mark welford
Smash Ace
@Capt. Butt Stallion your avatar reminds me of my 10th grade vice principle or captain falcon being a lawyer all I'm saying is nice goatee you got there
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I called it asinine because there's absolutely nothing to support it. If that's not what you meant by your quote, you should probably explain it a little bit more thoroughly, because then that means I misunderstood.You distort my entire quotation to read that I think the interview is a conspiracy, and then call my theory asinine?
Bold words from a moderator.
My point is that we are not going to get a negative statement from them in regard to including Snake, so using their words as a point for snake is absolutely incredulous. We would not hear, after Snake was included in Brawl, that they feel e did not fit, or that he is not Nintendo enough.
Was my last post more clear in my view?I called it asinine because there's absolutely nothing to support it. If that's not what you meant by your quote, you should probably explain it a little bit more thoroughly, because then that means I misunderstood.
Also, it might be"bold" for a moderator, but I'm still here to speculate. When I think I see a "theory" that I think has no foundation, I'm going to call it out. I'm not going to ignore stuff like that just because I'm a mod. It's not like I can't do that.
Frankly, if Iwata, in his deepest heart of hearts, did not think that Snake fit, then why would he go into such detail to cover how they came to the conclusion that he should be in in that interview? On top of that, if he was negative toward the inclusion, why allow it to happen in the first place?
I already addressed the fact that we wouldn't get a negative quote from any of them because that's typically how PR works. However, that doesn't mean they actually feel negatively toward Snake's inclusion in Brawl. There is nothing to suggest that except for Kojima's words on the initial debate on if Snake were "too Sony". That was basically hinted to by Iwata in the interview with Sakurai in which he talks about "where to draw the line" with 3rd Party characters.Was my last post more clear in my view?
*Best Snake Gif, Warning*
Yeah but you had to kill 20 guys in cruel brawl then shoot all the names.Apparently Master Chief was in Brawl.
Huh.
The seventh hat is Skull Kid. Comparison:Moving on; I posted this in the K.Rool thread, but does anyone know who this hat is (third on the right, bottom?)
Loving some of these hats, except the hunter-kill Banjo :D
I love the Kirby Hats!
If you want "not Nintendo enough", then here's Nintendo's only competition from 1991-1995, as well as a primary competitor from 1991-2001.We would not hear, after Snake was included in Brawl, that they feel e did not fit, or that he is not Nintendo enough.
Miahstorm was debunked before; but it was the best leak, who would want it fixed?Seriously, why isn't anyone as excited as I was that Meta Knight had just been confirmed today, the Miahstorm leak comptely debunked, and one of my two remaining mains from Brawl (the other being Falco) is now in? Which reminds me....
META KNIGHT!!! META KNIGHT!!! FIGHTING TO SAVE THE WORLD!!!
Sorry. Had to reference the Invitational there.
My opening thesis in addressing that interview is that it points to nothing in regard to Snake coming back or not- my views are not negative in fashion with it, but that it certainly highlights nothing specifically positive.I already addressed the fact that we wouldn't get a negative quote from any of them because that's typically how PR works. However, that doesn't mean they actually feel negatively toward Snake's inclusion in Brawl. There is nothing to suggest that except for Kojima's words on the initial debate on if Snake were "too Sony". That was basically hinted to by Iwata in the interview with Sakurai in which he talks about "where to draw the line" with 3rd Party characters.
I guess my point is that there's no reason to think that were completely against Snake in the game, because if they were, he wouldn't have been in Brawl in the first place. Iwata basically still gets veto power.
Let me put this simply:the Miahstorm leak comptely debunked
Well the way I see it, that article/interview is a powerhouse detriment to most arguments against him. "Snake isn't Nintendo enough!" and "Snake doesn't fit!" aren't really applicable to his chances because of that. Whether you believe what they say or not is up to you, but I see no reason for them to lie about it if the original option would have been to not have him in the game in the first place.Miahstorm was debunked before; but it was the best leak, who would want it fixed?
My opening thesis in addressing that interview is that it points to nothing in regard to Snake coming back or not- my views are not negative in fashion with it, but that it certainly highlights nothing specifically positive.
N3ON, stop with the lies.Yeah but you had to kill 20 guys in cruel brawl then shoot all the names.
You think they would have said he doesn't fit in and he isnt Nintendo enough?Well the way I see it, that article/interview is a powerhouse detriment to most arguments against him. "Snake isn't Nintendo enough!" and "Snake doesn't fit!" aren't really applicable to his chances because of that. Whether you believe what they say or not is up to you, but I see no reason for them to lie about it if the original option would have been to not have him in the game in the first place.
Those were essentially the biggest (and worst) arguments against him in the first place. But this basically seals the deal.
The Mii Fighters are (obviously) supposed to be a representation of the Mii, which has been around since the Wii's release. They obviously couldn't just put Miis in the game, because what the hell would they do? So, if we're counting appearances, the Mii has made three: Nintendo Wii, 3DS, and Wii U.-The Mii Fighters (literally 0)
And the only starters that have yet to be revealed from all games are those 3 plus Ness. I think Ness/Lucas and Wario could potentially be in someone else's trailer, with the Ice Climbers being revealed early September maybe?So far the only Brawl starters not confirmed yet are Ice Climbers, Lucas, and Wario.
For those that don't know miahstorm leak well, how did it get debunked today?Seriously, why isn't anyone as excited as I was that Meta Knight had just been confirmed today, the Miahstorm leak comptely debunked, and one of my two remaining mains from Brawl (the other being Falco) is now in? Which reminds me....
META KNIGHT!!! META KNIGHT!!! FIGHTING TO SAVE THE WORLD!!!
Sorry. Had to reference the Invitational there.
Yeah, but the actual Mii Fighters are making their video game debut on Smash 4 the same way Roy made his video game debut in Melee.The Mii Fighters are (obviously) supposed to be a representation of the Mii, which has been around since the Wii's release. They obviously couldn't just put Miis in the game, because what the hell would they do? So, if we're counting appearances, the Mii has made three: Nintendo Wii, 3DS, and Wii U.
It said Meta Knight was to be revealed in Waddle Dee's trailer or something like that.For those that don't know miahstorm leak well, how did it get debunked today?
He said Meta Knight was going to be revealed at Comic Con along with Bandanna Dee.For those that don't know miahstorm leak well, how did it get debunked today?
Alright, I can agree with that logic.Yeah, but the actual Mii Fighters are making their video game debut on Smash 4 the same way Roy made his video game debut in Melee.
I get that they're Miis, but they're a brand new kind of Miis specific for Smash.
That is why they have the Smash logo as their logo.
They are seen as a new version of a older creation.
Regardless, it's semantics, haha.
Oh dear god that K.Rool oneNope, that is not what I think. Hyperbole is taking the base of someone's argument and exaggerating it to highlight the flaw in logic. That is what was being done above.
As for an impossible option, I wouldn't count anyone as impossible, just highly improbable.
___________________________
Moving on; I posted this in the K.Rool thread, but does anyone know who this hat is (third on the right, bottom?)
Loving some of these hats, except the hunter-kill Banjo :D
Krystal, Isaac, K Rool, Ridley,
Dixie, Banjo, _____. Bowser Junior
I love the Kirby Hats!
Yet The Gematsu leak was not 'Debunked' when Pacman, Mii, and Little Mac were not revealed back in 2013?He said Meta Knight was going to be revealed at Comic Con along with Bandanna Dee.
Yet The Gematsu leak was not 'Debunked' when Pacman, Mii, and Little Mac were not revealed back in 2013?
Cmon guys, Gematsu even called them 'predictions' then.
OH no... no non no..
I don't like where this is going.
Quick!
Dark Pit! Clones suck!
Original 12 means nothing, Jigglypuff is out!
Ridley is too big! Bosses---
Anything else... please....
Well, the eye is his most noticable feature.Yeah, the eye is a little grotesque. He would be fine with just the crown and/or the cape.
Love the K Rool one. The banjo one should have definitely included the blue backpack. Skull kid one is pretty good too.Nope, that is not what I think. Hyperbole is taking the base of someone's argument and exaggerating it to highlight the flaw in logic. That is what was being done above.
As for an impossible option, I wouldn't count anyone as impossible, just highly improbable.
___________________________
Moving on; I posted this in the K.Rool thread, but does anyone know who this hat is (third on the right, bottom?)
Loving some of these hats, except the hunter-kill Banjo :D
Krystal, Isaac, K Rool, Ridley,
Dixie, Banjo, Skull Kid, Bowser Junior
I love the Kirby Hats!
No. My point is that they wouldn't have added him in the first place if they felt that way. Of course they wouldn't outright say otherwise.You think they would have said he doesn't fit in and he isnt Nintendo enough?
They were asked about it directly, of course they aren't going to say that! It isn't in the culture and it is bad marketing.
That is my point- that whether or not they do feel that way, it never would have been revealed. The interview in that regard proves absolutely nothing to me. It's not about lying, it is about disrespect. At a Japanese dinner, you never say you do not like something. If asked, you say it is good, or very good. Snake fits, just fine, or in other words, he is the dinner that is just good.
I could do without. K. Rool's eye simply doesn't suit poor Kirby very well at all, imo. When's the last time he had a hat transformation that frightening? He doesn't even look happy to have K. Rool's powers.Well, the eye is his most noticable feature.
Say what you want about JK, but I actually hope this is true. I'm sorry guys, but I just love Lucas too much.Let me put this simply:
All the leaks out there except almost definitely the last 2 character remnants of what is left of the 2nd Sal leak are all fake and are all de facto debunked.
Boom! Open field to play in guys!
Wait, is he saying Lucas has a good shot?Say what you want about JK, but I actually hope this is true. I'm sorry guys, but I just love Lucas too much.
He says that all of the "high-risk" veterans have a better shot than people are assuming.Wait, is he saying Lucas has a good shot?
Sakurai did say he wanted to bring everyone from Brawl back. And Mewtwo was kicked out thanks to SSE which is gone now. But hearing this makes me giddy for Lucas possibly being back.He says that all of the "high-risk" veterans have a better shot than people are assuming.
No, I'm saying that aside from Shulk and The Chorus Men/Marshall that everything else in the Sal leak could go either way.Wait, is he saying Lucas has a good shot?
With that said, don't be shocked if Squirtle or Ivysaur comes back (even if they've evolved into and now).He says that all of the "high-risk" veterans have a better shot than people are assuming.
No, I'm saying that aside from Shulk and The Chorus Men/Marshall that everything else in the Sal leak could go either way.
It's based on information that is 2 years outdated.
And the one thing that isn't is the trailer stuff, which is based on Sal's source, who has a source that is out of the know with trailer releases (clearly since day 1 that should have been the case).
But yeah, based on Lucina being added late, I don't see why any character in Brawl couldn't have a similar fate, seeing as how all the 39 characters in Brawl were fantastic additions.
tl;dr, in words better than what I can say, what I am saying is this...
With that said, don't be shocked if Squirtle or Ivysaur comes back (even if they've evolved into and now).