That wasn't deflecting attention from myself because if I was deflecting attention from myself I would not have taken such a hard stance on the Ranmaru situation. I was trying to get it back on track to scum-hunting because what we were discussing was not scum-hunting and it was a simple misunderstanding of opinions which got blown out of proportion.
This isn't true at all, you did deflect attention from yourself, taking a hard stance on someone else doesn't disprove that, it only further proves it because you'd rather focus on others than on yourself. Its also a lie to say what we were discussing was not scumhunting, when I was making a case on you. If I am actively posting reasons as to why you are scum, then you calling it unimportant
is deflecting
Hm? I answered KevinM's question though ._. I didn't say she stopped parroting though I did say she was parroting because she had been parroting whatever I had said at the time.
You really don't respond to my case point-to-point here at all, I said you were scummy because how worthless and fluffed out your answer was. (
check it). You were asked your opinion on the smar parrot, and you successfully answered stating that she was a parrot. What is gained here? Nothing.
I didn't make a big show on defending myself but I did prove where you were wrong on the easy points to refute. You do admit that I did prove you wrong in these tenses in the tone you use I think though idk. Anywho I do hope now I have explained why I disagree with the points made against me. The post you linked to is the one where I am trying to show you where it is a lighthearted jab because it WAS just that but you mistconstrued said jab into a malicious light when it wasn't supposed to be. Last line sits odd with me mainly because it seems you stopped adressing me and instead try and appeal to the audience that is watching our little scuffle.
Once again, not true. If we look at my post
#565 I give a long line of reasoning as to why town J would not act like that, with 4 or 5 points. J responds to this with his #
567 in which all he states is that his post was not an aggressive manner, yet he uses three of the same quote and two lines to respond. This is clear evidence of J ignoring the majority of a case, but making a big deal of disproving the bits which he can - presumably so on the surface it looks as though J has disproved the whole case when in reality he has barely touched upon it
Actually if you could tell from the tone of it, it was completely joking and I think you knew it but you needed more things to call me scum on. I have heard from many people as of late who have said that I am very hard arguer when I am scum and your name was brought up in that convo w.r.t. people who say that's a scum-tell of mine. It was more of an attack on your attack of me because it is mostly meta and nothing really stand outish. Anyways to get back to the rest of this paragraph you don't even give me a chance to defend that statement and say that I would come back and give the illusion of being town. I laughed at the bold statement just simply because it is an AtE. "Townies! Why would he do this?" It also makes your point stronger in an arguement to talk to a group as a whole and it did work. You just made your points clear as of now because I didn't grasp what you were getting at because the way you voted me seemed to make it that you thought I was scum for disagreeing with your logic on the Ranmaru dispute. You will say that this is not the case but I digress. You get a bit radical and emotional by saying that I am making random statements to undermine your attack against you to give more of a reason for people to vote me. Thing is all these tactics work. I am continuously scratching my head as to whether this is scumX1 trying to get an easy ML or the fact that it's townX1 thinking he has "caught" me as scum again after coming in from his DKR lynch of me D1. I'm getting more town from it but I just don't know honestly.
Its a joke? Why are you making jokes when I've just made a case on you? Especially when it does nothing other than distract from your own lynch, that is scummy. I also extremely dislike how you are now using evidence based on a conversation with an unknown person who stated an unverifiable opinion about me. As far as I recall, no-where have I stated that arguing was a scumtell of yours. If you disagree, quote it. Otherwise stop hypothesising like this. Furthermore if you genuinely believe that to be the case for why I am attacking you, then how is what you said earlier a joke, as you so claim it to be?
You even then state that you were attacking the attack on you, why would you do that? If you are innocent then you should be able to legitimately explain your actions, without having to resort to underhand tactics such as attacking the attacker in order to appear innocent. You then go on to mention that my case on you is mainly meta, something which you've already tried to establish, despite the fact that nowhere in my attack on you did I mention meta, and that I specifically stated that my case had nothing to do with meta in
this post. You then attack me again for saying that I didn't give you a chance to defend yourself? What utter lies. You've been allowed a voice, as has everyone in this game so stop bull****ting.
Why are you laughing at me for addressing other townies? Please explain how the following statement "Townies ask yourself, why would a town player make such random statements as this?" is an appeal to emotion. Yes I am talking to the town, that is because in order to get you lynched toDay I need the votes of 6 other players, and in order to get those votes i have to convince town that you are scum. You argue that my points weren't particularly clear, can you point to some specific posts where you see examples of this? Regardless of how clear my posts are, why would you not ask for clarification, as opposed to interpreting them in the way you wish, then responding the them? The second option (the on you chose) only leads to misinterpretation of my argument, and also makes you look like you have defended yourself when you haven't. Please explain how I got radical and emotional in
#579, otherwise stop making unsubstantiated statements.
Why is it wrong if I am giving people a reason to vote you? That's the purpose of a case, to show town how scummy you are and to get you lynched. Why are you even mentioning this?
Why did you say this:
I am continuously scratching my head as to whether this is scumX1 trying to get an easy ML or the fact that it's townX1 thinking he has "caught" me as scum again after coming in from his DKR lynch of me D1. I'm getting more town from it but I just don't know honestly.
If only a few paragraphs earlier you said this:
I think you knew it but you needed more things to call me scum on
It pretty clearly shows you've already made up your mind, if that's the case why would you post saying that you're scratching your head?
