- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 38,832
- Location
- Um....Lost?
- NNID
- Swampasaur
- 3DS FC
- 4141-2776-0914
- Switch FC
- SW-6476-1588-8392
Don't be a jerk.That's a nice spam ya got there.
It would be a shame if someone were to report it.
Really.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Don't be a jerk.That's a nice spam ya got there.
It would be a shame if someone were to report it.
Actually cut threads aren't allowed.So I was thinking of cut characters, and I came across a locked thread made by @SMX.
It was about what characters would be locked, and it was locked due to it being absolutely pointless.
Yes I think I was the only one who realized that .Somewhat. I just need people to know that the list I posted isn't characters I want to get cut but rather characters that may get cut from SSB4. If they all end up returning, that would be just fine.
No harm done dude can't be any worse then people suggesting Meta Knight to be cutSomewhat. I just need people to know that the list I posted isn't characters I want to get cut but rather characters that may get cut from SSB4. If they all end up returning, that would be just fine.
AmenActually cut threads aren't allowed.
What?Don't be a jerk.
Really.
He is new. Try just telling him he shouldn't do that instead of making a joke about it.What?
He posted the name of a character that wasn't even relevant to the discussion.
TWICE!
If he wanted to propose the discussion of Duck Hunt Dog, he should have said, "So what does everyone think of a Duck Hunt Dog?"
That would still be irrelevant, but at least it would sound less like spam, and not just saying the name twice.
Going by all of times I've receive warnings for spam, this the definition of the term.
When Melee was being released, I thought he might have been included.You know, guys, something I've noticed. A lot of people are requesting Banjo-Kazooie for SSB4.
Has anyone ever noticed that if Nintendo still owned Rare Banjo-Kazooie would've most certainly made it by now?
He would've been in 64 probably, then in Melee comes Gruntilda and in Brawl we get Mumbo.You know, guys, something I've noticed. A lot of people are requesting Banjo-Kazooie for SSB4.
Has anyone ever noticed that if Nintendo still owned Rare Banjo-Kazooie would've most certainly made it by now?
I made a moveset for BK awhile back out of boredom. Where might one post movesets and etc. for implausible or impossible characters?You know, guys, something I've noticed. A lot of people are requesting Banjo-Kazooie for SSB4.
Has anyone ever noticed that if Nintendo still owned Rare Banjo-Kazooie would've most certainly made it by now?
Banjo and Kazooie have their own thread. Technically, they're not impossible. Grunty's Revenge and Banjo-Pilot were released on Nintendo systems years after the franchise was sold to Microsoft.I made a moveset for BK awhile back out of boredom. Where might one post movesets and etc. for implausible or impossible characters?
Banjo should have been in the first game. He most certainly would have made it into Melee if Rare wasn't sold off.You know, guys, something I've noticed. A lot of people are requesting Banjo-Kazooie for SSB4.
Has anyone ever noticed that if Nintendo still owned Rare Banjo-Kazooie would've most certainly made it by now?
It's a really sad thought. I will never understand why they sold them off...Banjo should have been in the first game. He most certainly would have made it into Melee if Rare wasn't sold off.
Hell, we'd probably have Mumbo and Grunty by now too.
Rare:If Rare wasn't sold, we would have plenty of Rare reps, including Conker, many from the Banjo Kazooie franchise, and even series that would have been created if they weren't bought off.
Banjo, Mumbo, Grunty, Conker, Juno, Vela, Lupus, one of the Battle Toads, Kameo (originally planned to be a GameCube title), hell throw in Sabrewulf.And think of the music that would have come from having Banjo in Brawl!
Actually, if RARE was still owned by Nintendo, I would have advocated for Conker the Squirrel too. Eh? Anybody?
Yeah, that's kinda obvious, so cheering there unique Moveset potential.You know, guys, something I've noticed. A lot of people are requesting Banjo-Kazooie for SSB4.
Has anyone ever noticed that if Nintendo still owned Rare Banjo-Kazooie would've most certainly made it by now?
Battle Toads for Melee.Banjo, Mumbo, Grunty, Conker, Juno, Vela, Lupus, one of the Battle Toads, Kameo (originally planned to be a GameCube title), hell throw in Sabrewulf.
Why has there not been some giant mass of fans throwing everything they've got into getting Nintendo to buy back all these IPs, if not Rare themselves?
Such a depressing thought.
It really sucks, huh? Stupid M$.It's a really sad thought. I will never understand why they sold them off...
His chances are ziltch now.
Nah, it's good.Sorry. My apologies.
[citation needed]I disagree. Little Mac most likely would not have gotten into Smash had Punch-Out not already been a classic franchise.
And you believe that? If it sold, they'd make a new game. Innovation hasn't prevented NSMB after NSMB. It comes down to sales, Nintendo is a business.All in F-Zero's favor. It is a classic and popular series. Nintendo also clearly cares about how much of an impact F-Zero has because they constantly reference it. The only reason they haven't made a new game is because they can't think of anything innovative.
And F-Zero double that. That wasn't my point though, my point was that classic means nothing for non-retro series. You're welcome to show me proof that states otherwise. Not your suspicions.Like I said, Punch-Out has been absent for 5 years.
You'll have to elaborate, I still don't understand.Well...
clas·sic
ˈklasik/
adjective
adjective: classic
noun
- 1.
judged over a period of time to be of the highest quality and outstanding of its kind.
"a classic novel"
synonyms:definitive, authoritative;More
outstanding, first-rate, first-class, best, finest, excellent, superior, masterly
"the classic work on the subject"
- (of a garment or design) of a simple elegant style not greatly subject to changes in fashion.
"this classic navy blazer"
synonyms:simple, elegant, understated;More
traditional, timeless, ageless
"a classic style"- remarkably and instructively typical.
"Hamlet is the classic example of a tragedy"
synonyms:typical, archetypal, quintessential, vintage;More
model, representative, perfect, prime, textbook
"a classic example of Norman design"
antonyms:atypical
noun: classic; plural noun: classics; plural noun: Classics; noun: Classic
1.
a work of art of recognized and established value.
"his books have become classics"
synonyms:definitive example, model, epitome, paradigm, exemplar;More
If you want a true measure of popularity, look at the reception of F-Zero games commercially, not people on the internet demanding it, they make up a minuscule percentage of things.I'm stating reasons why F-Zero is popular.
If being classic makes something a major Nintendo series, then Balloon Fight, StarTropics, and any number of one-shot retro games are also major Nintendo series.I'm sorry, but those are both lies.
Considering they are made up of major characters from larger series or protagonists, yes. It's not the only thing that matters, but popularity matters.And you think that will ultimately define priority?
[citation needed]I'm pretty sure Sakurai said he was based on being a racer.
Well one has a sword, and the other doesn't. Swords are used for fighting. Ergo, if one fights with a sword, and one doesn't, those are different fighting styles.And you base this on......
But Pikachu and Pichu have a similar fighting style. I never said you need both. Perhaps don't split my sentences up and you won't lose sight of what's being said.Body structure eh?
I suppose having a bigger horizontal size of your torso ultimately makes you more different than having a bigger vertical size of your torso...along with a bigger head and stubbier arms.
We can sit here and analyze until the cows come home, but I guarantee you that I will find more similarities in their body structures than in Pikachu & Pichu's.
Appearance, role, and body structure? You just gave me an example of a character who doesn't have the same body structure as the original one. TL doesn't share Link's body structure. Wolf doesn't share Fox's role.These are the 2 factors
Factor A: The character shares significant similarities in appearance, role, and body structure. (The key word being "significant" and not "exact"}
If Sakurai was so desperate he could've included Goroh who meets Factor A (according to you) instead, yes?Factor B: The character is originally capable of performing a significant amount of abilities as the same character so long as they satisfy Factor A. (The only known exception to this is Ganondorf. An exception made at a time of desperate clone phone ins.)
I know. But not only does Goroh not share Captain Falcon's body structure, he doesn't share his fighting style either. Pichu shares Pikachu's.You do not need the exact same body structure. You need similar body structure. Samurai Goroh is roughly similar to Captain Falcon's body structure. The exception being that he is wider. But, again Pichu is wider AND shorter.
Characters can share moves and not be clones.When I said Sakurai thinks a character should be a clone, it is under the rational assumption that said character is similar. Sakurai does state the criteria that Toon Link MUST share moves with Adult Link.
Sakurai's first instinct is to pass on characters similar to another, so obviously he thought no characters should be clones. He thought they should be excluded, and only reconsidered when he decided to pad the roster.The relevance?
Goroh fights IN SMASH BROS and it's different from how Captain Falcon fights.Nothing in common with the fighting style? As far as I know neither characters have ever fought outside of Super Smash Brothers so Samurai Goroh's fighting style would logically be the same as Captain Falcon if he was a character.
Yes it was. Wolf was actually too similar, so he went with Falco.Sakurai ultimately decided who the best fit for a Fox clone was. And it wasn't Wolf.
I'm not saying he came across Ganondorf first. I'm saying Ganondorf got in because Sakurai couldn't think of any other feasible clones. The thinking came first. Only after Sakurai couldn't come up with any additional ideas for feasible clones did he implement Ganondorf. If Sakurai could've come up with someone else, going by the statement, that character would've been the one added instead. Therefore, unless you mean to suggest Sakurai forgot about Goroh, since Ganondorf was only added in the absence of any other feasible characters, Goroh obviously wasn't a feasible clone in Sakurai's mind. Ganondorf wasn't chosen because he was a better fit for Captain Falcon. He was chosen because, for Sakurai, he was the only fit for Captain Falcon.I'm still not getting your argument. You're saying that because he came across Ganondorf first and ultimately decided he wanted that character over Goroh that Goroh never crossed his mind? I mean the situation was that Ganondorf got in because of his similar body type. Not that he was the only choice of the many characters who had a similar body type. For all you know it was planned to be Goroh before he decided Ganondorf would work better.
Sakurai mentioned that Ganondorf was "lucky" to get in and that he only got in because he had a similar body style to Captain Falcon and he couldn't think of any more viable clones.
Yes he did, Wolf was considered before Falco.Notice Captain Falcon's name is not before the word "clones". He just couldn't think of any. Wolf was in the opening and he didn't think of him.
you are forgivenSorry. My apologies.
Hmmmm......There are always rumors of Nintendo trying to buy Rare's IPs. Hopefully it one day comes true and an actual Banjo-Threeie is released. Funny how Rare's characters are the perfect fit for Smash and in no way suit Microsoft's style
A Smash-style game featuring Rareware characters would be sweet. Dunno if Killer Instinct characters would be included, since they come from a fighting game themselves, but one or two could be thrown in for good measure.Banjo, Mumbo, Grunty, Conker, Juno, Vela, Lupus, one of the Battle Toads, Kameo (originally planned to be a GameCube title), hell throw in Sabrewulf.
Why has there not been some giant mass of fans throwing everything they've got into getting Nintendo to buy back all these IPs, if not Rare themselves?
Such a depressing thought.
If only...Hell, maybe we can get Banjo now.
"Can Banjo-Kazooie appear in the new Super Smash Bros. 4?
"Sure, why not? It's not like we'll ever use him anyway!"
cheer up man im kinda new here tooIt's always my fault. Every new community I join, sorry bidoof.
nah, sabrewulf wouldn't make it he is a too of a blood thirsty character. banjo joanna mumbo grunty are perfect, but what about james bond?A Smash-style game featuring Rareware characters would be sweet. Dunno if Killer Instinct characters would be included, since they come from a fighting game themselves, but one or two could be thrown in for good measure.
As an aside, the Jet Force Gemini OST is probably my favourite N64 soundtrack (and for most games ever). And JFG is one of my favourite titles ever too, evidently.
The reason I picked Sabrewulf is because he did not originate in Killer Instinct, the KI character is based off of one of Rare's old, old games Sabre Wulf. So technically, he would be eligible, even if in his KI form.A Smash-style game featuring Rareware characters would be sweet. Dunno if Killer Instinct characters would be included, since they come from a fighting game themselves, but one or two could be thrown in for good measure.
As an aside, the Jet Force Gemini OST is probably my favourite N64 soundtrack (and for most games ever). And JFG is one of my favourite titles ever too, evidently.