sneakytako
Smash Lord
What protects my partner from NK rake?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I would if I was scum and knew I could get away with it.You live and learn. Although, do recognize that we also wouldn't try to trick you in an open setting as scum. ^______________^;;;;;;
When I've been drinking and not even read the game that much, nah not much to say.Lynch Joker, ask questions later.
RR, give me something tangible and delicious.
Fluff, lackluster contribution. Don't like his earlier questions and seems like he's trying to come off as though he's actually contributing.^ yea I was gonna mention this... He can't do that
I'm actually really ok with this lynch, honestly. Would shoot, but I'm saving that for RR in the event that he doesn't find himself coherent enough to read and outline his thought process so far.
Shot because he was suspicious at that time, but we should hold off on that right now.Why shot / lynched ?
Who are you looking into now?
Nothing changedWhat changed between these two posts ?
The "but" was supposed to mean that I'm holding off on the uninformed.Why would you default to uniformed but still want him shot ?
That was it, and to get opinions on what I was thinking.This is pointless.
Explain why you brought up his prod-dodge beyond to press people to see what they think.
Alrighty.Please never use wifom reasoning like this on a slot again.
So I wanna buddy with bar. I wonder if he's alright with that.
Bar, think of batman and robin.
We're that kind of team if we bud.
Vinyl and Kantrip, sitting in a tree. S-C-U-M-M-M.... EEEE.Oh come on, it's not fishy, it's just dumb looking,
If he was assuming that it was a role that killed you for being inactive, I can understand the assumption that it would be a scum role. Keeping scum from being a lurking/inactive ******* that nobody can read sounds like a legit restriction.
I didn't know **** about the role until it was fully explained here, cuz I couldn't find anything about it either. Now sure what the hell he was reading about it.
Joker+Tako too.EBWOP: *Not* sure what he was reading
No no, not only that it's "only been a town role". The important part here is that it's ONLY been an OS role minus Zen's OS Deadpool tribute game.What he says doesn't add up. He seems to have known a decent bit about the ability since he asked Rake to stop posting to see if that led to a modkill, but if he knew that, I'm not sure where exactly he got the scum implication from because as Bardull said, it's only been a town role.
Not all things are null tells. Almost nothing in a mafia game is a null tell.Believe me, I'm as confused about how he came to that conclusion as you are. But it boils down to him just not understanding the role. If Tako was scum, it still doesn't make sense for him to assume chatterbox = scum. Regardless of his alignment, all it means is that he's dumb
Kantrip, I want you to realize you just expected us all to believe that you simotaneously felt the need to use a large font "WUT" to describe Tako's actions, yet will accept him as town. That makes no sense.Good question.
There was actually nothing scummy about Vinyl's post. My intent was to skip RVS as much as possible. I think I accomplished this and started the game off with actual discussion. You're welcome.
Rake's jump on me felt sincere.
The vote is fine, and providing reasoning is great, but this is really scummy. Your jump on my wagon is such a safe cop-out, I don't think this is legitimate.
Wut.
Wut.
@Tako: Where did you learn about the chatterbox restriction?
While I won't argue with your choice of shot, I would like you to explain how Tako could be scum right now. I'm just not seeing it.
This is grimy. The first paragraph comes off as joking, and then you go and say he's painting Rake in a bad light. What are you implying with that? Because I'm getting an implication that you're hinting at Tako scum since "painting Rake in a bad light" is not a town thing to do.
Leaning town on Rake, scum on Joker. I doubt they are scum together.
Tako town, Bardull null.
Vote: Joker
I wish. Being a bad guy is more interesting.I'm interested in the BSP scum lean. The duder's been town in lots of past games, so I can really guess freely that he could be scum this time.
I like that.
How does one make a case for being town? The real question is, where's your case for me as scum, because all you've done is post little inklings that hardly support a solid scumread.Anyone have a case for JokerTown? Lay it on me.
JD, I secretly love you and expect big things from yourpantsslot. Don't agree with KantyScum though, talk to me about it. Tako is most likely fine.
Kantrip I'll be straight with you: you can't blow off someone else's actions as "must have been looking for reactions he's a genius" without actually being them. You aren't them, you can't know that unless you have a QT with them, and right now that's very likely considering both of your overall scummy play.You... you seriously think his goal in the long run was getting you lynched?
Oh my, Rake....
I have a suggestion for you. Think first. Ask questions later. Vote even later than that. Right now you're going with a hybrid of vote first, ask questions later and vote first, ask questions later, proceed to not care about the questions anymore, and skip the thinking part altogether.
@BSP's last post: I agree. I have absolutely no idea wtf Tako is thinking, but I also have no idea wtf anyone who finds his shenanigans scummy is thinking either.
Here's an example. What were you trying to achieve with this? How are you progressing the game forward by posting this as a response? Are you just trolling, or was this an actual response to my assertion of JokerScum?
It was a little bit of both. I found your assertion of jokerscum to be kinda ridiculous. I'm trying to have fun this game, but I disagree with the notion that I haven't contributed anything.Here's an example. What were you trying to achieve with this? How are you progressing the game forward by posting this as a response? Are you just trolling, or was this an actual response to my assertion of JokerScum?
See, we need more of this.and if you're concerned over me not contributing my thoughts, I'll go ahead and mention this
I don't like Kantrip because of his backpedaling. (In fact, practically everyone in this game has thrown out some BS tactic/gambit at the start, and overall it's pretty frustrating trying to read any of it, because everyone is making it abundantly clear that nothing means anything, because everyone is lying all the time for no reason.) I single out Kantrip because I happened to find his BS the least believable, because he actually targeted a player with his shenanigan, then backdoor'd his way out when a wagon began forming on him for it.
I wouldn't know what Kantrip's experience is, because he never answered any of the times that people asked him.See, we need more of this.
Kantrip's RVS post was some seriously silly shenanigans and reads to me as Kantrip playing RVS. Kantrip has been playing Mafia long enough to the point where he wouldn't grasp at something as small as a confirm post, doing that is literally the dumbest thing on the planet and luckily for the both of us, Kantrip isn't that stupid.
I'm focusing on you, Rake comes later if and when he comes within my sights as a juvenile.It was a little bit of both. I found your assertion of jokerscum to be kinda ridiculous. I'm trying to have fun this game, but I disagree with the notion that I haven't contributed anything.
Also I dunno why you're pushing me when Rake is sheeping it up so hard. He jumps on my wagon immediately after your vote, gives no reason, then asks you what your reason is so he can agree/disagree with it.
Kantrip has been playing on Dgames for at least a year or so. Off and on afaik, but generally consistent.I wouldn't know what Kantrip's experience is, because he never answered any of the times that people asked him.
and RVS aside, I wasn't all that satisfied with his justification for why he did it. Seemed to me more like he was hoping for people to jump on the Vinyltrain with him, and when it didn't happen, he just claimed it was a silly joke.
Hi guys I'm back.
So my explanation to my rake reasoning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq7y3ecRxn4
Seriously, I thought chatterbox was almost always scum, I just remembered it wrong. I was 100% sure chatterboxes were scum, and I thought the idea that town chatterboxes were blasphemous.
Other than that I really have no explanation. I really can't defend myself since it does look scummy from an objective point of view, even if it is a ridiculous scum move. And if I play myself off that I was stupid, I can't stop you from suspecting that this was all deliberate.
But if you do decide to lynch/NK me, I'd like some heads up because my role can help clear up the role of another player. Depending on how the rest of toDay goes I'll reveal my hints if I'm going to die, but honestly I'd like to wait to make this play until I know ima dead.
If you guys lynch me I have no one to blame but myself. But I promise to help town the best I can for the remaining time I may have left.
I thought this was kinda obvious, but the point is that he thought he fully understood the role. Clearly, he did not, and he sees that now.PS: I just got to Tako's explaination, he explained it poorly.
Here's the problem: how could you even not remember something that you used to paint someone as scummy, then you later claim you didn't understand enough about to realize it wasn't a normal mafia role. For you to even know of the role you'd have had to find it in an OS Game/Deadpool Mafia, wherein all Deadpools from OS were town and everyone in the entire game (scum AND town) were chatterbox in Deadpool Mafia. Then you'd have to twist that role enough that you'd decide you wanted to use it to paint suspicion on someone as a mostly scum role, then claim to have simply forgotten that it isn't one... while still knowing about the role in the first place? It doesn't follow, you don't forget something you just learned about. You misunderstand it, you don't forget.
You say specifically "The idea of town chatterbox is blasphemous". You don't get that opinion by claiming not to know a role inside and out. It's just not logical for a town to bring up, and especially not at the point you did when there really wasn't that much posting by Rake for you to accuse him of it reasonably, even in an OS game.
That's a terrible scum team read, and the second idea will get you modkilled. No code.Why do you care if I PM John? I could lie about it and tell him he confirmed anyway.
I'm going with Rake/Bardul scum right now, they are trying to get me to slip by not trusting my partner.
@Riddle: That's an awesome idea, I'll make a cypher to reveal later.