#HBC | ZoZo
Shocodoro Blagshidect
nah movie critics etc would not be where it was right now if movie quality was entirely subjective
its largely objective
its largely objective
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Actually no. Saying that movies are objectively rated goes against what objectivity and subjectivity mean. It's factually incorrect.Perhaps from your view. But not mine.
No you need Jesus.Actually no. Saying that movies are objectively rated goes against what objectivity and subjectivity mean. It's factually incorrect.
Also Xonar that's also really wrong. Look up any movie review and you'll see almost all of it is based on subjectivity
join the pogeymans game tom!
We are a very goofy people. Our internal revenue tax service just got exposed for paying a key speaker $17,000 to draw motivational pictures, yes, a key speaker who draws pictures. And another motivational speaker $25,000 to teach our tax masters inner feng shui towards inner enlightenment by going 'crazy' and thinking 'out of the box'. Apparently filing taxes can be a very creative process if you put your mind into it. Our General Service Administration which is supposed to catch these wasteful spending antics, appropriately spent $835,000 at a Las Vegas Convention in which $6,300 was spent on making commemorative coins for the occasion. Yes, our federal bureaus know that there's no better value for real money than making more fake money. However, lately we've both been goofy as of late. Perhaps our goofy-pandemic is reaching cross borders as Toronto mayor Rob Ford has shown to have been making progressive efforts in getting cocaine off the street on his own power of consumption. HALF A MIND. I wish.EE said:@Acro: I sincerely believe that after the world has ended, someone's going to point at this and say "that's where we done goofed" it's a great sadness, honestly, like it legitimately depresses me
While many of these are phrased as quality arguments, they actually draw on Western film-making conventions, which have iterated through generations to drive what we perceive as "good" today. You can tell a difference between those mediums (film and YT), and as such you (or your 'people') draw that line on quality. But even the seemingly objective fact of that difference would be intrinsically altered to someone unused to those conventions, and for any number of reasons YT could be subjectively judged as better than films by those people. Or by anyone -- I mean, I could say a video was "objectively better" because it subverts the modern filmmaking conventions I've grown used to (See: any film of the first half of the previous century, any Japanese cartoon pre-1985), but I'd be wrong in saying so. This is the only reason movie reviews exist as subjective judgments of content, and it's the reason why not every film looks alike.There's obviously a line that people draw on quality. You can tell the difference between a major Hollywood film and a youtube video made by a guy with a camcorder. Like lighting, camera angles, special effects, the level of acting, the script, all come into play when we internally decide whether the movie is good or not.
you know that feeling when you step into the dgames socialDid I just miss an objectivity vs. subjectivity debate?
Thank goodness.
you know that feeling when you step into the dgames social
and you feel like there's another big debate you've got to defuse in a humorous fashion
because it's important to have a well-rounded opinion on some things
but also not to take things to seriously
I mean really, I just come here to dance
ofwgktadgaf ftw d(^_^)b
yesnomaybesoRamses I literally needed less than 5 seconds for you to tell me "yes" or "no" -_-
you know that feeling when you step into the dgames social
and you feel like there's another big debate you've got to defuse in a humorous fashion
because it's important to have a well-rounded opinion on some things
but also not to take things to seriously
movies are movies, guys
But it has a book about zen and his thoughts on motorcycles! Didn't we just waste all that time with an interview? It was all right here.Really EE? If someone where to say "Manos is better than Citizen Kane", even though you might not like that opinion. It's still an opinion, just like how saying "Citizen Kane is better than Manos" is also just an opinion. There are some objective qualities to judge movies by, but they're rarley enough to deliver a final say.
I discuss music on the internet. I'm pretty sure I know the difference between objectivity and subjectivity.
Also, if you want a depressing list, check out the reader's choice for this one.
http://www.modernlibrary.com/top-100/100-best-novels/
Honestly? Their interactions are presented as if they've already occurred, and McCoy is held at arm's length. Characterization is mostly eschewed for plot and action aside from a couple dynamics, and the introduction of some minor characters that amount to world-building in lieu of the movie actually travelling through space. Every indication is that the Star Trek cycle is continuing, wherein every other movie is good.I've watched some TOS. You take the good with the bad and the ugly, pretty much. A lot of sci-fi or fantastical themes get used [and abused], causing you to grimace. Oh, another noble savages story. Oh, another Unstoppable God Being story (some of these are great, mind you, but quite a few of them run together as unimaginative and overly similar). And of course some of them just stink too much of the era's cultural drippings to stand up to a 21st century eye.
Now and then, though, you get a really brilliant episode that's just exactly what science fiction oughta be. And even the 'eh' episodes tend to have good scenes. There was an episode I saw a couple months ago that postulated about the history of the Greek Gods and their possible existence -- and not so supernatural origins. An episode where weapon advances has caused war to become so streamlined that the warring states launch their attacks via simulation, and those declared dead voluntarily walk into execution chambers. These episodes ask interesting questions, like how you might define a God, how far one ought to go in personal compromise of a greater good, and many more of both broad and direct evocation. Would you submit your personal identity in favor of a group identity, discard your human desires -- love, sex, family, personal pleasures of any kind -- in exchange for eternal life? Meanwhile, other episodes will just provide a solid adventure, often with a mystery at the heart of it, mystery being a genre that just isn't mixed with scifi enough outside of books.
Also, Kirk, McCoy, and Spock are a really great screen trio with great chemistry and interactions. I could do without the orchestral trills that underline a lot of their interaction (I get it, it's a funny scene, shut up damn it), but the interactions themselves are just damn fun to watch. I haven't seen ST:ID yet, so I'm hoping it plays with that stuff a lot more than the first reboot film did, since the story didn't really allow for that.
yes but some of them are scarymovies are movies, guys
very good book, imo.But it has a book about zen and his thoughts on motorcycles! Didn't we just waste all that time with an interview? It was all right here.
ZEN AND THE ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE
by Robert Pirsig
I went with a family of Trekkie's who rather enjoyed the movie and thought it led into the original series pretty well.By the way, I rather liked Star Trek Into Darkness. I completely understand why it wouldn't satisfy fans of the show or previous, non-Abrams movies, and I think it's well within any fan's right to complain about something they love being twisted into something almost unrecognizable just to make it appeal to more people. But divorced from that, as a fun, summer, popcorn movie, it's pretty much exactly what you could reasonably hope for. It's well acted, well paced, exciting. Funny moments are funny. Thrilling moments are thrilling. Touching moments are (to a degree) touching. Aside from being pretty sexist, it's a good, entertaining action movie. Taken with its flaws, I'd still take a dozen more movies like Into Darkness every summer over even one more Transformers.
Umm, sure?also if anybody wants an invite to the Sexytimes Conversation I think I can hook that up, due to adminhax letting you invite people past capacity or something, so lemme know
you insult the beauty that is anything EE postsquick skim through that convo but holy **** is it funny.
skim because I need to go eat lunch.