There isn't a right answer, which is why that is Raziek. I merely stated in a formal manner, that everything is subjective.
But there IS a right answer, and that's that people should be coming to these values of their own accord, not through subtle (or less than subtle) suggestion before their minds have matured enough to make a rational, informed decision.
There isn't necessarily any problem with the end result, being pride in country or religion. But it should be founded from things that MERIT pride, not simply being told you should always be proud of your country. Things LIKE the pledge are one of many small tools designed to lead you to that conclusion regardless of if the evidence is there to support it.
@Gheb
Where does the issue evolve into having this though, why is this a bad thing? I seriously don't understand the problem. You take the words brainwashing and ingratiation as some sort of blight. We live everyday with common rules and principles, what makes it different from them? I don't need to theorize or present past history when the theme is very clear.
Brainwashing IS a blight.
I'm quite staggered that you seem to have no problem with the stagnation and suppression of rational thought.
The clearest example of this concept gone wrong is the German Nazi party. It's this sort of idea taken to the extreme.
Ask yourself these questions, and it should be pretty clear:
How many Americans are proud of their country?
How many, if asked, would you expect to extensively explain why? How many cite traditions in their answer?
I'm trying to avoid generalizations here, but there's a reason people talk about the "Bible Belt".