Hitsugaya
Smash Ace
Seriously we know Sion CAN **** and does but when it comes down to it, its not how flashy you do it but when its done.
Sion placed 3rd before this one and Ryan was 4th so what? So 4th is considers not so well? If this is true then shouldn't Roby be higher then Adam because Roby has placed above Adam the last 2 tourneys? (3rd recently [beat Manuel] and 5th at the one with Victoria [beat Ryan]) Sion has his strength and weaknesses. Strength = Can fight spacies really well. Weaknesses = Cannot fight much other then spacies. When I saw Sion play the Doc guy from Victoria he got *****. Not taking anything away from him he is a contender but right now I dont think so.
If being "Flashy" and all that is what makes the PR then Me Ryan Tony and Tiep should be like last place.
Tim is also the most inactive person around here (its not his fault) we all know he ***** and all but I think IMO that he should be dropped from the PR.
I think its really unfair how your rating things as "Player X has placed so good in this tourney and player Y has placed this bad" and then say "Player 1 is better then Player 2 because I think he is still good and CAN still be good." If your going to use one it would have to apply for both scenario or use both not one for this and other for that.
Sion placed 3rd before this one and Ryan was 4th so what? So 4th is considers not so well? If this is true then shouldn't Roby be higher then Adam because Roby has placed above Adam the last 2 tourneys? (3rd recently [beat Manuel] and 5th at the one with Victoria [beat Ryan]) Sion has his strength and weaknesses. Strength = Can fight spacies really well. Weaknesses = Cannot fight much other then spacies. When I saw Sion play the Doc guy from Victoria he got *****. Not taking anything away from him he is a contender but right now I dont think so.
If being "Flashy" and all that is what makes the PR then Me Ryan Tony and Tiep should be like last place.
Tim is also the most inactive person around here (its not his fault) we all know he ***** and all but I think IMO that he should be dropped from the PR.
I think its really unfair how your rating things as "Player X has placed so good in this tourney and player Y has placed this bad" and then say "Player 1 is better then Player 2 because I think he is still good and CAN still be good." If your going to use one it would have to apply for both scenario or use both not one for this and other for that.