#HBC | Kary
Fiend of Fire
I can't tell if this is the stupidest thing or the scummiest thing I've ever read.I've outlined repeatedly why I think FF is scum. I would prefer to remove JTB first before removing FF to double check myself.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I can't tell if this is the stupidest thing or the scummiest thing I've ever read.I've outlined repeatedly why I think FF is scum. I would prefer to remove JTB first before removing FF to double check myself.
Get a load of this guy.I can't tell if this is the stupidest thing or the scummiest thing I've ever read.
Well then explain why it is better to lynch JTB before FF if you think FF is more likely to be scum. Yes I can act like a douchebag but I still have a point.Get a load of this guy.
I thought I was the biggest douchebag to touch mafia, but I've finally met someone in a class of their own.
Is this Rockin on form? I feel like I've never played with the guy.Unlike those spineless people who may have wanted to replace out, I'm going to keep going with this ship till I am lynched/we win the game as town.
OK, after stepping back and re-reading our interaction from yesterday, I can see your argument. My language is typically noncommittal (lots of "maybe"s and "probably"s) due to me not knowing the actual setup and not wanting to make an incorrect assumption that could lead me down the wrong path entirely. With that said, I concur that the noncommittal nature of my language could be seen as generating a means to have an out (although I still don't entirely see how anyone could make committal statements over theories, no matter how string). I also apologize for how out-of-hand some of my comments got yesterday; I just got frustrated because I thought you were flat-out ignoring my posts saying that I didn't think you and Uto are SvS rather than just thinking I could back out of them. Kinda ironic that I misrepresented your play as blind when you just weren't buying that I was hard committing to what I was stating .(thanks btw, I do feel better this morning)
I'm not sure if you read my post-by-post breakdown that includes all of your posts re: me, or if you're missing my point here.
The issue that I'm having is that you almost never gave a definitive, set-in-stone read on either me or Utopian. Pretty much every read past the first initial big catch up post included some clause that would let you wiggle out of it and change. Stuff like "I'll need to reread later" or "here's what I think but it could also totally be something else too." Like here, where you definitively say that you don't consider it SvS, but you immediately account for other possibilities and give yourself an out to go in one of three directions post flip:
Pretty much every post that involves your read on me or Utopian has this kind of language, and the main one that doesn't (Utopian post-gambit), you immediately backtrack on and reverse opinions after someone brings it up to you.
It's weird, and it's enough for me to have you as a scum read, especially after your defense went for an attack of character rather than just plain reasoning. Then combine it with JeXs behavior (and I will reply to your big post re: that and other stuff) and it just gets worse.
Fair, Rockin or Nabe is likely the play today if I'm not it. At this point I'm still fine with being the play if necessary, but I feel less strongly that I need to by lynched asap. Other slots are being discussed, scumhunting is happening, and we are no longer arguing in circles about me instead of dropping the hammer. My complaint has been addressed.
I'd include JTB in that, but it sounds like Gorf and others find it to go against the spirit of the game. I'd actually love a chill convo post-game about that, but I'm also starting to agree on self-policing being a necessary thing rather than just mod action.
Vote: Rockin
Also whether it's as town or scum, I don't think I've ever seen Rockin not vote for someone pushing his lynch, lol. I take his vote on me as a null tell.
I already outlined it earlier. A lot of my read on FF hinges on the way his JTB read developed (or lack of development in this case) and the way that his hop onto that wagon is disgusting.Well then explain why it is better to lynch JTB before FF if you think FF is more likely to be scum. Yes I can act like a douchebag but I still have a point.
My order hasn't changed.Rockin > Pythag > Spak for me right now. That's my people I'd be willing to lynch today.
This **** pisses me off. There is NOTHING in here that helps you read Nabe or lets me know when I can expect to be able to read Nabe.Skimming the last few pages, which is inherently meaningless, I don't think Lore is scum. Mac seems off.
ranmaru Having a small active cast skews scumreads towards the active players, in my experience. Do you think any active player looks worse currently than they would if the whole cast were active?
On that list, I am ONLY willing to remove Rockin and would rather lynch other places first.Rockin > Pythag > Spak for me right now. That's my people I'd be willing to lynch today.
If we mislynch within our group of actives and then have one more night killed, we go down to needing absolute unity among our active posters to reach a lynch, else we give a bunch of the power to the inactive slots. IN ADDITION, the coasting slots get to keep hiding in a large group of ****.With 14 alive, it takes 8 for majority.
Not everyone plays like you and I do in that respect. I don't think not interacting with your scumlean is a scum tell for certain. When it is, it's dependent on other factors. Meta, for example. If you were doing that, I would have a problem. Spak, not so much.What do you think of Spak not interacting with Pythag when Pythag is his scumlean?
Wait, what?I think it's possible. Although I do think we should be thinking about the Doop wagon. For example, Nabe, JTB, and FF were all off the wagon, while Tom was on it. That's mostly why I want to look at Pythag and Spak.
That is a MASSIVE assumption.Yes, I am still assuming it was a bus. I also think there might have been a scum off the wagon as well, but not more than one. That's why I feel we should be looking at Pythag and Spak.
That ****ing terrifies me because I think this is a game losing play.Yes, I do.
I am going to be mostly out due to some unexpected plans today, but I'll have my phone and can make simple responses/vote/answer questions.So we have you, Ran, Spak, Lore, Gorf, Mac, Rockin, Pythag, and me who can all mobilize.
That is only one more than majority. Lynching WITHIN that group will require either an outside vote from one of the people who've been inactive or it will take unanimous decision.
As long as you're here tomorrow, we're fine even in a worst case scenario.I am going to be mostly out due to some unexpected plans today, but I'll have my phone and can make simple responses/vote/answer questions.
My priority is Rockin/Spak > JTB > FF > Nabe unless I'm forgetting someone (literally just woke up), and I will move my vote to whoever you guys decide on out of that pool. I trust your judgment Ryker, same with Ran.
Honestly while Rockin/Spak are scum reads, at least they're ****ing active. I can accept them not being the lynch today for the sake of the game itself. I'm very ****ing frustrated at this situation.