• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Character Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
Well, you don't have the Ice Climbers. Or Wolf. But more importantly the Ice Climbers.

That'd be a good place to start.
I would most certainly argue that Wolf is more likely given the notion that there are no technical problems regarding his character. But I suppose we need to get Pigma, Panther, and Leon in Smash Run before I can convince people of that.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
This isn't a thread for forum games, folks.

Make constructive posts about the roster and character selection. There are many places where you can play roster games, but this isn't one of them.

Just putting Hong's quote here because I did not see it either and we are on a new page.

Hong has posted several times to stop doing that game.



Dark Pit and Daisy both will probably be alts this time. Daisy has had a subtle alt in past games, but they might as well go the whole way this time around.
Alternate characters, perhaps!

Im sorry to hear about the prince an all that, but in all honesty, Dark Pit, Dr Mario, and "just maybe" Duck Hunt Dog will have to go to make room for Paper Mario, Krystal, Lucas, and Wolf.
Dear god that sounds repugnant.

@ BluePikmin11 BluePikmin11

If I may ask, why do you believe in the Ninka leak?
Because Dark Pit (and the source is credible).
 
Last edited:

ElPanandero

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
1,100
NNID
ElPanandero
The more I play Pm/Vb with textrue hacks, the more I hope for alts. I can only have fun playing as Pit now if I have one of his alts
 

BluePikmin11

Akko is my dear daughter!
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
28,373
Location
https://twitter.com/BPikmin11
NNID
blue
@ BluePikmin11 BluePikmin11

If I may ask, why do you believe in the Ninka leak?
I believe it because he managed to leak two alternate pallete swaps (which are relatively obscure colors by the way) that ended up being in the demo of this year's E3. You can check out the Ninka leak thread for yourself to find out why I believe it if you take a deep look.
 
Last edited:

Reila

the true enemy of humanity is anime
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
9,240
Location
Alma
Alright this my final roster until Ninka kiwi is confirmed fake:
If I may ask, why do you put Ice Climbers in your roster, but not Wolf, when both are supposedly cut according to Ninka_kiwi's leak?
 

BluePikmin11

Akko is my dear daughter!
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
28,373
Location
https://twitter.com/BPikmin11
NNID
blue
If I may ask, why do you put Ice Climbers in your roster, but not Wolf, when both are supposedly cut according to Ninka_kiwi's leak?
I put them there for good measure in case the Ninka_kiwi leak is fake, and I highly doubt at any Nintendo event that IC will be deconfirmed flat-out, unless they show them off as the first DLC characters for the game (Which probably has a 10% happening at this point.)
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
Alright this my final roster until Ninka kiwi is confirmed fake:
It comes off as a bit odd to me that the Mario franchise gets seven representatives, Pokemon gets six, and Zelda sticks with five. I really don't think that would happen. Just my initial thoughts though.
 

Reila

the true enemy of humanity is anime
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
9,240
Location
Alma
It comes off as a bit odd to me that the Mario franchise gets seven representatives, Pokemon gets six, and Zelda sticks with five. I really don't think that would happen. Just my initial thoughts though.
Mario is Nintendo's flagship franchise. It make total sense for it to have more reps than any other series.
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
Mario is Nintendo's flagship franchise. It make total sense for it to have more reps than any other series.
I realize that. My problem is that two out of the three biggest franchises in Smash get character upgrades, but Zelda doesn't. I think if Mario got seven, they would try to at least get Zelda a sixth.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I'm sadly convinced that Mach Rider will probably not be playable...but hey, if hes an assist trophy, cool beans.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I realize that. My problem is that two out of the three biggest franchises in Smash get character upgrades, but Zelda doesn't. I think if Mario got seven, they would try to at least get Zelda a sixth.
Or the "six-six-six" theory. Mario gets an additional character, Dr. Mario (the character I advocate for). Obviously this is a two character increase, after that Pokemon remains stagnant, albeit with completely new characters: Greninja and Mewtwo over Squirtle and Ivysaur. Whilst Legend of Zelda gets a one character increase. It seems feasible...

Not only that, but it would inadvertently confirm Dark Pit as well. I love that theory!
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
Or the "six-six-six" theory. Mario gets an additional character, Dr. Mario (the character I advocate for). Obviously this is a two character increase, after that Pokemon remains stagnant, albeit with completely new characters: Greninja and Mewtwo over Squirtle and Ivysaur. Whilst Legend of Zelda gets a one character increase. It seems feasible...

Not only that, but it would inadvertently confirm Dark Pit as well. I love that theory!
I've had the exact same thought. Either Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon are going to get six representatives each respectively, or they're all going to stick with five. That's how I think it would go.
 

Weeman

Smash Crusader
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
5,279
Location
México
Or the "six-six-six" theory. Mario gets an additional character, Dr. Mario (the character I advocate for). Obviously this is a two character increase, after that Pokemon remains stagnant, albeit with completely new characters: Greninja and Mewtwo over Squirtle and Ivysaur. Whilst Legend of Zelda gets a one character increase. It seems feasible...

Not only that, but it would inadvertently confirm Dark Pit as well. I love that theory!
Why would it confirm him? for the good Doc? or for Kid Icarus always needing to have half of the number of Pokémon reps? :awesome:
 

ihskeyp

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Georgia
I've had the exact same thought. Either Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon are going to get six representatives each respectively, or they're all going to stick with five. That's how I think it would go.
I don't think the numbers of representatives from a series matters as long as all the characters are good choices.
 

EricTheGamerman

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
3,197
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
I don't think the numbers of representatives from a series matters as long as all the characters are good choices.
I can see where you're coming from, but what do you think the developers might think? They probably want the representation to be fair between the big franchises. Plus I think they realize that if Mario and Pokemon both get six representatives, there aren't going to be many happy Legend of Zelda fans if it sticks with five. Especially when you consider that Zelda didn't really get a newcomer in Brawl, rather a replacement.
 

ElPanandero

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
1,100
NNID
ElPanandero
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
Get him @ Morbi Morbi
 

Weeman

Smash Crusader
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
5,279
Location
México
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
Actually the reason we advocate for him is for the fact that Lucina could mean more clones, due to Sakurai's statement about alternate costumes, and since he was teased at the end of Palutena's reveal, he could be more likely than we thought.
ALSO HE'S FREAKING DARK PIT
 

ihskeyp

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Georgia
I can see where you're coming from, but what do you think the developers might think? They probably want the representation to be fair between the big franchises. Plus I think they realize that if Mario and Pokemon both get six representatives, there aren't going to be many happy Legend of Zelda fans if it sticks with five. Especially when you consider that Zelda didn't really get a newcomer in Brawl, rather a replacement.
Sakurai probably cares more about Smash being a fun interesting game with good characters than what the developers think of his decisions. Really though, Pokemon and Mario both outsell Zelda, so even if Sakurai was basing it off that, it would still make sense to have more Mario/Pokemon reps.
 

Second Power

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
719
3DS FC
0774-5502-4430
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
Some of us like him. Some of us like clones. Some of us like both. I'm the third kind.
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
Sakurai probably cares more about Smash being a fun interesting game with good characters than what the developers think of his decisions. Really though, Pokemon and Mario both outsell Zelda, so even if Sakurai was basing it off that, it would still make sense to have more Mario/Pokemon reps.
I thought this thread agreed not to use the sales argument anymore...
I won't debate this with you if that's what you think. I really don't believe that Mario, Pokemon, and Zelda are going to start out representing each other in terms of character count. That's just me though.
 

ihskeyp

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Georgia
I thought this thread agreed not to use the sales argument anymore...
I won't debate this with you if that's what you think. I really don't believe that Mario, Pokemon, and Zelda are going to start out representing each other in terms of character count. That's just me though.
Oh I hate the sales argument, but you are saying that Pokemon, Mario, and Zelda should be equally represented and I was just wondering why? Metroid isn't represented as much as them, neither is any other series. Why those three? And why would developers be mad if their series has one less character than another series?
Edit: and the reason I brought up sales was I thought you were saying Mario Pokemon and Zelda were equally as popular. My apologies.
 
Last edited:

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
Dark Pit is an interesting character choice as he does not need bring much to the table, that is precisely why he is a great potential clone character. Clone characters use a predetermined move-set in a different way, they offer something unique through their similarities. 'Tis their purpose on the roster, good sir.

However, if you are wondering what he does different to warrant the slot, it mostly pertains through his use of different weapons and his association with other characters. For instance, Golden brought up that there is a direct correlation to Pandora, so he could perhaps use Pandora's claws. I thought that idea was interesting; however, most Dark Pit supporters cite his Dark Pit Staff or the different properties on his Silver Bow. The Three Sacred Treasures are never seen with Dark Pit, albeit, nothing stops him from using them. I enjoy his infinite power of flight that is predominantly associated with him (whereas Pit needs Palutena).

Other than the tease, he has evidence on par with Shulk. Tweets, pictures, and more tweets. Tweeted pictures even! His appearance in the trailer is not relevant, it is the unprecedented cliff-hanger compounded with the ambiguous response and appearance in the official art-work that sells him.

He would be his own character for the same reason that you cited.
 
Last edited:

Gold_Jacobson

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
397
Dream Roster Survey Results

Remember, this was based on people listing their most wanted newcomer from the categories:

Super Mario
Wario
Yoshi
Legend of Zelda
Star Fox
Donkey Kong
Metroid
Pokemon
Fire Emblem
Earthbound
Kid Icarus
Retro
3rd Party
Other Nintendo Series
Returning Veteran

I then compiled repeated answers into a survey and roughly 37 people filled it out. Here are the results:



DREAM ROSTER FOR SMASHBOARDS




As you can see we had a couple of ties. Some were actually last minute. (EDIT* Between the time I went back to screenshot data, Walugi broke the tie against Mona) Ties were in Super Mario, Wario, and 3rd party series.

The winner for "Most Wanted Overall" was:




In the future we can do a better survey. There were a couple problems with this one that I will correct for next time.

Hope you enjoyed it.

Here's the data.

 
Last edited:

ihskeyp

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Georgia
Dream Roster Survey Results

Remember, this was based on people listing their most wanted newcomer from the categories:

Super Mario
Wario
Yoshi
Legend of Zelda
Star Fox
Donkey Kong
Metroid
Pokemon
Fire Emblem
Earthbound
Kid Icarus
Retro
3rd Party
Other Nintendo Series
Returning Veteran

I then compiled repeated answers into a survey and roughly 37 people filled it out. Here are the results:



DREAM ROSTER FOR SMASHBOARDS




As you can see we had a couple of ties. Some were actually last minute. Ties were in Super Mario, Wario, and 3rd party series.

The winner for "Most Wanted Overall" was:




In the future we can do a better survey. There were a couple problems with this one that I will correct for next time.

Hope you enjoyed it.
So happy to see Mona and Anna! Sad that Dixie is missing though :( that would be a great roster, though.
 
Last edited:

EricTheGamerman

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
3,197
Dark Pit is an interesting character choice as he does not need bring much to the table, that is precisely why he is a great potential clone character. Clone characters use a predetermined move-set in a different way, they offer something unique through their similarities. 'Tis their purpose on the roster, good sir.

However, if you are wondering what he does different to warrant the slot, it mostly pertains through his use of different weapons and his association with other characters. For instance, Golden brought up that there is a direct correlation to Pandora, so he could perhaps use Pandora's claws. I thought that idea was interesting; however, most Dark Pit supporters cite his Dark Pit Staff or the different properties on his Silver Bow. The Three Sacred Treasures are never seen with Dark Pit, albeit, nothing stops him from using them. I enjoy his infinite power of flight that is predominantly associated with him (whereas Pit needs Palutena).

Other than the tease, he has evidence on par with Shulk. Tweets, pictures, and more tweets. Tweeted pictures even! His appearance in the trailer is not relevant, it is the unprecedented cliff-hanger compounded with the ambiguous response and appearance in the official art-work that sells him.

He would be his own character for the same reason that you cited.
Sorry if I came off a bit too antagonistic towards the character before, just trying to find out what potential he has honestly. I'll admit I'm not a big fan of clones at all, never have really been, so it's pretty much a guarantee that I'll be at least somewhat bias against them until I finally see how different they are from the core character. So learning how he might be different does make me more willing to accept his character. Also I hadn't known about any of the other teasing towards Dark Pit, so I'd always been really hesitant to consider him as a sure bet as so many others had. Would you mind sending me the way of some of those hints just for me to see?
 

AEMehr

Mii Fighter
Moderator
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
7,703
Location
SoCal
I don't quite understand all of the support for Dark Pit. I understand that he is technically yet another villain to the line-up and some people may like the character, but really what does he bring to the table as his own character that makes him a worthy inclusion? And that's more of a general question than an attack on his supporters since I'd rather not attack other people for desiring a specific character in the game. Other than that little tease at the end of the Palutena trailer I don't see any real support for him being a potential character at all. And yes I also understand the Lucina situation and subtle differences make characters independent of one another, I just can't get the idea of Dark Pit as his own character in my mind honestly as something that is a reality for the new Smash. I could be incredibly wrong, but I don't see why he would be his own character honestly...
At the end of the day, he's just a feasible clone for Pit.

I just don't know if it's safe to assume that enough people enjoyed the way Pit played in Brawl / will play in Smash For for there to be a clone of him, like Marth and Fox.
Alright this my final roster until Ninka kiwi is confirmed fake:
Could be better, but seeing as you want to stick to this "leak" I'm dunno how much I could ask you to change.
I'm happy you put the Climbers back in, so thanks for that.
I would only accept those characters if Paper Dark Pit was among them.
You will only accept two veterans, a potentially very unique character, and krystal for that??
Are you even being serious right now?
 

Scamper52596

Smash Lord
Premium
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,200
Location
Florida
Oh I hate the sales argument, but you are saying that Pokemon, Mario, and Zelda should be equally represented and I was just wondering why? Metroid isn't represented as much as them, neither is any other series. Why those three? And why would developers be mad if their series has one less character than another series?
Edit: and the reason I brought up sales was I thought you were saying Mario Pokemon and Zelda were equally as popular. My apologies.
It just makes sense. Those are the three biggest franchises in Smash, and if one out represents the other, there are going to be unhappy fans. If Mario and Pokemon get six while Zelda gets five, people won't be happy when there are still plenty of Zelda characters they could have added. If Mario and Zelda get six, people will be mad that Mewtwo isn't on the roster, even though there's clearly room for him. Like Reila said, Mario is Nintendo's flagship franchise. Don't think Pokemon and Zelda are getting six while Mario sticks with five. Not saying it couldn't happen, just saying that I think it's unlikely. With all of the characters still at the developer's disposal, it would be less than desirable to not add them if they have the chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom