AnOkayDM
Smash Champion
And we still don't need another Pokémon character.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
One could start with snakes build, and then swap grenade with pokeball (which is already programmed into the game). Reskin wario bike, reflector and vine whip, adding in some adjustments. All these things are allready in the game. (at least i think)Probably not possible to do...
True...And we still don't need another Pokémon character.
When it comes to sonic games, I never listen to reviewers, since its either fast or no fast is good a stufv like that. Really annoying fan base, even amoung big sites like ign. One editor applauds it for slowing down, and then they criticize it to b too slow in the review.I still think that Lyn, Isaac, Dixie Kong, Waluigi, and Knuckles will be our five characters (though I think for the latter two there are definitely far better choices out there). However, I could easily see Ridley or Dark Samus bumping out one of the latter three.
On a sidenote, Sonic Lost World is having its reviews released, and is getting the typical reception typical of a Sonic game (review aggregate less than 7.0).
there is nothing to work off though. Mario,Luigi,Peach,and Bowser had the mainstream titles, Yoshi had Yoshi`s island, and Wario had Wario Ware and those other games that I forgot the names of. Waluigi has only been in the tennis, golf, and olympic games.Since I see no collaboration of posts nor sticky, has anyone, I KNOW someone somewhere has done this, made up a solid moveset for Waluigi? He is honestly the only newish character I would love to see. Samurai Goroh could be ok, but Waluigi is so much more interesting than everyone else I've heard.
What do you find interesting about Waluigi? *tilts my head* I'm genuinely curious.Since I see no collaboration of posts nor sticky, has anyone, I KNOW someone somewhere has done this, made up a solid moveset for Waluigi? He is honestly the only newish character I would love to see. Samurai Goroh could be ok, but Waluigi is so much more interesting than everyone else I've heard.
Since I see no collaboration of posts nor sticky, has anyone, I KNOW someone somewhere has done this, made up a solid moveset for Waluigi? He is honestly the only newish character I would love to see. Samurai Goroh could be ok, but Waluigi is so much more interesting than everyone else I've heard.
Lots of places are bashing it aside from IGN.When it comes to sonic games, I never listen to reviewers, since its either fast or no fast is good a stufv like that. Really annoying fan base, even amoung big sites like ign. One editor applauds it for slowing down, and then they criticize it to b too slow in the review.
Still gettin it though...
If you'd just look at the previous page... http://www.youtube.com/user/marioking64DS/videos
And, seriously? It's like people that hate Wario because he is silly. I like that he completes another set of characters as Wario's "partner" but not necessarily his brother. He has appeared in most of the Mario sports games and has the stuff to make a very unique move set, I'd believe.What do you find interesting about Waluigi? *tilts my head* I'm genuinely curious.
With that logic, you could give his moveset to the Mii. Or Daisy. What does Waluigi have all to himself that makes him interesting?Waluigi has so many appearances in the Mario series, whether or not you feel them unimportant, and has the potential for a very cool move set using all sorts of sports items, skills, etc. Based on Sakurai's picking, I see no reason he wouldn't pick Waluigi himself. (His whole argument of "every character I put in the game was important and had a good reason" look at Doctor Mario...)
Why?I absolutely love the Mario RPG series, but there should be in no way Paper Mario as a playable character. I almost take it as an insult that it's suggested.
So unique I can think of at least two other characters that could have it.And, seriously? It's like people that hate Wario because he is silly. I like that he completes another set of characters as Wario's "partner" but not necessarily his brother. He has appeared in most of the Mario sports games and has the stuff to make a very unique move set, I'd believe.
Villager is the main protagonist of one of Nintendo's highest selling franchises.Please don't use those as excuses. Wii Fit Trainer is in Smash; the villager is a generic character that is now in Smash; Rob is a series of generic robots; and even Game and Watch fits in the same category too.
Call Wii Fit Trainer, Villager, ROB, and G&W generic all you want. They are the main characters of there own series (besides ROB). Mario is a generic Italian plumber, therefore he should not be in the game because he is generic. Link is a generic Swordsman, therefore he should not be in the game because he is generic. You can call them generic all you want, but it won`t change the fact that they have large relevance to there respective series. Waluigi has only ever been in the sports games and saying we could give him a sports based moveset is amateur at best, basing a entire character after a spinoff series where EVERYONE can do what they can do will not do the character justice. Waluigi doesn`t have a set personality and we have no clue at what he can actually do in terms of combat.Please don't use those as excuses. Wii Fit Trainer is in Smash; the villager is a generic character that is now in Smash; Rob is a series of generic robots; and even Game and Watch fits in the same category too.
I absolutely love the Mario RPG series, but there should be in no way Paper Mario as a playable character. I almost take it as an insult that it's suggested.
Waluigi has so many appearances in the Mario series, whether or not you feel them unimportant, and has the potential for a very cool move set using all sorts of sports items, skills, etc. Based on Sakurai's picking, I see no reason he wouldn't pick Waluigi himself. (His whole argument of "every character I put in the game was important and had a good reason" look at Doctor Mario...)
That IS pretty much exactly what they've done for, you know, every character in Smash. Give them moves from things they haven't even necessarily done and made it work. I mean, Waluigi would probably be more item based like the villager or Game and Watch, but that doesn't make them NOT unique, because they still have their own items that do different things.With that logic, you could give his moveset to the Mii. Or Daisy. What does Waluigi have all to himself that makes him interesting?
Why?
Why would you want more clones? also, your saying that because Paper Mario is different we should add Paper Luigi and Paper Peach, well by that logic we should add in every pokemon because every pokemon is different or we should add in every iteration of Adult Link/Toon Link/Young Link because they are all different. Please remember that you are justifying adding in a character with no history or definable skills over a character that you have admitted already has properties that could be worked off of.That IS pretty much exactly what they've done for, you know, every character in Smash. Give them moves from things they haven't even necessarily done and made it work. I mean, Waluigi would probably be more item based like the villager or Game and Watch, but that doesn't make them NOT unique, because they still have their own items that do different things.
Because he is really just Mario? Doctor Mario could have been potentially more unique than Mario as well, but I would like as few clones, if any, at all. And even if you mention the fact that his is paper and can do different things, by that logic, why don't we add all of the Paper Mario versions of the Mario series characters? I think one of any character is enough.
Along those lines,I honestly hate that Toon Link exists. I mean, he kinda fits, but I really don't feel that he is a necessary addition to the Zelda series, especially considering that the several iterations of kid Link are all pretty different, not just Windwaker series.
Why would you want more clones? also, your saying that because Paper Mario is different we should add Paper Luigi and Paper Peach, well by that logic we should add in every pokemon because every pokemon is different or we should add in every iteration of Adult Link/Toon Link/Young Link because they are all different. Please remember that you are justifying adding in a character with no history or definable skills over a character that you have admitted already has properties that could be worked off of.
Do you mean the toon link series? also, by that logic, Adult Link isn`t necessary because Young Link is different then Adult Link.
Waluigi doesn`t have a set personality and we have no clue at what he can actually do in terms of combat.
Explain the importance in characters like Roy and Doctor Mario, please. Roy was used almost solely to promote his game. Marth does a better job at that, being in several more games, especially now, and stands as more of Fire Emblem's flagship character.Villager is the main protagonist of one of Nintendo's highest selling franchises.
Wii Fit Trainer is the icon of one of Nintendo's highest selling franchises (sold better than even Brawl in Japan).
ROB represents the last of Nintendo's toy making heritage, and was used as trojan horse to get America stores to stock the NES after the game market crash.
Mr. Game & Watch is the mascot to a line of handhelds that lasted for a decade.
All of these characters are far more important to Nintendo history than Waluigi.
Roy is the protagonist of his own gameWhat, really? What personality does he lack? He has a simple, selfish badguy mindset and wants to do better than others? And half the cast was like that. They are given moves that sometimes represent things they do in other games that look like they might fit and that is reasonable for us most of the time.
Explain the importance in characters like Roy and Doctor Mario, please. Roy was used almost solely to promote his game. Marth does a better job at that, being in several more games, especially now, and stands as more of Fire Emblem's flagship character.
And Jigglypuff? Just a popular Pokemon from back then that doesn't really have important in-game or in the show or movies? She appeared a bit in the show, but can you seriously call her important enough to use in Smash? Probably not.
If popularity works over importance, like Jigglypuff, why wouldn't Waluigi be ok if he was liked well enough? There really is nothing to argue here. I started by asking about Waluigi initially and people ask about his importance? Read what I said prior to this and please understand.
Roy is the protagonist of his own game
Dr. Mario is the protagonist of his own game
by that logic, all pokemon should be added because almost all 700+ pokemon are on equal basis of importance.
And that excuse works because...?That IS pretty much exactly what they've done for, you know, every character in Smash. Give them moves from things they haven't even necessarily done and made it work. I mean, Waluigi would probably be more item based like the villager or Game and Watch, but that doesn't make them NOT unique, because they still have their own items that do different things.
He's not though. Any decent Paper Mario moveset would have him play nothing like Mario, so people claiming he'd be a clone are simply wrong. He could just as easily not have been Mario in the games, but a new character, and then no one would be whining about it.Because he is really just Mario? Doctor Mario could have been potentially more unique than Mario as well, but I would like as few clones, if any, at all. And even if you mention the fact that his is paper and can do different things, by that logic, why don't we add all of the Paper Mario versions of the Mario series characters? I think one of any character is enough.
Yeah, well. A child Link makes much more sense than an adult Link, considering he's far more common. And yeah, it could've been any version of Young Link, but it makes sense to me that it's Toonie, since OoT was the only game to have both a young and adult version, and since Melee Link has been based more off his TP design.Along those lines,I honestly hate that Toon Link exists. I mean, he kinda fits, but I really don't feel that he is a necessary addition to the Zelda series, especially considering that the several iterations of kid Link are all pretty different, not just Windwaker series.
Jigglypuff is important to Smash Bros., even if she's not important to Pokémon anymore. Importance does matter. That's why we didn't get Zant or Midna.If popularity works over importance, like Jigglypuff, why wouldn't Waluigi be ok if he was liked well enough? There really is nothing to argue here. I started by asking about Waluigi initially and people ask about his importance? Read what I said prior to this and please understand.
It's the principle of the matter being that he is another Mario at all. Completely different or not, I think Smash would be better off not duplicating the same character, no matter how different, to fill up character slots. That is what I was saying with Link as well. I feel the Zelda series would be perfect with Link, Zelda, and Ganon. No Toon Link, and no Sheik.He's not though. Any decent Paper Mario moveset would have him play nothing like Mario, so people claiming he'd be a clone are simply wrong. He could just as easily not have been Mario in the games, but a new character, and then no one would be whining about it.
Yeah, why don't we? They could all play pretty differently if we thought about it.
.
I think that's rather close-minded, but you're entitled to that opinion.It's the principle of the matter being that he is another Mario at all. Completely different or not, I think Smash would be better off not duplicating the same character, no matter how different, to fill up character slots. That is what I was saying with Link as well. I feel the Zelda series would be perfect with Link, Zelda, and Ganon. No Toon Link, and no Sheik.
I think when we only have five potential slots left, they should be given out very sparingly. To me, Waluigi doesn't warrant a slot when there are more important and unique characters to be found in the Mario universe alone.To be completely honest, even if I hate the character, I wouldn't mind at all if they are in as long as they are fun to play. I was mad about Wii Fit Trainer and the villager, but almost immediately after I realised that they would probably play very fun. And I actually think that Toad, Bowser Jr., AND Waluigi would as well.
I've no need to explain myself for anything else, as it is all irrelevant. I have my own hopes that Waluigi can exist as a playable character in Smash someday.
Ok, seriously, stop. You aren't making any sense, nor are you even considering what I'm saying. I didn't say anything about those characters mattering at all because they are "protagonists" of their game.
You asked me to explain why they had importance, so I explained that they are protagonist of there own game making them atleast more important then a filler character like Waluigi who`s only purpose is to give the spin off that one extra character.Explain the importance in characters like Roy and Doctor Mario, please
you said yourself that Jiggs shouldn`t be in smash because she`s not important enough, so popularity doesn`t define a characters placement according to you.And, realistically, Pokemon are on an obvious unbalance. Popularity has a big factor as well as importance, it seems, and not all of the Pokemon are liked similarly.
also, you can say that with about every pokemon in smash:And Jigglypuff? Just a popular Pokemon from back then that doesn't really have important in-game or in the show or movies? She appeared a bit in the show, but can you seriously call her important enough to use in Smash? Probably not.
Honestly it is quite ridiculous. People are spending more time arguing against another persons personal taste than making suggestions of their own. If someone wants to suggest something they should be able to do so without fear of being scolded for their choice. After all, popularity is determined by numbers. Not words.Why are you guys arguing? Waluigi is getting worked on outside the P:M team, so if you want to add him later when the clone engine is (not for a long time, I'm sure) released in some fashion you can do so. You guys have been arguing for just about the entirety of page 33 of this thread, just take it to private messaging if you're gonna keep doing this ****.
Then should we set up a poll thread? All you can post is character suggestions?Honestly it is quite ridiculous. People are spending more time arguing against another persons personal taste than making suggestions of their own. If someone wants to suggest something they should be able to do so without fear of being scolded for their choice. After all, popularity is determined by numbers. Not words.
why not make a separate thread for char suggestions and use this thread to talk numbers and codingThen should we set up a poll thread? All you can post is character suggestions?
Whoever makes the thread can keep track of votes in the OP. That way we know who the most popular characters are.why not make a separate thread for char suggestions and use this thread to talk numbers and coding
Whoever makes the thread can keep track of votes in the OP. That way we know who the most popular characters are.
People can get five votes: one for each slot.
Like ChronoBound said earlier, polls can easily be overrun by organized fanbases. It would be best for a P:M official to set up a poll with restrictions such as "sign up date".Then should we set up a poll thread? All you can post is character suggestions?
Makes sense. Hopefully they do so soon.Like ChronoBound said earlier, polls can easily be overrun by organized fanbases. It would be best for a P:M official to set up a poll with restrictions such as "sign up date".
Do this, but try to format it a little closer to the way 820 did when following my suggestion, as yours was a little too cluttered. Just to stay clean and consistent.I can make the OP using my older post as a base (and updated based on running arguments), but I'd rather not have to keep track of votes