Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The Lethinuim, an enemy from Viridi's Forces of Nature.
Does anyone recognize the enemy in the bottom left corner? The closest thing to it I could find are the Pigtunias from Mother 3.
Probably Kid Icarus, with all the love it's getting.
Does anyone recognize the enemy in the bottom left corner? The closest thing to it I could find are the Pigtunias from Mother 3.
Dark Pit? Interesting discussion topic, thank you for bringing it up! I would hate to sound pretentious; however, I find those who believe that he is an alternate costume inept at speculation as they fail to comprehend Sakurai's very own words in favor of their biased opinions based on outdated precedence. Regardless, I am certain that his role will be amazing, even if he is not playable. I hope that he is confirmed as playable; however, so that I might play as Pittoo whilst my sister plays as Pit. It would certainly be glorious.
Welp, because of your statement about not wanting to see him, you had to see him one more time
Oh, we will certainly be seeing more Dark Pit in the future regardless of his fate.Welp, because of your statement about not wanting to see him, you had to see him one more time
Though I agree, knowing his fate would be nice.
Identifying Method of Operation is not a presumptuous perspective, it is studying the behaviors, statements, and habits of an individual to try to understand his or her thought process. To call it a presumptuous perspective is about as accurate as to claim that numerically analyzing the data we have been given on the roster we can identify the CSS or series representation.
Is there a way to "numerically analyze the data we have been given on the roster so that we can identify the CSS or series representation" in favor of Dark Pit? If not, I am not interested.
Wasn't this topic already up? I saw him on the same page while scrolling on my phone so I don't think I brought him.Dark Pit? Interesting discussion topic, thank you for bringing it up! I would hate to sound pretentious; however, I find those who believe that he is an alternate costume inept at speculation as they fail to comprehend Sakurai's very own words in favor of their biased opinions based on outdated precedence. Regardless, I am certain that his role will be amazing, even if he is not playable. I hope that he is confirmed as playable; however, so that I might play as Pittoo whilst my sister plays as Pit. It would certainly be glorious.
Dark Pit needs his own emoticon.
Did you perhaps misspell, "MorbidAltruism," as "someone"? I suppose you are correct, if it was not the current topic, I would have done everything in an attempt to change that.
I never considered such as they were already separate characters; HOWEVER, that is certainly a good point. I suppose it is entirely possible. I would probably still assert in favor of something more unprecedented inciting the change, but I have been wrong before (no, not I have not
).
It would be unprecedented no matter what the scenario, as we have never had Alt Characters before (or even the mention that they were in development, and likey they never were given the lack of true alt costumes until this game).I never considered such as they were already separate characters; HOWEVER, that is certainly a good point. I suppose it is entirely possible. I would probably still assert in favor of something more unprecedented inciting the change, but I have been wrong before (no, not I have not
Thank you! It is great when one comprehends the truth of the matter. Dark Pit is our Lord and savior, amen.
I have to admit, I rather dislike this concept of a "Lord and savior" character.
I don't know what your reasoning is, but I feel strongly the same. Whenever someone gets on a "lord and savior" kick with a character, I start to get offended, so I tend to step out of the conversation at that point. When Goomy was revealed for Pokémon X/Y, I became very uncomfortable.
Nah, I meant "someone."
A lot of religious people considered Pokemon to be the devil when it came out. *shrug*
I still believe that his lack of a confirmation in Palutena's trailer indicates that he's not playable. But some kind of role in the game, whether it's a special alternate costume or some kind of stage hazard, is practically guaranteed.Nah, I meant "someone."
There's nothing wrong with people supporting characters. I receive a lot of criticism for supporting Paper Mario, an alternate version of Mario, so I understand your points and I agree that the trailer increases his chance towards playability. However, I also think that the trailer could hint towards the following: Alt costume, stage hazard, or playability. I'm personally leaning towards a stage hazard at most.
I had no idea the world was that soft. Where were these people when Bayonetta was literally dismembering angels? I don't think religious overtones should be an issue in video games at all. They're a province of creative expression and it's already a shame that Sub-Zero's fatality introduced the rating system way back.
I won't pretend to have done much direct research on this issue, though I may now proceed to do so; but it has very little to do with being soft. I remember peripherally hearing that xbox was banned from one country for a long period of time, no?
But what if Ridley goes against all odds, becomes playable and is worshipped as the lord and savior of Smash speculation? would you dislike him then?
LOLWUT?
Woulnd't then Ganondorf, being the king of demons, also bother people then?
Talking about volatile subjects like those would be the fastest way to lose the voter base, so I will have to agree with you. I've forgotten that I live in U.S. myself and know exactly how touchy people can get over their personal convictions. I would like to clarify that I'm not trying to condemn these beliefs, but what I am saying is that they shouldn't play an active part in regulating how a video game is developed. I think the censorship system we have in place right now will suffice. Why a country would go a step beyond and ban an entire system escapes me. I'm going off topic here, though.
First of all, Robin was the one who saved Smash speculation.But what if Ridley goes against all odds, becomes playable and is worshipped as the lord and savior of Smash speculation? would you dislike him then?
Ganondorf is the gerudo king, ghirahim is the demon lord.
Ghirahim deconfirmed for Smash.
Are we really going to get into the facade of the de jure law separating church and state versus the de facto implementation of its practice?
You will eventually have to fall into the salvation of Dark Pithism, you cannot escape!
That's what was said about Gematsu.
And Hades will be the new Messiah then.That's what was said about Gematsu.
I don't have to if Dark Pit isn't a separate playable character.
Your point is still absolutely asinine. Bringing up people's sensibilities as a point AGAINST dark pit is a null point, since there's content throughout all media pertaining to religiosity and evil. Just because Dark Pit is "a fallen angel" we can't have him in the game? Let's just ignore the fact that he is NOTHING like the figure of Lucifer in the Biblical story.
And if he does become a character, I have my new punching-bag.
