Sorry CT, I'm in the mood to write, so you guys have to suffer.
I am no longer pro-choice
My co-worker considers this another step in my march towards the right, but I look at it as a step towards common sense (I know some of you consider the two to be synonymous, but bear with me).
I've been a pro-choice person all of my life. At first, I just thought it went with the territory of being a liberal. You know, as part of the standard line: pro-union, pro-gun control, pro-choice, etc. As I got older, I came to the conclusion that while I don't personally support abortion, I would support a woman's right to choose.
Lately though, and in the same way I came to my new conclusion about stem cells (and yes, once again my son had a huge influence on my change of heart), I came to recognize the pro-choice position as internally inconsistent. This process began when I was watching the News Hour with Jim Lehrer. Jim asked New York Times columnist David Brooks for his thoughts about the Democrat's policy on abortion. Brooks essentially said (I'm paraphrasing):
The Democrats have nowhere to go but further left on this issue, because if they were to ever admit that an abortion is the taking of a human life, then the debate would be over.
No matter where you stand on the issue, this statement is true. It didn't truly register in my mind until a few weeks later though, when I realized what I was actually saying by being pro choice: "I think abortion is murder, but I will support a woman's choice to commit it." That is an unbelievably wrong opinion to hold.
The bottom line is this. If you personally believe that abortion is wrong, there is no way in good conscience that you can support the right to choose it. The only debate is whether or not you believe that a life is being taken, which I think is a stretch in the first place.
Thoughts?