TumblrFamous
Smash Hero
Lucas most definitely. That's the one that would be without a doubt DLC.Which veterans do you think will be DLC if time constraints come up as a problem?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Lucas most definitely. That's the one that would be without a doubt DLC.Which veterans do you think will be DLC if time constraints come up as a problem?
Well, first we have to consider which veterans they'd cut under time constraints. Besides the obvious 3 who are out anyway (Squitle, Ivy, and Snake), the prime candidates of Lucas, Wolf, Falco, maybe Jiggs but only as a last resort (Lucas and one of the spacies had already been cut and they needed someone else as well). Jiggs especially would be a good DLC character if she isn't on the main roster.Which veterans do you think will be DLC if time constraints come up as a problem?
Mewtwo and Lucas seem the most obvious imo.Which veterans do you think will be DLC if time constraints come up as a problem?
I think that's a highly debated subject.Falco is more popular, more important to the Star Fox series
He isn't the main antagonist of Star Fox, he is your rival that you got to fight & once in a while is an anti-hero (He may be that way in future titles). The main antagonists would be someone like Andross, Aparoid Queen, or the Anglar Emperor. Thats not to say Wolf isn't important, hes got the merit.I think that's a highly debated subject.
I'm not a fan of Star Fox, but what I've heard, I personally think Wolf is actually more important as one of the main antagonists of Star Fox.
Falco does appear but in the ending. I wouldn't really say its a cameo but more of "Hey guise, I'm still here! Remember me? I'm back!"I think that's a highly debated subject.
From what I've heard, Slippy does more than Falco, especially in one of the games on the Gamecube where I've heard that Falco isn't in at all other than a cameo.
Prior to Melee, there were only two Star Fox games, SNES and 64. Wolf wasn't even in SNES, whereas Falco was prominent in both and was seen as a friendly rival. Wolf was only in two (optional) missions as a boss in 64, and he was kinda of a lead up to Andross anyway.From what I've heard, Slippy does more than Falco, especially in one of the games on the Gamecube where I've heard that Falco isn't in at all other than a cameo. Like I said though, that's from what I've heard as I've never played any of those games.
Wait...I think that, despite the leak mentioning Lucas having a strong likelihood to be cut, that Wolf is actually the one gone, because it resonates with the rest of the cast nearby, the 'twosies' as I call them(Samus/ZSS, Pit/Palutena, Fox/Falco, DK/Diddy). Otherwise, we'd have a three-set in the midst of a bunch of two-setters, which might be strange.
I suppose if Ridley was announced another Metroid character has to make it in.Wait...
I apologize if I'm missing something here, but are you actually implying that they would cut Wolf because it would make the character selection screen look slightly (not really) odd?
He isn't the main antagonist of Star Fox, he is your rival that you got to fight & once in a while is an anti-hero (He may be that way in future titles). The main antagonists would be someone like Andross, Aparoid Queen, or the Anglar Emperor. Thats not to say Wolf isn't important, hes got the merit.
Falco does appear but in the ending. I wouldn't really say its a cameo but more of "Hey guise, I'm still here! Remember me? I'm back!"
As for Slippy, he's appear in every game to date & made Landmaster, Reflector, Blaster, Arwing, & Blue Marine.
Like I said, I've never played Star Fox so I don't really know their roles too well in their series.Prior to Melee, there were only two Star Fox games, SNES and 64. Wolf wasn't even in SNES, whereas Falco was prominent in both and was seen as a friendly rival. Wolf was only in two (optional) missions as a boss in 64, and he was kinda of a lead up to Andross anyway.
Don't remember much about Adventure and Assault, didn't like them. Adventure might as well not be a Star Fox game since it only has few elements from it and it wasn't originally a Star Fox game, but an original IP from Rare. But if you wanna go with it, Falco did appear briefly in the end, with Wolf completely absent. Don't remember which of the two had more prominence in Assault or Command. (The latter of which I only played briefly, but I remember seeing Falco a lot :x.)
I'd say Falco is more important than Wolf.
You pretty much have it down!Like I said, I've never played Star Fox so I don't really know their roles too well in their series.
I was basically told this,
Falco: Annoying wing-man that acts like he doesn't need your help, but really does. Fox's friendly rival.
Slippy: Clumsy and is always needing help, however he excels in machines.
Krystal: Debuted in Adventure(I believe) and ever since became one of the most important and re-occurring characters in Star Fox.
Wolf: Fox's main rival and is the only main villain that could translate well into smash.
I repeat, this is just what I've been told and I haven't done too much research due to my lack of interest in the series.
Relax, I ain't gonna bite...unless of course, you call Fox McCloud "Star Fox" then thats differentI repeat, this is just what I've been told and I haven't done too much research due to my lack of interest in the series.
Mewtwo, King K.Rool, and Impa should get in regulary.If the roster is 47 characters with a random box we have 48 boxes. Four rows of twelve. So I would imagine four DLC's at least to start.
Mewtwo, King K. Rool, Sceptile, and Ghirahim are my guesses.
Eh, I don't think comparing the main antagonist of the Metroid series to the villain of one Zelda game is an accurate comparison.Honestly, I think that Ghirahim is in the same boat as Ridley. Neither of them are actually very likely, they just have very vocal supporters who want to see them added for various reasons and will furiously deny that lack of likelihood. They're the two really heavy fan picks that not only do I suspect will not be playable in this Smash, but I doubt will ever grace Smash as playable characters, regardless of potentially numerous future installments. Even having noticed this, I still choose to support Ghirahim, regardless of his questionable status.
If I may ask, why not? I don't think simply because Ridley has longevity and more appearances that he is therefore more suitable, nor is he more likely.Eh, I don't think comparing the main antagonist of the Metroid series to the villain of one Zelda game is an accurate comparison.
I think with all the Skyward Sword representation, he has a somewhat decent chance. And this is coming from someone who doesn't care for Ghirahim at all.Mewtwo, King K.Rool, and Impa should get in regulary.
Ghirahim I really don't think stands much of a chance.
Again, Impa was also in Skyward Sword. She'd be a better choice.I think with all the Skyward Sword representation, he has a somewhat decent chance. And this is coming from someone who doesn't care for Ghirahim at all.
it's the space pirate ship from kid icarus uprising- and last, what is this from?
View attachment 16275
Initially when I saw it, I thought crazy Kirby weapon. But I'm really not sure what it is. I thought if it were something Xenoblade related, the place would be in a frenzy. Any schooling from you fine people would be greatly appreciated.
I don'tWhy does everyone on SmashBoards have feelings for Hades? Is it like that stork thing?
I'm sorry, but hold your horses. Wolf has one advantage over Paper Mario and Dark Pit: Veteran. Cutting a popular villain out of a game is like killing the hero of a story. Removing Wolf would not only be lame with your reasons, but would create some serious hell like what happened to Mewtwo and RoyDark Pit wouldn't really have much chance of getting in anyway. Sakurai said already that he doesn't want duplicates of any character. Which means he wouldn't want any characters with the same move sets or characters that are basically the same. With that said, Characters like Paper Mario and Dark Pit have no chance, and neither does Wolf. I believe that they would bring back Falco, but maybe change his move set a little.
Ness and Lucas has same Final Smash with some tweaks. Toon Link and Link has the same Final Smash as well and so does Zelda and Sheik. Your point being?They all have the same final smash
I never said that they are "automatically going to be cut" because they are similar. I said that I think Wolf may be cut. God you kids need to learn to read.
You just basically admitted that Wolf needs to be cut right there. Please come back when you are smarter with your posts. YOU need to learn to read what you type.With that said, Characters like Paper Mario and Dark Pit have no chance, and neither does Wolf. I believe that they would bring back Falco, but maybe change his move set a little.
Squirtle, Ivysaur, Snake, Lucas, Mewtwo, RoyWhich veterans do you think will be DLC if time constraints come up as a problem?
Seriously Diddy, enough with your obsession on Impa. It's not even gonna happen and Ghirahim still has a chance for DLC....a chance higher than Impa that isMewtwo, King K.Rool, and Impa should get in regulary.
Ghirahim I really don't think stands much of a chance.
Ridley confirmed.it's the space pirate ship from kid icarus uprising
Big, purply, flappy winged, Space pirate related trophy shown in the E3 footage?it's the space pirate ship from kid icarus uprising
Really just goes to show much FE has expanded since Melee and how beloved a franchise it has become over the years.Edit: Darn, posted already.
Nonetheless it is interesting to note the most well-received veterans were both Fire Emblem characters.
First of all, careful about the double post.Bandanna Dee ain't happening, because Kid Icarus is getting the treatment that Kirby got in Brawl. So I expect all Kirby content to be fairly standard in SSB4. Perhaps DLC though...
NO. Those are generic Yoshis. They aren't given any sort of characterization, they aren't recurring characters, there's nothing that sets them from the rest of the species.
The four Yoshis (Green, Red, Blue, Yellow) that debuted in SMW are clearly individual characters, as seen in gameplay text and in the ending (along with the newly hatched rescued Yoshis).
No characterization; no distinction; generic.
The Yoshi group that consistently helps Baby Mario rescue Baby Luigi in the Yoshi Island series are clearly separate characters. They each take turns carrying Baby Mario and in later games the other Babies.
Generic 2-player filler.
Red Yoshi in the upcoming Yoshi Wooly World is clearly a separate character from Green Yoshi.
I said Yoshi was the only defined Yoshi that is generic in design. There are others such as Yoshi Kid from Paper Mario TTYD, Boshi, the Village Elder in Paper Mario, etc. "Yoshi" is the only defined Yoshi that isn't any different in design from the generic Green Yoshi species.Aside from that, why do you claim that only Green Yoshi is the only "defined" Yoshi? No where in the games do they claim that Green Yoshi is Mario's only Yoshi friend. That's only shown in outside media and fan wikis/fan works.
LOL. This is a clear case of ambiguous language fallacy.As someone who works in the industry, I can tell you that design does matter when it come to game and character development. But don't take that from me, here's a past example direct from Nintendo where character design clearly did matter:
http://www.nowgamer.com/news/1695711/why_no_peach_in_new_super_mario_bros_u.html
Luma isn't a character. Lumas are summons that Rosalina use for fighting.When you put in a species character in a title like Smash Bros, they are representing their species. Yoshi represents the entire Yoshi species, Pikachu represents the entire Pikachu species, Luma represents the entire Luma species, etc. Individuality/personality doesn't matter when it comes to Smash Bros. during development. Most of that is left up to interpretation by the player; an example is SSE in Brawl where there are no spoken lines of dialogue and most of the story was left up to player's imaginations.
It doesn't have to directly state it; he's shown to be Dedede's right-hand man in Revenge of the King as well as Returns to Dream Land, where he is assisting Dedede in chasing after Kirby in the beginning.As for Bandana Dee being an "elite" member of his species, nowhere in the Kirby games is it stated he's any different than his fellow Waddle Dee beyond being an ally of Kirby and friends. The "he beats up other Waddles Dees!" isn't an answer. Other Waddle Dees have done the same thing when playable in Super Star(Ultra) and Canvas Curse.
...He's barely different from Mario in design.Yes, it's true that Luigi started out as a mere palette swap, but he was given a redesign for Super Mario Bros. 2 (USA). That design carried over and was used for Luigi's likeness in Nintendo's media/ads and future titles defining him as a separate character individually and design-wise before Smash 64 came out.
Luigi was defined as a Nintendo All-Star. He also has a unique name that isn't Green Mario.
.......what the Hell?As you listed, Meta Knight has more differences from Kirby than a simple palette swap or piece of clothing. He wasn't designed as derivative of Kirby' design, but having a mysterious resemblance in body shape and size. Like Luigi, he has enough difference in design to be considered unique. He also has a unique name rather than being called Masked Blue Kirby.
Oi, you're killing me here.So is Bandanna Dee. He's literally Waddle Dee's design wearing a piece of clothing and a slight color tint depending on the game. Same with Yellow Toad and Blue Toad. Or Red Yoshi. Or Metal Mario. They're palette swaps of another character's design even if they a separate defined individual in their games. As you can see, derivative character's utilize a "color/clothing/power" "original character's name" naming scheme. That's just how character design works. Can a derivative character design get their own slot? Yes, see Dr. Mario. But would Dr. Mario get in over Mario?
No, you obviously don't get it at all.Now don't get me wrong, I think Waddle Dee would be an interesting choice for Smash Bros. I just find it odd that his supporters claim he's extremely unique with a bandana on while also claiming he's boring and generic without one on. It's like if Toad supporter said Blue Toad is amazing looking while demonizing the classic Toad design.
Not at all. I think Chrom will be the last revealed newcomer and either Ness or Falcon to be the last revealed veteran. I'm not sure about mewtwo being in game to be honest, and I already gave up on Ridley a long time ago.Topic of the weekend :
In order to tenfold hype, do you think Mewtwo and Ridley will be respectivly the latest veteran and newcomer to be revealed a few time before the 3DS version release ?
well some people seem to think Jigglypuff is cut so yes it seems some people believe originals will be cut.Why do so many people on Smashboards think that "either" Ness or Lucas will be cut, like it's not already certain who wouldbe cut if there can be only one.
Even without the Gematsu leak mentioning Lucas specifically, do people really think Sakurai would remove a character that's been in every single Smash game?
Well, think about it. Smash is game designed for the purpose of gathering some of Nintendo's biggest All-Stars. Therefore, a character like Ridley, who is a main antagonist of a prominent Nintendo series, is a viable choice for the game. It's the same reason that we got characters like Bowser and Ganondorf. They're the main antagonists of some of Nintendo's biggest series. They're basically All-Stars, so they got into Smash. There's not much of a difference between Ridley and those two.If I may ask, why not? I don't think simply because Ridley has longevity and more appearances that he is therefore more suitable, nor is he more likely.
I think the fact that you said that kinda means you may be over obsessingand I'm definitely not over obsessing.
Well both Ness and, I believe, Jiggs were considered to be cut at one time. They were not cut obviously so the question then is, was it their status as originals that saved them? Or lucky circumstances? I personally think the latter, so the idea that originals must be untouchable is a little off base to me.Why do so many people on Smashboards think that "either" Ness or Lucas will be cut, like it's not already certain who wouldbe cut if there can be only one.
Even without the Gematsu leak mentioning Lucas specifically, do people really think Sakurai would remove a character that's been in every single Smash game?