if you feel that way.He's not even making valid points. He's just quoting our arguments and spewing pseudo-intelligent babble back at people that has no real substance.