andimidna
Smash Master
Sadly, his petition has over 51,000 signs...So if Sakurai for whatever reason throws Reggie or himself into SSB4, people will get hyped about that?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sadly, his petition has over 51,000 signs...So if Sakurai for whatever reason throws Reggie or himself into SSB4, people will get hyped about that?
Well, then it's a good thing Sakurai only cares about Japanese fans.Sadly, his petition has over 51,000 signs...
Do we honestly expect that they would add a real person into the game just because of his status as a meme among fans?Sadly, his petition has over 51,000 signs...
The developers included Toon Link, so it wouldn't surprise me.Do we honestly expect that they would add a real person into the game just because of his status as a meme among fans?
They do, but not us.Do we honestly expect that they would add a real person into the game just because of his status as a meme among fans?
I don't see the correlation. I'm confused and slightly uncomfortable.The developers included Toon Link, so it wouldn't surprise me.
Both a really terrible choices.I don't see the correlation. I'm confused and slightly uncomfortable.
Toon Link has Reggie's eyes!I don't see the correlation. I'm confused and slightly uncomfortable.
But 51,000 signatures doesn't equal 51,000 sales...Sadly, his petition has over 51,000 signs...
And Nintendo takes petitions very seriously. Look at all those EarthBound re-releases and sequels. And how about that operation Rainfall!They do, but not us.
These are probably the Miiverse people who are signing this petition.
Operation Rainfall actually worked out though.And Nintendo takes petitions very seriously. Look at all those EarthBound re-releases and sequels. And how about that operation Rainfall!
Operation Rainfall and Earthbound are worth making petitions about, not playable Reggie.And Nintendo takes petitions very seriously. Look at all those EarthBound re-releases and sequels. And how about that operation Rainfall!
I've yet to be convinced that Toon Link was ever a terrible choice. I quite liked his inclusion in Brawl, and saw merit. With the merit remaining, I was quite pleased to see him return.Both a really terrible choices.
Not that hard to understand.
Why yes, we are talking about Reggie.Are you...talking about Reggie?
Yes, but is the Reggie Fils-A-Mech the R.O.B. of the future?Operation Rainfall and Earthbound are worth making petitions about, not playable Reggie.
That is more of a "lol, lets try to get them to do this", instead of "I hope they seriously do this".
I kind of agree with Reggie being used in Mii form.The only way I can see Reggie being in is if the Mii is based off of his Mii (which may make me not hate the idea of the Mii as much)
I was replying to a post saying nobody wanted him. Of course I don't expect him.Do we honestly expect that they would add a real person into the game just because of his status as a meme among fans?
DO YOU SEE WHAT YOU'VE CAUSED!?I was replying to a post saying nobody wanted him. Of course I don't expect him.
No, I don't agree that Reggie Fils-A-Mech the R.O.B. of the future. It would be funny to see him mentioned in the game as a trophy or such, but otherwise, not to me.Yes, but is the Reggie Fils-A-Mech the R.O.B. of the future?
Honestly I didn't really enjoy the commercial with that till I got the spot pass mii. Due to this
I kind of agree with Reggie being used in Mii form.
The R.O.B. of the future, defeated by a glass of water.Yes, but is the Reggie Fils-A-Mech the R.O.B. of the future?.
I'd love to see Black Shadow too, but I won't feel comfortable until Cap himself is actually full on confirmed.I'm right there with you Shadow all the way.
Thanks to Xseed. My point is that I don't feel like Nintendo takes petitions as seriously as fans do. Even the important ones.Operation Rainfall actually worked out though.
An opportunity to quote 2 posts!Thanks to Xseed. My point is that I don't feel like Nintendo takes petitions as seriously as fans do. Even the important ones.Operation Rainfall actually worked out though.
Tbh, I didn't understand this whole post.Ah, to heck with it. I'll probably get slapped, a lot, but I'm bringing up Fire Emblem again. Specifically, I'm going to talk how I think whether or not Marth is still unlockable will affect that game.
First, I'll talk about the scenario where he is a starter. With Marth as a starter this go-around, things look pretty grim for Ike, as he is the starter in Brawl. But, he isn't the only one left in bad shape. Chrom fits in Ike's starter spot nice and snug, so if Marth's the starter, he's left in bad shape, too. Unfortunately, this also would mean that Fire Emblem is probably stuck with only 2 representatives, for the third game in a row. We`re still left wondering who that unlockable is. I honestly think that an Awakening character will get in, so I think it would be the Tactician, who could`ve been either a starter or an unlockable.
That leaves us with the scenario that keeps Marth unlockable. This doesn`t change too much, still leaving wonder for what the remainder of the Fire Emblem representation would look like. However, this does affect what I'd expect from other series. Since Marth was selected over Ike or Chrom to be revealed first (which, to a much lesser extent, hurts them as well), spontaneously, at that, it'd make sense for Ness to come before Lucas. Naturally, so close to release, Lucas is put in danger as he is the one, between the two, that should be revealed to be in the game at all. That's all I can see Marth being an unlockable changing.
Marth seems to be bad news for Ike and Chrom, no matter what, but bad news for Chrom, I think, means good news for Tactician. Kinda sucks, though, since I also support no cuts, and Ike is among my favourites, but it looks like either he or Lucas is gonna go, too. Naturally, I'd prefer him be a starter. Using this analysis, what about you guys?
Or, do you think there is something I missed or am wrong about with either of these? Feel free to let me know.
If you're suggesting that being revealed makes Marth a starter, that's pretty silly.Apparently Marth being revealed already never happened.
Sadly, I'm not sure where you could've gotten lost. I thought I was pretty clear, or maybe that's just because I'm the one hat wrote it.Tbh, I didn't understand this whole post.
wat wer u sayin?
So basically you're breaking tradition in the vein attempt to be correct.If you're suggesting that being revealed makes Marth a starter, that's pretty silly.
I'm sorry, what tradition are we talking about here? Marth being an unlockable? We speculators decided on that "tradition", not Sakurai.So basically you're breaking tradition in the vein attempt to be correct.
The character has already been revealed and your expecting him to be hidden away for absolutely no reason whatsoever?I'm sorry, what tradition are we talking about here? Marth being an unlockable? We speculators decided on that "tradition", not Sakurai.
We potentially could, but I don't understand why Marth would be one of the two.Why should we not expect 2 starters from Fire Emblem?
Ike and Chrom are the recent Lords, even though technically Ike appears in his Ranger class. Tactcician is more mysterious, and wouldn't just be the staple that everyone expects to replace Ike.And why do certain things apply to Ike and Chrom but not the Tactician?
Wait, I'm confused. Are you judging me for breaking a tradition that you're assuming is already broken? That just doesn't add up. Not only that, but I never enforced any tradition. Heck, it should be obvious that I still think Marth could be one or the other, and YOU'RE the one talking about tradition, while assuming it's already broken to prove YOUR point!The character has already been revealed and your expecting him to be hidden away for absolutely no reason whatsoever?
Also I find it ironic how you're talking about tradition when you're purposely breaking it to make a point that frankly makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
That trade-off doesn't make sense to me, at all. It's possible, but I don't think it's remotely likely.Now, Marth being a starter probably doesn't mean anything. Why can't Ike be unlockable this time?
Eh, I find it the smartest way to do things, we all already know Marth's returning. No need to have him unlockable with a newcomer playable from the start.That trade-off doesn't make sense to me, at all. It's possible, but I don't think it's remotely likely.
*slaps*Ah, to heck with it. I'll probably get slapped, a lot, but I'm bringing up Fire Emblem again. Specifically, I'm going to talk how I think whether or not Marth is still unlockable will affect that game.
First, I'll talk about the scenario where he is a starter. With Marth as a starter this go-around, things look pretty grim for Ike, as he is the starter in Brawl. But, he isn't the only one left in bad shape. Chrom fits in Ike's starter spot nice and snug, so if Marth's the starter, he's left in bad shape, too. Unfortunately, this also would mean that Fire Emblem is probably stuck with only 2 representatives, for the third game in a row. We`re still left wondering who that unlockable is. I honestly think that an Awakening character will get in, so I think it would be the Tactician, who could`ve been either a starter or an unlockable.
That leaves us with the scenario that keeps Marth unlockable. This doesn`t change too much, still leaving wonder for what the remainder of the Fire Emblem representation would look like. However, this does affect what I'd expect from other series. Since Marth was selected over Ike or Chrom to be revealed first (which, to a much lesser extent, hurts them as well), spontaneously, at that, it'd make sense for Ness to come before Lucas. Naturally, so close to release, Lucas is put in danger as he is the one, between the two, that should be revealed to be in the game at all. That's all I can see Marth being an unlockable changing.
Marth seems to be bad news for Ike and Chrom, no matter what, but bad news for Chrom, I think, means good news for Tactician. Kinda sucks, though, since I also support no cuts, and Ike is among my favourites, but it looks like either he or Lucas is gonna go, too. Naturally, I'd prefer him be a starter. Using this analysis, what about you guys?
Or, do you think there is something I missed or am wrong about with either of these? Feel free to let me know.
I actually really like that idea, for some reason. Probably because I really like the feeling of finding and earning hidden characters.Start with the Original Eight Starters (Mario, Pikachu, Samus, Link, DK, Fox, Yoshi, and Kirby) and everyone else has to be unlocked.
Solved.
No reason to hide the hype-generating newcomer, either.Eh, I find it the smartest way to do things, we all already know Marth's returning. No need to have him unlockable with a newcomer playable from the start.
Yeah, it's hard for me to have to choose. I'd ultimately rather the Tactician, though.*slaps*
Yeah it'd be a shame if Ike got cut. I really enjoy his playstyle. However, I would not be opposed to Robin/Tactician.