Pink Lemonade
Smash Rookie
@X1: Alright thx for explaining dude. I'll keep that in mind.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Though his read on me is shaky, I'm also reading it as clueless town.@DH: what do you think about dooms?
You would if you had a town read on RR (maybe). Why do you respond to RR in such a manner? You could have told him "No, I'm not into alliances they're bad cuz of mojo jojo"
I mean I don't see how you can expect RR to know that you really hate alliances. Seems like you said this to seem town, rather, saying what a townie 'should' say.This is an incredible reach, and shoves words down Dooms' throat. It makes me think that dooms and pink are on different alignments
Creating a town alliance when there are no reads out there is completely pointless. If they're scum, they manipulate you early. If they're town, then they don't know your role/alignment, so it shows that they're easily manipulated, making it easier for the scum. There is literally no legit town purpose behind it. Plus, I stopped considering the townie aspects to it when he reacted so poorly after Kantrip/Dark Horse broke it off.I don't like dooms. He isn't really looking at Axel's intent, and just trying to seem town by being against his town alliance thing. His response to RR was a bit abrasive too, I don't see why he responded like that.
Vote: Dooms
Nope. He didn't. He said he "lost the quote" when responding to me.Did he ever answer this? Since he replaced out, guess it's moot. Let me tell you my thoughts on Axel.
I think he made an alliance with DH and Kantrip to test their motives. Underlined, Notice how he came in, voted, and didn't propose anything to the alliance. What was your thought on that?
Wasn't him specifically, it was anyone that played that way. I don't know if there are any other players in here that are like that, so I'm not sure.Now that Zen replaced out, I think you don't need this anymore correct? If the town is un-trustworthy than l-2 is fine enough.
Dark Horse down at the bottom.Underlined, I want you to explain why you liked Dark Horse, and why you disliked us.
Look at this quote, for example. You're defending your reasoning for questioning and scummy play with things like "that's a pretty good reason...", which shows you're trying to play it off as scummy when really it's just null. Asking why someone voted the mod or doesn't vote in RVS also doesn't spark discussion, although that doesn't make you seem scummy.2. So what? There is nothing wrong with voting RVS vote with that reason. ****, that's a pretty good reason for an RVS vote. He could be nervous because he is voting a scumbuddy to distance. Or maybe he is just nervous. Don't expect me to do nothing. Plus, asking these questions can get discussion going in RVS, and that is what I like to do in RVS baby.
You're acting like Dark Horse asking you for reads is saying nothing at all and doesn't show his opinion of you at all. It lines up with his earlier line of questioning and his response, saying that you didn't have any legit reads even though you've been a lively poster.@Inferno: Thanks.
@DH:
No, Dh, it doesn't. See, you have asked me for reads right after my first post. I don't see how you can expect me to have a read when I JUST posted my first post. Does this make sense?
Now then. We have gone over this twice now, yet you haven't voted me for it, or agreed to my lynch, until Axel proposed it. So I assumed you agreed with his reasons. Earlier you said "Pardon me, I don't want to drag this out" What was the meaning of that?
You yourself haven't given reads, nor have you DONE anything to garner reads, and you expect others (like myself) to do your work for you. You ask me to give reads to look like you are scumhunting, but you are not. You are backseat scumhunting, and you agree to my lynch only because I haven't given a read yet, even though I had done much more. Mafia isn't all about 'giving reads/not giving reads'. You even parroted my question to joey about his 'paranoia' trying to look useful.
I'm getting a very bad impression from you DH. Explain yourself~
Vote: Darkhose
Why would ANYONE want to form an alliance this early in the game when there is no way that we can have reads on most of the players (since only 4-5 seriously posted a lot in the pre-game that shouldn't have happened)? I understand why Ryu would, which is why I don't seriously question him on it. You're also not understanding how Ryu responded to it. If I was doubting him for it or "expecting Ryu to know that I hate alliances", then I would have backed up my questioning and called him scummy for it. Where's all that at?You would if you had a town read on RR (maybe). Why do you respond to RR in such a manner? You could have told him "No, I'm not into alliances they're bad cuz of mojo jojo"
I mean I don't see how you can expect RR to know that you really hate alliances. Seems like you said this to seem town, rather, saying what a townie 'should' say.
His conversation with & read on PL are mainly the reasons why I think DH town. His push on RR, while I don't necessarily agree with it, is also something that I like. It shows very obvious intent to scum hunt. Also, the pushes against him are very weak, and convince me that he's more town due to them being so poor instead of the vise-versa. Example would be PL's push.So what is your DH read then? You promised to look over it but haven't? You're still avoiding giving this read... why is this??
If he's going to be perturbed by posts in a game about emotional and logical manipulation, that's more his fault than yours.Like seriously, I was trying to gambit reactions but I think I legitimately made Zen feel bad about playing, like **** I feel like a total *******.
Does this make you town too? Because this is just as ********, if not moreso.Axel is probably town because he's putting himself out in the open with the stupidest stuff ever (his turning it into a dictatorship doesn't seem like a scum move to me, it seems like a stupid arrogant town move). Also Dark Horse and Axel aren't scummates because of how it went down.
Wow you must be REALLY town if your standard is correct. This is about as ******** as it gets.I am more than fine with these consequences. I WANT a string of PRs to claim among inactive/"useless" players. That gives scum a hard choice of what to go for: Players who are a force in the Day, or players who have PRs.
What do you make of OS from pregame?
Pre-game OS just comes off to me as kinda lazy and not really having balls. "Hey guys I'm gonna copy this dudes vote NO MATTER WHAT! Oh but btw I totally am reserving the right to renege on this if I "find" someone who I really want to vote for."is it okay if we toss that question to frozen? i think itd be a good question for him. i wonder why you specifically want me to answer it
i was hoping youd forget about that question actually
DH said:Pink, what's your read on OS?
Too early to base?
If it's too early to base, then why have you voted marshy?
Hmmm, weird way to start out the your game DH. Obviously Ran doesn't have a read at this point in the game, so it seems like a pointless ice breaker. Also, you ended it in a strange way to. You weren't really dragging anything out so why did you feel you were?Pardon me. Don't want to drag this out.
Kantrip wrt Axel said:Seems awfully structured when there's no penalty for denying the majority. Anyone can just vote regardless of the majority decision, and then what?
I am strongly opposed to "obey the majority or be scum". For one, it completely obstructs my ability to read anyone in the group except for the one who puts forth an idea. Everyone else is basically either sheeping the idea or choosing to oppose the idea. At this point, there's no more free will. If the votes are 2 to 1 and the 1 really doesn't want to be forced to do something they don't agree with, we're gonna declare 'em scum for that?
Not only that, but there's the chance of scum in our alliance pretty easily. I have to ask, by which merits was Dark Horse admitted? What made you invite him when you did?
Yeah I agree with Kantrip here. Seems like an arbitrary system without any real benefit. Nothing bad, just nothing good either and pointless. Sure you get voting power but you should probably of been doing that anyways. Also I don't see why evaluation periods have to wait until a certain day or the benefit of that.The alliance would still require you convince everyone else to vote with you, which is something one should expect to do anyways. In short, it's either completely redundant or a hindrance.
Last experience I had with something that called itself the "town alliance" was in Majora's Mask. It contained 2 members of the mafia AND the indy in that game, and the group's first order of business was bussing and lynching a third mafioso for town points for the whole group.
I'm open to bouncing ideas off of each other and voting together sometimes, but I'm not committing to anything that will obstruct the game in such a way such an alliance would.
Yo, you probably won't see this but you in Orlando? If so, wanta do a Dgames real life meet up?Chaco said:Yo, I'm out of town currently in Florida, but I'll be back on Monday.
Really? Why? Seems like a mechanical reason to have someone on your radar. No one really jumped on Zen's idea btw, Zen invited people into the group.Chaco said:Those who jumped on your idea are now on my radar. Clever, Zen.
Like this post, especially to bold. MY thoughts exactly. Like your play in general, I get a sense of Ran with curiosity which I like. You can be town for now.Ran said:@Inferno: Thanks.
@DH:
No, Dh, it doesn't. See, you have asked me for reads right after my first post. I don't see how you can expect me to have a read when I JUST posted my first post. Does this make sense?
Now then. We have gone over this twice now, yet you haven't voted me for it, or agreed to my lynch, until Axel proposed it. So I assumed you agreed with his reasons. Earlier you said "Pardon me, I don't want to drag this out" What was the meaning of that?
You yourself haven't given reads, nor have you DONE anything to garner reads, and you expect others (like myself) to do your work for you. You ask me to give reads to look like you are scumhunting, but you are not. You are backseat scumhunting, and you agree to my lynch only because I haven't given a read yet, even though I had done much more. Mafia isn't all about 'giving reads/not giving reads'. You even parroted my question to joey about his 'paranoia' trying to look useful.
I'm getting a very bad impression from you DH. Explain yourself~
Vote: Darkhose
Eww, gross.Axel said:Stuff about not liking Ran (and Joey) and why
Not convinced. Still feels like a mechanical way of viewing things to me.Chaco said:@PL: Jumping quickly onto a something that "implies" you as town, in an alliance, is more than likely to have a scum member jumping on. Therefore, I marked the joiners on my radar, because I feel this is highly likely. Like voting patterns yknow? Middle of wagon; more likely to be scum. That doesn't necessarily hold as true as it once did, but with this being a a play on that "law", I feel it would do well to take interest in those who jumped on.
Oh hey X1 already got 5 votes? What's this about?Gorf said:X1-12- (5) Kantrip, Red Ruy, Macman, J, Marshy
To be fair scum typically do not push themselves obviously into the spotlight on early D1 - unless you find this to be a common scum tactic? I'm pretty sure you could infer from Kant's post that he's saying "does not match up with typical D1 scum play -> is less likely to be scum"Does this make you town too? Because this is just as ********, if not moreso.
Since when does drawing attention to yourself early game and throwing around questionable ideas make someone town out of no where?
I could buy a meta argument about how Axel might not normally do something like that, but without any explanation as to why a player exhibiting X behavior is unlikely as a specific alignment other than just "lol its too risky and dumb and there's no way he'd do that as scum lulllllllz" I don't buy it at all.
When you remember the size of OS' ego are you actually surprised that he's presenting his actions like he's better than he is? What is you're actual read on OS and what does the above have to do with it? This is non-contentIt's like he's trying to act like a risky hard *** binding his vote to someone for the shock value, but then leaving himself and easy opt out whenever he feels like. Not ballsy at all. He's presenting his actions like he's being reckless or risky but without that actually being the case. The whole thing just seems kinda half-*****/whimsical. Not your typical OS behavior IMO.
Have you not read a DH vs Ranmaru before?You weren't really dragging anything out so why did you feel you were?
Don't you think OS just likes mental masturbating?Agree with Zen's 102 (J doesn't exist). Totally superfluous post. Only real thing it accomplishes is OS finishing up his mental masturbation session. Don't see the town intent in it and it seems to me that OS is trying too hard in that post.
[yt]_OemNp6hgX4[/yt]@Mod: Request that people have to type out my full username to vote me.
I could have brought up stuff about what I thought of OS at the time, but I then realized that that really wouldn't lead anywhere, and the conversation would just drag out.You weren't really dragging anything out so why did you feel you were?
Really KevinM? I mean, I guess you can go immediately defending someone else before they have a chance to respond to it themselves and make their job easier, but I don't think that's a very classy thing to doYou can't say someone is SERIOUSLY scum, link it to someone else's playstyle in a different game and just say opportunism without pointing out the reasoning behind it..
You come out with a lot of heavy words here and absolutely no backing..
On what basis are you saying that typically scum don't push themselves into the spotlight early day 1? So just because someone does something aptypical of what a typical scum might do, we should give them a free pass for that action? That's ****ing ********.To be fair scum typically do not push themselves obviously into the spotlight on early D1 - unless you find this to be a common scum tactic? I'm pretty sure you could infer from Kant's post that he's saying "does not match up with typical D1 scum play -> is less likely to be scum"
OS's alleged ego has nothing to do with the machinery behind the method of behavior he pretended to lock himself into.When you remember the size of OS' ego are you actually surprised that he's presenting his actions like he's better than he is? What is you're actual read on OS and what does the above have to do with it? This is non-content
Cool, you called me aggressive, an opportunist, and "forced". Oh and man, look at all that analysis. Totally not just labeling and namecalling. You really got me good dude. Man, I wish I could make as compelling an argument as you by just throwing negative descriptors out there and acting as if I actually made a point.Don't have much time here but I've got to say frozenflame's jump onto me screams opportunism. The wording of it is very aggressive and as a result comes off forced as well. It reminds me heavily of adumbrodeus' scum push on me D1 in Britches and Hose.
In short, frozenflame is seriously scum. The time for joking is done. Serious time, starting now.
More pressure on this guy please? I throw a few criticisms at him and he immediately kneejerks coming out swinging with a "OMG FF MUST BE SCUM" stance just because I attacked him, and with no real substantiation. If thats how much he reacts to a single attack and vote, we should have a novel's worth of content that proves he's scum after a few more votes lol.You can't say someone is SERIOUSLY scum, link it to someone else's playstyle in a different game and just say opportunism without pointing out the reasoning behind it..
You come out with a lot of heavy words here and absolutely no backing..
-No I haven't. Does it matter? I don't think I should assume that meta was the reason. Plus the interaction still started weird on DH's part.To be fair scum typically do not push themselves obviously into the spotlight on early D1 - unless you find this to be a common scum tactic? I'm pretty sure you could infer from Kant's post that he's saying "does not match up with typical D1 scum play -> is less likely to be scum"
When you remember the size of OS' ego are you actually surprised that he's presenting his actions like he's better than he is? What is you're actual read on OS and what does the above have to do with it? This is non-content
Vote: FrozenFlame
Have you not read a DH vs Ranmaru before?
Don't you think OS just likes mental masturbating?
Also Kuzzai do you like Kanty? And where do you stand on FF?
MMM okay, it's still an awkward question for you to ask but fair enough.I could have brought up stuff about what I thought of OS at the time, but I then realized that that really wouldn't lead anywhere, and the conversation would just drag out.
That's why I decided to stop there.
It doesn't really have merit without context, though. If you admit it was a mechanical way of looking at things, then why do it like that?Just returned from a hellish car drive....
And no, I was in Panama City. Got arrested too while there. Whoo!
Anyways, Kafk, I was skimming on my phone and thought that they jumped onto Zens idea. And yeah, it is a mechanical way to look at things, but had they jumped on it, it pulse held merit. However, it's nothing.
I'll read more than the last page shortly.
Interesting. I would actually take this as null. Joey, what is your read on OS?Creating a town alliance when there are no reads out there is completely pointless. If they're scum, they manipulate you early. If they're town, then they don't know your role/alignment, so it shows that they're easily manipulated, making it easier for the scum. There is literally no legit town purpose behind it. Plus, I stopped considering the townie aspects to it when he reacted so poorly after Kantrip/Dark Horse broke it off.
Yes, I have a town read on Axel. The ran side.Nope. He didn't. He said he "lost the quote" when responding to me.
Can I assume that you have a town read on Axel since you're saying that the alliance could only have a town purpose?
Well, you can't propose thoughts to an alliance that is broken up, so no thoughts on it.
Ah, ok. Well I think l-2 or l-1 is fine. Also keep in mind the more votes the more info we have upon that person's flip. Consider that votes show INTENT to lynch that person. So the more votes the more options to find scum. If someone is at l-1, and hammers, they'll be looked at the next day. Although if I feel the town cannot be trusted (newbs/dumbtownies) I'd be ok with L-2. But I don't think it is needed.Wasn't him specifically, it was anyone that played that way. I don't know if there are any other players in here that are like that, so I'm not sure.
I don't think so. Carrying on.Dark Horse down at the bottom.
I dislike your slot because of your pushes. They're really bad.
It's true, your reason for voting Chaco is a damn good reason to vote him in RVS. (I loved it, it was really funny) I always like joke voting in RVS, so I don't see why you would be afraid if that counted. This also shows that you are paranoid about voting someone because you don't want to 'appear' scummy, a fear only scum would have. Only scum worry about appearances. If you were town you would have voted Chaco once the game started and not give a ****. Asking why someone isn't voting in RVS does spark discussion. It goes into "Oh hey why didn't you vote in RVS, don't you want to help it progress?" etc etc. I think you underestimate how good RVS is bro.Look at this quote, for example. You're defending your reasoning for questioning and scummy play with things like "that's a pretty good reason...", which shows you're trying to play it off as scummy when really it's just null. Asking why someone voted the mod or doesn't vote in RVS also doesn't spark discussion, although that doesn't make you seem scummy.
Your DH vote is also very ****ty.
Underlined, it does say nothing at all. You can't have an opinion on someone from their very first post. Sure you can ask them questions, but it is very odd to expect a read from that person after just getting into the game. DH didn't have an opinion on me, at all. Also notice how I responded to his reasons for his suspicion on me, and he didn't reply to them. What do you think of that?You're acting like Dark Horse asking you for reads is saying nothing at all and doesn't show his opinion of you at all. It lines up with his earlier line of questioning and his response, saying that you didn't have any legit reads even though you've been a lively poster.
You're also pushing him for not wanting to lynch you when he's (at the time) part of an alliance that only lynches with a group majority, which explains why he hadn't voted you. You're, again, trying to make it seem like this is a bigger point towards him being scummy than it really is.
Him asking you for reads three times (the second of which, you didn't even respond to) shows that he is trying to get information from you, and him debating with Overswarm shows that he's trying to get a read on him as well. You're acting like he's not doing anything, when he's questioning you, debating with OS, and trying to work on the logistics behind the alliance he had. He was doing way more than you, and your generalization of what he has done just convinces me that you're anti town. Your defense is also very week and moot because all you've done is ask baseless questions such as "Why does it matter if it's a legit vote," or "Why did you vote the mod?"
Vote: Pink Lemonade
See, you can understand why RR would. I can understand why Zen would do this. I have played with him plenty of times, hydrad with him, and played him plenty of times in the 2 person mafia. (Consider that 2 person mafia really helps with getting to know how a person might play, but I don't bank my knowledge of his play on that only) Yet again, you did not see his intent. Zen would want to form an alliance to gauge people's reactions (Like DH's and Kantrips), and I'm not saying always. I'm saying in this game, that was what it seemed like to me. You are looking at it in a black and white perspective. Some people don't like alliances, some do. I don't really care about them really. I'd just push my suspects and I would direct questions to the alliance if there was one.Why would ANYONE want to form an alliance this early in the game when there is no way that we can have reads on most of the players (since only 4-5 seriously posted a lot in the pre-game that shouldn't have happened)? I understand why Ryu would, which is why I don't seriously question him on it. You're also not understanding how Ryu responded to it. If I was doubting him for it or "expecting Ryu to know that I hate alliances", then I would have backed up my questioning and called him scummy for it. Where's all that at?
By the way, your reasoning in the last sentence is trying to make something seem bigger than it really is. Explain how it's something I'd say to look townie instead of something that I'd say as townie.
Alright, let me clarify something. I'm not spinning your motives around at all. I doubt you are scum with frozenflame after your move, whether you want to call it calling me out or defending frozenflame is no difference to me. You're doing both either way. My point was never indicating anything about your alignment, and I didn't mean to make an inference of such. I can say now that I don't think you and frozenflame are scum together at all, and it's not a scummate defense. It is possible that it is scum defending town, but I'm not going to try to make that call at this point.I'm not defending someone.. he still has to respond to your accusations but currently you haven't made any, you're making it literally impossible to read why you think he's scum. Nice attempt at spinning my motives around but I'm calling you out not defending FF. If you're going to say you're SERIOUS about someone being scum and saying they're opportunistic you need to say go into a little more detail.
I have played twice with him I believe. He will put someone in their place if he thinks they are wrong or just being scummy. So yeah, should be in character for him.Does anyone have experience playing with frozenflame? I want someone with experience against him to talk to me about his #346. Specifically the stuff talking to X1. Is this in-character for frozenflame? All the swearing and violent phrasing, I mean. I am NOT trying to infer anything at this time, so don't jump down my throat about this. It just seems like he's talking to X1 with more apprehension than when he's responding to me, which is weird considering atm he thinks I'm more of a moron
I gave one, I would like your thoughts on it.I could buy a meta argument about how Axel might not normally do something like that, but without any explanation as to why a player exhibiting X behavior is unlikely as a specific alignment other than just "lol its too risky and dumb and there's no way he'd do that as scum lulllllllz" I don't buy it at all.
May I ask, what is your read on OS?Pre-game OS just comes off to me as kinda lazy and not really having balls. "Hey guys I'm gonna copy this dudes vote NO MATTER WHAT! Oh but btw I totally am reserving the right to renege on this if I "find" someone who I really want to vote for."
Translation: I really don't feel like actively using my vote so I'll just functionally give it to someone to see how they react to it/use it and then I'll stop doing that once I actually feel like pushing the game in a different direction.
It's like he's trying to act like a risky hard *** binding his vote to someone for the shock value, but then leaving himself and easy opt out whenever he feels like. Not ballsy at all. He's presenting his actions like he's being reckless or risky but without that actually being the case. The whole thing just seems kinda half-*****/whimsical. Not your typical OS behavior IMO.
This on its own I could see as an adequate response if FF normally lashes out like this when he feels someone is being stupid. Personally, as scum, the last sentence here is exactly the sort of thing I'd add onto posts addressing scummates of mine for distancing purposes. I can't fairly compare something I do to something someone else does though, which is why I wanted to know if this behaviour was in-character for FF.On what basis are you saying that typically scum don't push themselves into the spotlight early day 1? So just because someone does something aptypical of what a typical scum might do, we should give them a free pass for that action? That's ****ing ********.
I would have just assumed it was regular and not asked about it had FF not continued with this. After saying X1 was being "****ing ********", FF proceeded to explain why anyways. I can't put into words why this bugs me, and I just know I'm going to get called out for it being baseless, but something about the point of being really abrasive and then being calm as you explain afterwards leads me to believing the anger was faked. That's all I can really describe it as.Putting yourself into the spotlight early day one doesn't have to be a scum tactic to make it scummy, or abdicate it of being pro-town. I think him putting himself into the spotlight early on is value neutral in terms of his alignment, and I think his CONTENT (which is what actually matters by the way, his vocalness is just a matter of playstyle) is scummy.
Ugh, as I read this over I'm second guessing myself. I can actually see what FF means wrt X1 and maybe the behaviour is warranted. It's kind of like a "slap you for being dumb and then explain it really slowly" type of thing. Last paragraph is really what caught my eye. A lot of censored stuff when I didn't think at the time there was anything to be THAT angry about. If FF is as you say then I can actually see this behaviour lining up.Arguing that just because someone is acting atypically they are less likely to be scum because they wouldn't want to be atypical as scum and draw attention to themselves for it is seriously like n00b level argument. How bad do you think people are at this game as scum?
OS's alleged ego has nothing to do with the machinery behind the method of behavior he pretended to lock himself into.
You call my analysis non-content when you yourself have spouted nothing but bull**** about how atypical behavior somehow means someone is less likely to be scum (awful, shallow analysis that doesn't even differentiate between playstyle, role strategy, and alignment) and about how somehow OS's ego makes him a special case when analyzing his current content. Yeah, no, you can **** off with that ****.