NO. Those are generic Yoshis. They aren't given any sort of characterization, they aren't recurring characters, there's nothing that sets them from the rest of the species.
The one known as "Yoshi" (a.k.a. the green one from this game) is a recurring character, is Mario's close friend, and is the 7th Star Child (the other 6 being Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Wario, and DK (whether it's Cranky or modern DK is unknown)).
No characterization; no distinction; generic.
Also impossible to tell if these Yoshis are the same ones between games.
Aha! I think I understand you a bit more now, you're one of those folks who try to put story, reasoning, and continuity in titles that obviously don't have any. I'm curious to hear your fan theories about the "ongoing, continued, and connected" story between every Mario game are.
Although I still don't get where you're getting that Green Yoshi has more characterization and distinction from the other colored Yoshis in the games Yoshi appears in. They've always been treated equally in the main Mario titles and Yoshi series. Lack of characterization? Many Nintendo characters lack characterization so the player can better connect with the game world (ex: Link, Mario, all of the Pokemon protagonists, Villager, etc.). Recurring characters? I'm pretty sure I've seen Red Yoshi appear in more titles than Super Mario World, It doesn't matter if they're the "same" character or not (ex: Goomba is a recurring enemy in the Mario series, it doesn't matter if it's the "same" Goomba or not). Nothing sets them apart? I'm
pretty sure most people can see that the Yoshis are each a different color. Unless you're color-blind that is.
Generic 2-player filler.
Just like Pink Donkey Kong Jr.
Except for the fact that the other colored Yoshis are recurrent and have been shown as individual characters in various titles.
I said Yoshi was the only defined Yoshi that is generic in design.
That's a personal opinion, I myself don't find Yoshi to have a generic design. He's quite unique looking and a highly recognizable character for most people, even for those who don't play video games.
Luma isn't a character. Lumas are summons that Rosalina use for fighting.
For not being a character, it's quite interesting to see Luma's name as a Smash newcomer.
Yoshi represents both the Yoshi character and the species.
The Waddle Dee species are already represented through enemies in Smash Run.
The Toad species is already represented through Peach's Neutral Special.
This is a matter of opinion.
We don't need to represent the species; we need to represent the characters. It's not a generic Toad that's become a spin-off star like Luigi, Wario, Peach, and Yoshi (both the character and species) before him; it's Captain Toad. It's not a generic Waddle Dee that's become a prominent character as of late; it's Bandana Dee.
Again, this is a matter of personal opinion. I for one would rather see the original designs the default as they are far more iconic and relevant and have the alternate designs (Like Blue/Yellow Toad, Bandana/Sailor Waddle Dee) as costumes.
It doesn't have to directly state it; he's shown to be Dedede's right-hand man in Revenge of the King as well as Returns to Dream Land, where he is assisting Dedede in chasing after Kirby in the beginning.
I wasn't going to use the "beats up other Waddle Dees" excuse; Dedede beats up Waddle Dees and they're his minions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure it's been stated that Waddle Dees are simply peaceful citizens of Dream Land and not all of them serve King Dedede.
.......what the Hell?
Meta Knight was designed as derivative of Kirby's design. THEY ARE THE SAME SPECIES/RACE. Meta Knight is a palette swap wearing armor to hide the fact he's a palette swap!
That's literally no different than Captain Toad wearing adventuring gear and swinging a pickaxe!
Show anyone these two pics and I'm sure they won't mistake the two:
Show anyone these two pics and I'm sure they'll think they're the same character:
There's a big difference.
Oi, you're killing me here.
Dr. Mario is Mario. Of bloody course Dr. Mario wouldn't get in over the standard Mario
Exactly, this is what I've been saying regarding the standard Toad and Waddle Dee!
Bandana Dee? He's not a generic Waddle Dee. He's a specific Waddle Dee.
Give me a legitimate reason why, the ACTUAL CHARACTER that is prominent and supported by fans would NOT get in over random generic Waddle Dee #47 from Kirby Squeak Squad. Go on, do it. You haven't thus far, but maybe you'll surprise me with a good reason now.
Because Waddle Dee as an iconic and recurring character throughout the entire Kirby franchise and it make no sense to limit him to only Bandana Dee's look? Again, we would probably get his bandanna, sailor hat, and other headgear as costumes if he became a playable character.
No, you obviously don't get it at all.
Bandana Waddle Dee isn't being claimed as "extremely unique" solely because of the damn bandana.
What is being claimed (and what is entirely accurate) is that Bandana Waddle Dee is a DEFINED MAJOR CHARACTER that is distinct from the generic Waddle Dees.
The bandana is just a major part of his distinction. He's the only Dee to have one, or at least was until Rainbow Curse. Though it could just be that he has his own posse where he's the leader.
So yes, he would be generic without it; without it, he's just a regular Spear Waddle Dee.
Again, characterization means nothing in a title like Smash. You've admitted that Bandana Waddle Dee is Waddle Dee wearing a bandana design-wise. You've even admitted that he's not the only Bandana Waddle Dee in the Kirby games anymore. Why is it so hard to see the classic Waddle Dee design as the default costume and his bandana as an alternate should we get him as a playable character in Smash? It's like you think Waddle Dee is somehow a boring character without his bandana on.