Witchking_of_Angmar
Smash Lord
Because it raises their post count.Why has everyone been feeding this troll for 8 pages..?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because it raises their post count.Why has everyone been feeding this troll for 8 pages..?
Alright, I'll get back to you on that.Get something to support your claim, and come back. Until then, I've won the argument. At least read my post.
I'm trying to help you help me by being nice, but your heart just isn't there.Kiss *** alert....
I have no pent up anger infact I was trying to be nice at the start but you destroyed that by being .... "special"
Sorry if I'm ignoring some peoples' posts, it's hard to keep up with a good chunk of the community worked up like this.eh, Angoku had a point there on me.
He's ignoring the posts simply because he doesn't really have a good reply for any of them.
I know right.Why has everyone been feeding this troll for 8 pages..?
That seems quite arrogant of you don't you think?But see, I won't have to anymore. I've resisted learning the technique this long and now my comfortableness with a non-wavedashing game-style is paying off and I'm happy.
And no, I shouldn't be forced to learn how to wavedash to combat wavedashers. Wavedashers will now have to learn how to not wavedash to combat me. Which is how it should be.
See, I see L-canceling as a good example of what I think of when I hear "advanced techniques". It's obvious it's intentional and it's deep enough to continually learn different implementations of it throughout your Smash life.That seems quite arrogant of you don't you think?
In SSBB i guarentee that there WILL be advanced tactics, so when the time comes are you going to try to learn them so you can better your gameplay? Are you simply just a "maurder against wavedashing only"? Or is it anything advanced that you are against?
Let's see how long that takes.Alright, I'll get back to you on that.Originally Posted by Witchking_of_Angmar
Get something to support your claim, and come back. Until then, I've won the argument. At least read my post.
Wavedashers have to learn how to not wavedash?But see, I won't have to anymore. I've resisted learning the technique this long and now my comfortableness with a non-wavedashing game-style is paying off and I'm happy.
And no, I shouldn't be forced to learn how to wavedash to combat wavedashers. Wavedashers will now have to learn how to not wavedash to combat me. Which is how it should be.
So pretty much if it isn't planned, it isn't right?See, I see L-canceling as a good example of what I think of when I hear "advanced techniques". It's obvious it's intentional and it's deep enough to continually learn different implementations of it throughout your Smash life.
Wavedashing has been removed. Why do you think they intentionally removed the means to wavedash?
It doesn't exist.You know, you still haven't provided any plausible proof that the developers said they "intended to remove wavedashing" or similar.
Where is it?
Quote ftw.doesnt matter, i am still going to play smarter than the avergae joeshmoe, and there will still be new advanced techs discovered...peace
-hiroshi
I think the reason directional AD was removed was so you don't have infinite recovery, since you can jump after AD, having it be directional would give every character infinte recovery. And you can jump after AD to allow more freedom in aerial combat, which is what sakurai and his dev team wanted from the start. So the removal of Wd was not on purpose.It doesn't exist.
Do you think they didn't know about wavedashing before they started making Brawl? Do you think they didn't realize what they did by removing directional air-dodging?
See, that's why I don't like arguing about the specifics of wavedashing. It's hard to define where bug begins, exploit ends, and neither of them apply. Should wavedashing be treated as a bug? As an exploit? Or should it be accepted as any "normal" technique?So pretty much if it isn't planned, it isn't right?
See, look at that sentence. It's like you're trying to downplay wavedashing but can't come up with something that doesn't sound like a huge advantage. Oh yes, we're all able to play the game without wavedashing? No way! And all wavedashing does is makes you faster, harder to hit, and more tricky? Well gee.
"You are the one who is not smart enough who thinks that without wavedashing all the pros like Ken, KDJ, M2K and PC Chris will be below you once WDing gone."
Yeah, I think I can beat the pros, that's what I was getting at.
That's a good theory, but don't treat it as fact as you did in your last sentence. We really don't know for sure if they meant to, but you have to at least realize that they obviously knew what wavedashing was and how it was done before they removed directional air-dodging, right?I think the reason directional AD was removed was so you don't have infinite recovery, since you can jump after AD, having it be directional would give every character infinte recovery. And you can jump after AD to allow more freedom in aerial combat, which is what sakurai and his dev team wanted from the start. So the removal of Wd was not on purpose.
What? This is totally irrelevant. Notice how he avoids answering my posts because he knows that my arguments beat his easily.Obviously if you were to find a glitch in Counter-Strike that let you pass through a wall into another portion of the stage, it would be regarded as a glitch. But what if the community embraced it and everyone implemented it into their strategy, thus becoming part of the game? Would it go from "gay glitch" in the beginning to "just part of the stage" later in the game's life?
That little yellow section in your text looks like pee.MINDGAMES/KNOWLEDGE OF THE GAME/EXPERIENCE!!!
Erm...no, you just ignored my post by pointing out that I ignor.....nevermind.What? This is totally irrelevant. Notice how he avoids answering my posts because he knows that my arguments beat his easily.
No, do you?ZombieBite let me ask you something do you think that "Wavedashers" somehow magically got good when Wavedashing was first found out?
Learning to wavedash doesn't mean you were good beforehand, but continue.No they were good before and it just made them find new things to do in their game...
I didn't say that, I was just glad that advantage that wavedashers had over me (by wavedashing) is now gone. The other factors of the battle are obviously there and there are obviously other factors to winning than just wavedashing.it is very arrogant of you to say that "YAY i can beat Wavedashers now!!!one!" when the fact of the matter is many "Wavedashers" will still be very good even without WaveDashing
Think so?wavedashing doesnt give anyone a big advantage
Oh wait, but you compare it to shielding and jumping. Doesn't shielding and jumping give you a big advantage over someone who doesn't shield and jump?[/QUOTE]Its your choice to wavedash or not, much as it is your choice to jump or shield.
But wait, but if it doesn't give me a big advantage then why would I do that?If you think wavedashing is so useful then you should learn it.
I'm not.Also if you are so confident in beating pros without them wavedashing,
Because I would lose.why dont you challenge any of them to a money match and ask them not to wavedash.
Wouldn't prove anything. How many times have I said a non-wavedashing wavedasher could potentially beat me as much as I could beat a wavedashing wavedasher? Wavedashing doesn't equal total dominance or instant victory.it's gonna be fun kickin' your butt without WDing to prove how arrogant and stupid you are acting right now.
1) no i don'tNo, do you?
Learning to wavedash doesn't mean you were good beforehand, but continue.
I didn't say that, I was just glad that advantage that wavedashers had over me (by wavedashing) is now gone. The other factors of the battle are obviously there and there are obviously other factors to winning than just wavedashing.
Exactly. Things that were initially (at least when first discovered) regarded as bugs or exploits before an integral part of the game. Is this right? Is this wrong? We don't have to debate anymore because it's gone.Actually, in all the games I played, as long as everyone could perform something, then it was fair game.
In halo 2, before a couple of updates you could actually grabs flags through walls, however it was fair and not illegal to do so simply because everyone could do it.
I'm just happy I don't have to deal with it anymore. I'm not saying who will win or lose, I'm just saying I have a better shot now that a technique that I don't use (for various reasons) has been taken out (for obvious reasons).1) okay since wavedashing is gone what makes you think that just because one AT is gone which mostly is used for the sole purpose of movement can make you win over these people
Why'd you have to point it out? It's been more fun that way.I think most people are arguing two different arguments here.
Oh sweet Jesus I can't wait for Brawl, and yunno why? Besides the obvious tons of characters and stages and improved gameplay, they fixed some annoying bugs in Melee that allowed people, who exploited them, to have an advantage in battle against those who didn't exploit them.
I can't wait to beat down some wavedashers who can't get a grip on how the game is actually played until I teach them first hand online. They'll be like "but wuuuuuuuuh? i cant move twice as fast and chain simple air moves over and over again into ridiculous combos deeeeeeruuuuuuuuh???"
This'll be fun.