Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes, but also THIS; they has stated that the characters have to be the same between the two games. If you got the 3ds version version beforehand, then you'd know the full characters(outside dlcs)
Huh? I didn't say that. I just said that the 3ds version came before the Wii U version. And there were no traces of that Shadow nor Ridley on the 3ds version. So i guess that would've been expected
I wasn't talking about the roster, I was talking about when they first showed off Ridley's shadow and when they announced him as a boss.
Sorry about that. My bad.
So people was disappointed beforehand? on that note, that stage didn't appear at all in the 3ds version.
I could see that. We get the Arms rep announced next month along with FP7 who is probably Geno or Crash. The Arms rep probably get's release in June or July just like Hero and Geno or Crash get's released in September like Banjo & Kazooie.
there was nothing wrong with zip lash, juast cause it wasnt a usual chibi game doesnt mean franchise abuse
Tellingly, there's been far less jokes/bait-and-switches of that type this time. During the time of 4, those were all over the place.
It's more a case of drastic gameplay changes not necessarily being a good idea (for players used to the same gameplay). From the original devs, no less.
Exactly, the roster of Sm4sh were the same in both versions, for limitations of the 3DS the ice climbers were cut on both, so why Ridley would have been different?
To some of the people wishing for Ridley, it didn't occur to them that he'd be too big for both versions, and it was said at some point that Sak didn't like the idea of version-exclusive characters (especially since the two-version idea was the higher-ups' suggestion).
I, sap for all things amiibo I am, bought the game and played it. I'm not saying it's bad because that's what the internet hivemind declared.
Idk who Artoon/Arzest are and at this point I’m too afraid to ask
Nintendo affiliate, their output varies from "alright" to "...why?"
A little sad they didn’t remake PiT before AlphaDream went bankrupt... hope Nintendo buys them out
Well I have the feeling that the ARMS trailer will set the tone for what's to come.
just because you didnt like it doesnt mean they were deliberately being mean to the series, they just wanted to try something new and unfortunately it just did quite work for some people. story of chibi's life really
Though ultimately (heh heh), I liked what they did with Terry better, I'll admit I find the idea of continuing the Ken/Incineroar trailer should we get anymore fighting game reps to be a cute idea. It also feels like it'd be a nice compromise between a new trailer, and not having the budget to do completely new rendered trailers for each character. They could just open with Incineroar having just defeated K. Rool, BJ, and Villager, taunting the crowd in victory, when a glove attached to a coiled arm springs forth from the shadows in the sidelines and hits him square in the jaw.
Yoshi's New Island is just kind of mediocre. I wouldn't call it terrible. It just has a bad reputation over it's title theme and intro song. Not even it's entire soundtrack is as bad as people think it is. It's just like 3 or 4 songs that have that awful kazoo.
Banjo's trailer was done in that way simply because of the ties to Rare and Donkey Kong. There is absolutely no reason why ARMS needs to have a reused trailer
So in other words, you're expecting then to not learn from their mistakes?
The only way no one would be right in this case is if the ARMS character isn't any of the established characters at all, but a brand-new one from a hypothetical ARMS 2. Every ARMS fighter under the sun has been assumed to be the pick, and then some.So in other words, you're expecting then to not learn from their mistakes?
That's a fair point
And even then, ARMS 2 seems an unrealistic road to take because Sakurai likes to play the games to get a good idea of a moveset, so unless the game was literally 100% completed for months without it being released, it ain't happening.
itd be funnier if villager was the winner
Man how did you forget Hey Pikmin!, Amiibo Festival, Happy Home Designer, Mario Sports Superstars, Mario Party 10, Mario Party Star Rush, Triforce Heroes, Mario Party Top 100, Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam, and Mario Maker for 3DS.
They must've been heavily focused on making Switch games at the time, as many of those like HHD reused assets from previous entries.
Hey Pikmin, Mario Sports Superstars, Paper Jam and Top 100 slipped my mind; Happy Home Designer was ok, I swear Mario Party 10 was 2014 and I didn't think Triforce Heroes, Star Rush and Maker for 3Ds were bad.
there was nothing wrong with, hey pikmin, amiibo festival, happy home designer, triforce heroes and paper ham bros
I mean, I'd argue Hey Pikmin, Happy Home Designer, Triforce Heroes, and Paper Jam were okay games in their own right.
Given the generally agreed upon tier placement of all the characters in question, that'd actually be the most realistic option. Although, now I rescind my original pitch: It's largely the same, but instead it opens up to Villager working the crowd on top of K. Rool and Incineroar in a pile, with BJ off to the side, and then he gets beaned by the ARM.
