Starcutter
Resident Beedrill
Honestly think it's about time Marth was starter. He deserves it anyways.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Marth has a very good chance of being a starter if we get a Fire Emblem newcomer. Although, it could just be Ike again, tradition.Honestly think it's about time Marth was starter. He deserves it anyways.
I think Chrom would be the starter, alongside or without Ike, and Tactician could be one or the other. Anyone else, IMO, would most likely be unlockable.Marth has a very good chance of being a starter if we get a Fire Emblem newcomer. Although, it could just be Ike again, tradition.
That brings up a really interesting point. Does a newcomer generate that much more hype as a starter?No reason to hide the hype-generating newcomer, either.
I wish I could have the determination to leave until the game launches, but I am not powerful enough. But I agree, my most fond memories of Smash Brothers have to do with unlocking things that I didn't expect in the game. Such as Jigglypuff, Ganondorf, or Wolf respectively.That brings up a really interesting point. Does a newcomer generate that much more hype as a starter?
I remember when I was a kid, I always thought the secret stuff was the most exciting. I'll still probably leave the internet for a few weeks after the game launches, to avoid having every single secret spoiled for me.
Yeah, I had every hidden fighter spoiled for me in Melee, thanks to my overeager curiosity which compelled me to start flipping through the official player's guide in a store. All except for Roy, who I didn't expect because I had never heard of him and therefore didn't care (which is probably why I didn't even notice his name in the book). But my fondest memories of that game had mainly to do with discovering all the fun little secrets, encountering characters from games I had never played, and obsessively reading all the trophy descriptions to learn whatever I could about them. When I was a kid, discovering those things in Melee, and to a lesser degree, in SSB64, was like exploring a world.I wish I could have the determination to leave until the game launches, but I am not powerful enough. But I agree, my most fond memories of Smash Brothers have to do with unlocking things that I didn't expect in the game. Such as Jigglypuff, Ganondorf, or Wolf respectively.
I managed to unlock all the characters without looking up a strategy guide except for Game & Watch. When I read up his name on GameFaqs, I expected a Professor Layton-esque character, someone with a fob watch and fought with sabres.Yeah, I had every hidden fighter spoiled for me in Melee, thanks to my overeager curiosity and flipping through the official player's guide in a store. All except for Roy, who I didn't expect because I had never heard of him and therefore didn't care. But my fondest memories of that game had mainly to do with discovering all the fun little secrets, encountering characters from games I had never played, and obsessively reading all the trophy descriptions to learn whatever I could about them. When I was a kid, discovering those things in Melee, and to a lesser degree, in SSB64, was like exploring a world.
I think I had every character accidentally spoiled for me in Brawl, thanks to the internet and sites like IGN posting every leaked secret in their headlines, except maybe Toon Link (I think? I don't quite remember.), and ROB, who I had really wanted but didn't expect thanks to the SSE enemy ROBs. It wasn't quite the same as Melee since I was older, and somehow the trophies didn't seem as interesting, but it was still fun.
I wish I could recapture that feeling.
Haha, I had a somewhat similar experience, with Ness. Back during the N64 era, I wasn't on the internet much, or maybe there just wasn't much of an internet, so when I looked up how to unlock Ness, all the info I got on him was in text format (in Nintendo Power, or something similar). Reading about a psychic warrior who fought aliens in a game called EarthBound, or actually, it may have literally just been the name Ness, from the SNES game EarthBound, brought to my twelve-year-old mind images of some powerful hulking creature, like something you'd see in a SNES fighting game or RPG. Boy was I surprised when I unlocked the fire shooting kid with the purple shorts and the bizarre accent.I managed to unlock all the characters without looking up a strategy guide except for Game & Watch. When I read up his name on GameFaqs, I expected a Professor Layton-esque character, someone with a fob watch and fought with sabres.
Confusion and hilarity ensued.
This is exactly what happened to me. When I thought Mr. Game & Watch, I thought something akin to Mr. peanut.I managed to unlock all the characters without looking up a strategy guide except for Game & Watch. When I read up his name on GameFaqs, I expected a Professor Layton-esque character, someone with a fob watch and fought with sabres.
Confusion and hilarity ensued.
I'm disappointed that a lot of supporters for Dixie Kong after Tropical Freeze's announcement was the result of a bandwagon. Dixie Kong really is a strong character choice that already had plenty of good reasons to add her and it is great to see her return in Tropical Freeze; but a large portion of her support due to the announcement reeks of the "recency" logic. People really should not have expected Dixie's confirmation before Diddy Kong was confirmed.So it was just another case of a character fad coming and going.
Though I could make arguments that Dixie can do more then simply cater to the dunces.
Only Ridley and Palutena could even qualify as hypetrains characters (although I can understand Shulk). Shadow is a horrible choice for a third-party (because Sonic does not deserve a second rep and even if we do get one, it should be Tails or Dr. Eggman) and Krystal is a divisive character.Ridley, Chrom, Shulk, Shadow, Krystal, and Palutena in my opinion
I can assure you that a lot of people want Chrom, don't assume that Smashboards represents the world. For example, Greninja brought hype in Pokemon communities, more than it did here. On the other hand, Little Mac brought hype in the west but not much in Japan.Chrom is the epitome of the bandwagon character; while there is a minority that do actually like him (such as Opossum), such cannot be said for most people.
Especially the YouTube community.Chrom is the epitome of the bandwagon character; while there is a minority that do actually like him (such as Opossum), such cannot be said for most people. I guarantee that most people support Chrom because of sales, recency, the false assumption that Chrom saved Fire Emblem (Chrom didn't, it was the game itself, which is not the same thing), being the latest lord, making a "proper" (aka terrible and heavily unnecessary) replacement for a perfectly well-made character, oh and buttocks on mouse pads. Chrom was one of the most expected characters to show up since he was shown and may end up being the worst addition to this game. Unless Sakurai has someone seriously special to show off for Chrom (which may or may not happen), he's not going to generate hype for this game.
World-wide? Mewtwo, K. Rool, Mewtwo, Palutena, Mewtwo, Mewtwo and Mewtwo. Also, don't forget Mewtwo.Which characters are hypetrains?
They want the character to be more likely so they make up ****. It's how Smashboards works.I wasn't even aware "Chrom saved the Fire Emblem franchise" was a thing.
That's silly.
How does that even work? In the game itself, the player's Avatar does all the real work. In terms of advertising, I imagine that the mysterious "Marth" character generated more interest in the game itself (as Marth is the most popular and well-known character in the series and "Marth" clearly was hiding something").
Why do people try so hard to justify their characters? Can't they just say they want something and be done with it?
"I think they should increase his wingspan-"Meta Knight has got to be back, but they should change his moveset so that it leans more toward his boss appearances in the Kirby Games and have his wings be more of a prominent force in his moves, rather than just for flying.
I made a video about it too, for anyone that's interested...
Pac Man would probably light the industry on fire.Which characters are hypetrains?
Do you agree or disagree with me?The thing about Mewtwo is that there is no newcomers that has the potential to match the level of hype he would bring both among the mainstream audience and the hardcore fanbase due to his sheer iconicness and worldwide popularity. Combined with the fact that he is the character that is currently in the spotlight due to being the "hot" Pokemon and he has nothing going against him.
Overall, I think E3 is where he'll be revealed, mostly because he's simply too hype-worthy on a level beyond every newcomer character possible, including Mega Man, to simply be passed up for a reveal for any good reason. The idea of leaving him out in general is not really something I can see Sakurai doing this time around, so I won't debate about the likelyhood of Mewtwo getting left out from Smash 4. He is not just the A-game to bring to E3, but also one that is sufficient alone for an E3 reveal to hype and draw many, many people around the world to buying Smash 4, something that would be very valuable considering the state of the Wii-U. Heck, with Mewtwo more than sufficiently being able to hype up people, no newcomer would be needed to be shown there and thus can be in as unlockable characters not announced pre-reveal. (given the lack of newcomer unlockable characters in Brawl, this makes sense). Though I still expect Pac-Man to be shown at E3 just because he's a third-party character.
How come?EDIT: Reading that again you're really overestimating Mewtwo's appeal...
I think you might be underestimating Mewtwo's appeal.EDIT: Reading that again you're really overestimating Mewtwo's appeal...
Take this quoteHow come?
That said, he's no Sonic. Then again, can anyone claim to be on the level of Sonic in terms of newcomer/returning veteran hype?
I almost guarantee this would be the reactions to the following. (Not taking into account the dedicated fans)He is not just the A-game to bring to E3, but also one that is sufficient alone for an E3 reveal to hype and draw many, many people around the world to buying Smash 4, something that would be very valuable considering the state of the Wii-U. Heck, with Mewtwo more than sufficiently being able to hype up people, no newcomer would be needed to be shown there and thus can be in as unlockable characters not announced pre-reveal. (given the lack of newcomer unlockable characters in Brawl, this makes sense). Though I still expect Pac-Man to be shown at E3 just because he's a third-party character.
Why are you so sure? I mean, Mewtwo is the most requested character, and there is substantial proof to that.Take this quote
I almost guarantee this would be the reactions to the following. (Not taking into account the dedicated fans)
Mewtwo revealed only: "Seriously? Just Mewtwo? Smash really has no one left if Nintendo thinks he'll be enough for E3. Doomed, etc, etc" (Basically it'll give them a bad image.)
Mewtwo revealed with Pac Man: "Cool Pac Man fighting Mario."
Also saying he could actually get "many, many" people in the world to buy Smash 4 is pushing it. He sure wasn't Melee's selling point.
Nailed it real hard since they are the lowest Nintendo fans after all. Besides, Nintendo barely takes Miiverse serious. The day Reggie joins the roster will be the day I quit Smash.They do, but not us.
These are probably the Miiverse people who are signing this petition.
Which specific example are you referring to?All I'll say is this, since I've been noticing it a lot.
You guys know that Smashboards isn't representative of what the whole world gets hyped about, right? The "popular" opinion here doesn't necessarily correlate to the popular opinion over all. So saying one character is or isn't a hypeable character based on here alone is asinine.
@ Opossum basically said what I was about to say specifically in reply to this, but I'll go even further.Why are you so sure? I mean, Mewtwo is the most requested character, and there is substantial proof to that.
Bringing back Mewtwo would appeal to many fans worldwide.
-Mewtwo would appeal to more than just the Pokemon audience. He would appeal to the Smash audience. The people who desperately want Mewtwo in the game.-His audience are not E3's audience. He has a dedicated audience who actually aren't a priority in E3, Pokemon fans. (Emphasis on fans, not everyone who plays Pokemon necessarily cares about Mewtwo. Or in short the "casuals" don't.) The audience at E3 does NOT care for Pokemon, which to these people are nothing but "childish". Pokemon is probably the one video game franchise that is its own bubble. I'll get to this point later with evidence using Nintendo's own conferences, but this is crucial.
-No, he does not have mass appeal. Pikachu is the only Pokemon who does. You don't see Mewtwo advertised as the face of Pokemon, and you don't see him used in promotions often either.
-He is a veteran. He is not new to Smash. If he was the character to show at E3, a lot of people will shrug it off and consider it a failure on Nintendo's part to think that a Pokemon veteran could appeal to them. Journalists will definitely not react favorably to that.
I expect a handful of characters. I'd bet even more then 3.-Mewtwo would appeal to more than just the Pokemon audience. He would appeal to the Smash audience. The people who desperately want Mewtwo in the game.
-Mewtwo may not be as promoted as Pikachu, but he's still used in promotions very often, especially as of late. He's all over the place, now.
-He's a cut veteran. That means that he isn't assumed to return by default. This isn't the kind of thing people will just shrug off.
Also, who's to say we only get one character reveal at E3? Why not have Mewtwo, Pac-Man, and someone else? We got three last time, after all.
-But those people are still dedicated fans, not mainstream. Again, catering to just a specific group is a recipe for failure at E3.-Mewtwo would appeal to more than just the Pokemon audience. He would appeal to the Smash audience. The people who desperately want Mewtwo in the game.
-Mewtwo may not be as promoted as Pikachu, but he's still used in promotions very often, especially as of late. He's all over the place, now.
-He's a cut veteran. That means that he isn't assumed to return by default. This isn't the kind of thing people will just shrug off.
Also, who's to say we only get one character reveal at E3? Why not have Mewtwo, Pac-Man, and someone else? We got three last time, after all.
-Even more casual fans want Mewtwo in. He's not some character that's only popular among a small group, he is the single most requested character in the world. That means something.-But those people are still dedicated fans, not mainstream. Again, catering to just a specific group is a recipe for failure at E3.
-This is an anecdote, but I very rarely see him in advertisements in TV and posters. That Mega Mewtwo vs Mega Lucario poster, Genesect movie and Mega Mewtwo Y reveal trailer aren't really promotions.
-It really is.
Again, I did say Mewtwo is a good character to show at E3, in fact we'll probably get more than 3 character reveals. This is all in response to Mewtwo being the character who could carry E3, which simply is not true.
I've noticed that with many characters brought up here. In fact, while I agree with some of the opinions on this site, the rest of the popular opinion in other areas is far more influential than ours.All I'll say is this, since I've been noticing it a lot.
You guys know that Smashboards isn't representative of what the whole world gets hyped about, right? The "popular" opinion here doesn't necessarily correlate to the popular opinion over all. So saying one character is or isn't a hypeable character based on here alone is asinine.