Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sure, people can continue to express opinions. But unless they're in line with El Nino and Praxis, then those opinions are wrong.
Jam, pretend there is no death sentence, nor a freedom to meet in all of this. Look at two variables: The woman's character, and the decision that was made. I disagree with the verdict, because something is screwy about this woman. Regardless of evidence. My psychological senses are tingling, and I disagree with the verdict. That is all I am saying..
Probably a good thing they found her guilty of giving false information to a police officer then, isn't it?
I read about that a loooooooooooooong time ago.
How? If you completely ignore the death sentence or the freedom part, and just look at the choice that was given.. You can't prove it either way. How can you not make the decision that there IS something damn funky about this chick. This is - NOT- about her death sentence, nor freedom. It's about her inability to actually protray herself as a woman you can believe to be innocent..We all have a right to express our mixed feelings. Sue me for not believing this woman who can't convince me of not being guilty. I don't care if the evidence wasn't enough. Anybody who knows they are innocent shouldn't be acting so shady. Her guilty conscious was displaying so many red flags.
1. Your font is hard to read.
Anybody else reads it just fine. Please state exactly how each reason why you believe I can't get my points across again. Are you sure you aren't just shutting me out, because we disagree with each other? My font is not hard to read. When I used red.. Thats when you should complain.
Really, the size of this text is bigger than any significance in anything you have said thus far.
You act like their choice was fact. You cannot tell me that woman doesn't look off. An opinion is an opinion. I already stated we cannot prove whether she did it or not. So how can anyone justify ANYONE's opinions?
Lol. I wish I could apply this to real life.
Also, the convictions in the Central Park jogger case that were later overturned.
Well, here's another way to look at it. Not everyone lies to cover up a meticulously planned murder. Some people just lie because of an emotional problem.
Alright, lets exercise this perspective you layed out for me. You have a personal experience with individuals who reacted for all of the wrong reasons because they couldn't handle the burden. Yes? Then tell me why Anthony seemed like she was determined to get through that. Not being able to handle burdens, and the way she was DETERMINED to defend herself. How do these two entirely different psychological defenses apply?
Well, I think when you're facing the death penalty, your sense of self-preservation kicks in and overrides your other emotional hangups.
LOL.
The girl you relate to Anthony obviously has problems, and has formed a deadly inferiority complex. Anthony on the other hand, doesn't have that sadness that feels genuine when she cries and can't be condemned for logical reasons. Humans have micro emotions that our subconscious can read before our conscious mind-which is why we get these weird feelings in our gut.
Lemme explain my view on this more clearly. I wasn't awake that day. "No johns" I know I know...
Nah, I think this is more fitting.
I understand that. But no one by law can be convicted on their character. And I personally try not to pass judgment based on character alone.
The idea is that the opposite line of reasoning would lead to the development of an authoritarian government. Authoritarian systems favor security above individual freedom. They almost always have highly questionable human rights records. The core principle is that one corrupt individual cannot do the amount of damage that an entire corrupt system can do.
What about limiting freedoms so legitimate measures can be taken but then reassign said freedoms so the system doesn't become corrupt in the long run?
No, no, no. I am stating -why- I disagree with Anthony's verdict, because of her lopsided character. I am trying to -say- that there is something off about her, and this draws me to -question- the results. I question the verdict.. Through obvious logic instinct. -Something- is off about her. I -have- a right to question her, and the verdict because of it.
-There- is -no- reason -for- you to -****ing- troll -everything- in the god damn -forums-.
Psh. Trolls have no feelings, or tastes. 8D
If one person kills one child, that's one tragedy. But a judicial system that routinely executes children without fair trial would amount to thousands of tragedies.
Sounds like you're basing it off of a gut instinct, and that's fine. But it's just hard for other people to relate to that since we don't have your same instinct.
You can turn it around, Switch. You just gotta believe.
Its so entertaining though.
But no one cares that your psychological senses are tingling. That doesn't matter. Ever. You can't discard evidence in a case because of how you 'feel' about someone. Even you should be able to realize that.
I argue there are not enough. **** used to be funnier than this.