Tiep, I don't like that attitude.
uhh.. sorry? You seemed to be acting way out of the normal, so I said what I said.
No hate. Really!
Read the whole post. You completely disregarded what I mentioned about Genesis and WA.
I got tired of saying the same things over and over again about Genesis and WA. About how much emphasis that I can reasonably put on them etc.. I even asked you which tournaments I SHOULD use to consider my decision. YOU gave me a list of tournaments to use. You listed them in "1, 2, 3, 4" format. Genesis and WA was not a part of this. Why would I need to address tournaments not being considered?
You disregarded what I said about everything else. Anyone can pick and choose which fights they want to take and make it seem as though they have it all figured out.
First, what is "everything else"? Also, I will address everything in this post, and you will quickly see how discussion becomes BLOATED. If you choose to do the same, and expect me to do the same, VERY quickly, we will have a thread that nobody wants to read, and that neither me nor you will want to reply to. We will be fighting over details, and the cause will be lost.
As I've said before, if there is an issue I ignore that you feel shouldn't be ignored, please raise it as an issue. I do not purposefully ignore key points.
I'm not arguing "for" anyone. This is something you've yet to realize. I'm arguing "for" whoever has performed best overall, with emphasis on the more recent tournament (this you also didn't care to address).
I suggested that you were arguing for me because you destroyed your own argument.
Once again you contradict yourself. This time within two sentences of each other. Let me point this out.
I'm not arguing "for" anyone.
I'm arguing "for" whoever has performed best overall
Nit-picky?
I hardly feel you are arguing (or at least trying to) from an objective point of view. This in itself frustrates me.
What can I do to make me more objective? There was a stalemate. You tried to make me say something along the lines of "I'm not willing to break the stalemate." I gave into your demand (suggestion?) to use tournament results as the deciding factor. I gave you how I would analyze tournament results. I asked YOU which tournaments I should use given how I would analyze the results.
I don't disagree that there is some subjectivity involved. There should be.
I never set up an Eric vs. Tony dichotomy. Frankly, I feel I'm better than them both,
I have nothing to say to this. I just now feel the need to acknowledge what I've read and that I've not deliberately skipped anything.
but I feel as though Eric has performed best.
Your analysis of the tournament results for the tournaments to consider say differently.
Using the same simplistic evaluation you did for that post, I performed better than Tony at 2/4 tournaments, and in fact, the two most recent ones. Therefore I'm first, right? I don't see you pointing that out, though.
You were not in consideration for first. Should you have been? Maybe. Maybe you should have presented that before. Right then I was trying to break the tie between Eric and Tony. Also, this means you admit Tony is outperforming Eric now?
I'm far from having a breakdown, I can't imagine what you mean.
You were acting quite out of character. It is odd when someone appears to not be themself. I theorized. That was not my only theory.
Apparently only certain people are allowed to make dumb, illogical posts without eyebrows being raised. That in itself says a lot.
You are saying that you purposefully made dumb, illogical posts... I don't know what to say. Anybody is allowed to post anything. People will perceive it differently.
wer u at tony, lose to marth more *****, learn to beat me. Have you noticed that you haven't beat me in singles in months and months (like before summer)? Not even in crew battles.
This was directed at Tony.
One final thing, if you reply in kind, I can tell you now in advanced that I probably won't have the time nor the desire to do the same again.