TitanTeaTime
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2014
- Messages
- 1,964
- Location
- wherever I feel like
- NNID
- TitanTeaTime
- 3DS FC
- 2165-6601-4781
Somebody please tell me the companies listed there are all 2nd party... I really don't want my hope for Shulk to die
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Mother characters deconfirmed then, since Itoi/Ape isn't creditied.Outside of the copyrights, Snake NOT being there in the pic with the other guest characters is alone a strong hint towards him not being playable, in my eyes at least. Sigh.
I said outside of the copyrights, if that image is legit, the shot with Sonic, Mega Man and Pac-Man being "guest characters", and not having Snake alongside them, is a bit shady. I'd assume Snake would be shown pre-release and placed alongside them but nah, what do I know. I certainly hope Snake is in but day after day I feel like I'm losing hope on him haha.Mother characters deconfirmed then, since Itoi/Ape isn't creditied.
Kirby has already the 3 most important characters in the entire series, so there is no need for more becuase they represent Kirby very well, also Sakurai said that he didn't want to overrepresent Kirby by filling the roster with Kirby characters.And for Kirby to have 3
Ness is usually kept secret though, so it's no surprise Itoi and Ape aren't credited. Lucas on the other hand...Mother characters deconfirmed then, since Itoi/Ape isn't creditied.
This. Kirby, Meta Knight, and King Dedede are the core three characters of the franchise. There is no need for a 4th, and the fact that Bandana Dee was playable in Return to Dreamland isn't enough to make me change my mind.Kirby has already the 3 most important characters in the entire series, so there is no need for more becuase they represent Kirby very well, also Sakurai said that he didn't want to overrepresent Kirby by filling the roster with Kirby characters.
From my understanding, only companies that have content on the actual box art are credited in the box art. I guess the game and the box art are basically separate products.Somebody please tell me the companies listed there are all 2nd party... I really don't want my hope for Shulk to die
Monolith Soft is First Party, so Shulk is safe. And even then, the worst-case scenario for Shulk appears to be Secret character status.Somebody please tell me the companies listed there are all 2nd party... I really don't want my hope for Shulk to die
Jigglypuff isn't going anywhere. She is part of the almighty Twelve Originals and I read somewhere she's Sakurai's favorite Pokémon. So Jiggs stays for sure,,,, . : All LIKELY to return, for various reasons, but without anything seen in the games that can exclusively be tied to them.
But he fills Smash Run with a crap ton of Uprising content.Kirby has already the 3 most important characters in the entire series, so there is no need for more becuase they represent Kirby very well, also Sakurai said that he didn't want to overrepresent Kirby by filling the roster with Kirby characters.
Uprising has probably the best array of enemy designs I've seen in a Nintendo game lately. Just saying.But he fills Smash Run with a crap ton of Uprising content.
Subjective opinion, but Zelda, Donkey Kong, Pokémon, Kirby, and Metroid all have a wide variety of enemies to pick from. And they are growing franchises and have a much bigger impact on Nintendo rather than one game on the 3DS. Just saying.Uprising has probably the best array of enemy designs I've seen in a Nintendo game lately. Just saying.
Well, of course it's subjective. The thing is, as long as the enemies are varied in design and attack patterns, I don't really care where they come from.Subjective opinion, but Zelda, Donkey Kong, Pokémon, Kirby, and Metroid all have a wide variety of enemies to pick from. And they are growing franchises and have a much bigger impact on Nintendo rather than one game on the 3DS. Just saying.
But who knows, maybe we'll see more of those enemies.
The only companies credited in the boxart are those whose character appear in the boxart. We have a Rayman trophy and Ubisoft isn't credited either.So as you have all probably discussed already, Snake is pretty much deconfirmed, due to Konami not being credited on the Japanese boxart.
I think he still has a chance as DLC.
His trailer could have him communicating with the colonel, informing him that he has infiltrated enemy lines, through new "DLC" technology.
All the involved 3rd parties will have to be credited in the game's credits though.The only companies credited in the boxart are those whose character appear in the boxart. We have a Rayman trophy and Ubisoft isn't credited either.
Well, he was pretty unique, and it's a shame to lose a unique moveset. That said, I have to agree that he doesn't really fit much with the other characters.I'm glad Snake (probably) isn't returning, He just doesn't fit in with the other characters to me, and I don't like his moveset enough for me to want him back for that either.
Rayman is a character, he's only referenced as a trophy.Anyone who brings up the "Rayman is a trophy, so Ubisoft copyright or GTFO" argument:
READ the copyrights.
It says characters. Rayman is a trophy, not a character.
No, it shouldn't.Rayman is a character, he's only referenced as a trophy.
it should still count.
If you look at the official site, the only credits given are at the very bottom. If they were going to be putting every single company they had to credit, it'd be a daaaaaaamn long list to put on that.Rayman is a character, he's only referenced as a trophy.
it should still count.
hm, good point.No, it shouldn't.
Or where's Camelot, NOISE, Treasure, TOSE, etc. for their Assist Trophies in Brawl (those are "characters" too, right?), Skip Ltd. for Chibi-Robo's trophy, etc.?
http://i.imgur.com/iU571fE.jpghm, good point.
I just got here and had no idea what we were talking about, I just objected to something that didn't make sense to me.
so what exactly is this about?
Oh, I see. now that makes a lot more sense.http://i.imgur.com/iU571fE.jpg
This, and what it potentially means for characters such as Snake, Lucas, etc.
Though, how many characters are even on the box art? Previous starter characters like Zelda, Meta Knight, King Dedede, and Wario are, as of now, nowhere to be seen on the box art. I doubt that they would have every starting character appear somewhere on the box art, so I wouldn't say this is terrible news for characters like Lucas.While it's true that the company trademarks are for characters on the box, as I said in the Social thread, it makes me doubtful of Lucas and Snake.
-Previous games' boxes typically showed the entire starting roster. Unless both Lucas and Ness are unlockable this time around, I think the fact that Ape Inc./Shigisato Itoi are unlisted is damning for Lucas (not Ness, since he has the excuse of "he's probably unlockable again").
But that's what made him good, not fitting in with the rest of the cast, using actual military guns, using german suplexes, etc... it was so serious that it ended up being kinda ridiculous, just like MGS itself.My problem with Snake isn't that he doesn't match or fit in. I have absolutely no attachment towards him or his moveset. His tilts were OP as heck too. But that could always be fixed.
That may be true, but at the same time, we haven't seen the entire back. Which I hypothesize to be deliberate due to the fact there are characters yet to be revealed (such as Wario) higher up.Though, how many characters are even on the box art? Previous starter characters like Zelda, Meta Knight, King Dedede, and Wario are, as of now, nowhere to be seen on the box art. I doubt that they would have every starting character appear somewhere on the box art, so I wouldn't say this is terrible news for characters like Lucas.
Mr. Saturn is an item. And for all we know, doesn't show up on the box.I don't think this actually means anything for snake or anything cause Shigesato Itoi and Ape inc. are also not credited, even though we have seen mr. saturn already.
Yes, there may be more characters on the back we haven't seen yet. But I find it a little hard to believe that they would (or could) really cram the entire starting roster in what little space they have left on the back. I think you're right about there being more characters on the back, possibly including one or two unrevealed ones, but based on what we currently know about the box, I don't think we can use it as solid evidence against the return of characters like Lucas.That may be true, but at the same time, we haven't seen the entire back. Which I hypothesize to be deliberate due to the fact there are characters yet to be revealed (such as Wario) higher up.
The copyright thing isn't what hurts Snake, it's the 3rd party lineup being shown with no sign of Snake. If Snake isn't going to be shown pre-release to promote the game, which this suggests, there's a very high chance he isn't in the game.I don't think this actually means anything for snake or anything cause Shigesato Itoi and Ape inc. are also not credited, even though we have seen mr. saturn already.
If we go with the Brawl pattern then the characters that are revealed earlier are going to be the ones that are used primarily for promotion. Of course there's Captain Falcon here so it probably doesn't work like that, but I still don't think they'd include characters that are announced close to release on the box art if only for the fact that they could leak early.Though, how many characters are even on the box art? Previous starter characters like Zelda, Meta Knight, King Dedede, and Wario are, as of now, nowhere to be seen on the box art. I doubt that they would have every starting character appear somewhere on the box art, so I wouldn't say this is terrible news for characters like Lucas.