Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is a comment about something Killer related. While it's understandable to read the entire ruleset, considering that is what is supposed to be done by everyone, why would it be a problem to town, whether killers can talk during the day or not? While I agree it's an uncommon rule, no one else brought this up, not even me. FMPOV i'm town.looking at the deadlines this is a fast-paced game. keep that in mind people.
Frown, why is mafia not allowed to privately communicate during the day phase? that is a quite uncommon rule.
While this comes off as a joke, it is another comment about killers.last part would apply to about every single mafia game though.
<mindgames>
oh well, that means less spam in my inbox
</mindgames>
Just curious, why everyone except Rpsi? Is it because he's the only one who didn't post?FoS: everyone except rPSI
@mod: just call me V (the whole part you put behind it doesn't make it shorter either)
i don't remember why this stuck out, so i'm going to ignore it.lol, Ryker did that in SSBMafia.
Note, V was playing a roleplaying role (he talks in third person). During this dialogue, he got out of that roleplaying entirely and seemed aggrivated instead. The next post after I was ****-blocked by gustave, he goes back into roleplay mode.this would be the opposite of ignorance as I actually thought about the question instead of blatantly saying "yes".
you want my answer that bad? it's yes. YES I KNOW WHO THE DETECTIVE IS.
there. happy?
and Smoth ninja'd me on the rPSI post
yeah that could give him/her awayYou see, the problem is trusting the detective too much, if we go end all be all for what he says, it quietly shows who's the detective. Can we agree on this much?
by the way rei, the post above is my PBP on v
Does people not catching your rpsi post look scummier to you?you just got majorly mindgamed by those first 3 posts. it was about time someone picked on the rPSI thing though. way to pay attention people.
V picked him at random, this was V's way of a random vote (you can't vote everyone except one person)
v made a mistake there and slipped out of his role, hell even in this post V had to correct himself in talking in 3rd person twice.
It would be a problem to call everyone except you scummy since there aren't that many mafia members, but it does annoy V to know that people skimmed RVS.Does people not catching your rpsi post look scummier to you?
I really hate when people use this as an excuse.@DZLE - I can't quite say, at best I'm getting town reads. I'd rather not let Mafia know who I think is town BTW.
TL;DRI really hate when people use this as an excuse.
To me it seems as if you have no ****ing clue on what to say, so instead you use this to make it seem like you have something, while in reality, you probably don't.
We're never gonna get a good lynch if you don't express your thoughts.
The fact that you're bringing this up seems scummy to me. I'm not trying to OMGUS you, but if you haven't noticed, it's not like I'm avoiding the game. I haven't been on SWF at all since this morning (when there was no one else on to talk to) and during cooking class (I was on for 3 minutes on my phone and just skimmed real quick). You bringing up my activity makes it seem like you have nothing to actually go off of. I tend to be as active as possible when playing Mafia.Also, Vrael and Duhg bother me a lot. You can definitly have made more than 4 or 6 posts by now.
Here's a summary of Vrael's staggering 4 posts.
He confirmed.
He said he skimmed, added nothing whatsoever.
Outs suspicion towards Rei for making too many conclusions based on nothing.
Tells people we need to generate as much as discussion today as we can.
Then he leaves himself at a striking 4 posts. What a hypocrite
*out of role*@Guus: Vrael = V?
Yes, but killers have the opportunity to kill every night. We get one killer outed, but at the cost of how many townies+detective? You say -1 townie and -1 killer like detective is gonna catch a killer on the first night and then you assume detective won't be immediately NK'd after.after all he still is a townie and -1 townie and -1 scum is improving ratios for town.
like detective is gonna catch a killer on the first night
pay attention will you?our only way to find killers
duhg, I don't necessarily think that V is saying that the detective is going to find scum on the first night. Even if the detective ends up investigating a townie, it's still a townie. No one in their right mind would vote for said townie, because a) there's no reason for a townie to, and b) obvious scum is obvious. Rather, if the detective finds scum, there's no reason for town not to trust the detective either, since we all know who he is.Yes, but killers have the opportunity to kill every night. We get one killer outed, but at the cost of how many townies+detective? You say -1 townie and -1 killer like detective is gonna catch a killer on the first night and then you assume detective won't be immediately NK'd after.
So, you consider losing our only way to find killers coming to an advantage? Not to mention NKs before detective finds a killer, and then if attentive killer is still alive they can make safe NKs.
vote: V
Could you explain what you meant by this?V thinks ohaiduhg doesn't want to die because the detective investigated him.
I'm pretty sure Gustave already called you on this, but this is utter bull****. Mafia knows who's town, so why would they need to know who you think is town? Seriously. That doesn't even make any sort of sense at all.@DZLE - I can't quite say, at best I'm getting town reads. I'd rather not let Mafia know who I think is town BTW.