Am I the only here who understands what Pheva is trying to get at?
She's not saying anything that just because something is "sexy" it's sexist, but that's what everyone thinks she's saying for some reason.
If the male and female versions of something are both attempting to be "sexy", it's not sexist.
If neither the male nor female versions of something are both attempting to be "sexy", it's not sexist.
If the male version isn't attempting to be "sexy", but the female version is, you could argue that it's sexist - though you could also potentially argue that it isn't. This is where the controversy should really be.
She's upset that Corrin in Fates - not in Smash - has a weird design variation that changes with Corrin's gender to make the female version more "sexy".
Okay, no need to get aggressive. Insults don't strengthen your argument - they just make the opposition less willing to listen.
Though I can see you irritation with this argument going in circles.
Edit:
Look at the top of their boots. Female Corrin has an exposed thigh where male Corrin has pants.
Now look at Smash Corrin.
She's wearing pants underneath, just like her male counterpart. No weird thigh gap just because she's female. That's what Pheva was referring to, in case you didn't know.
Now don't think I'm picking a definite side. I have mixed feelings about this topic. I just can't stand watching as people misinterpret someone's point.
Though Camilla's armor is definitely the stupidest in any FE game so far. There's no justifying that.
