2 stock is only a good idea for all-brawl
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The wording was a little weird, sorry.every brawl top 8 match was streamed though. do you mean melee not streaming their entire top 8?
Actually it would make comebacks more feasible because at any given time you can only be down by 1 stocks at most as opposed to 2.Why not both? Because you don't actually see the effects of each when you apply both at the same time
Less stocks is crummy because it all but eliminates your comeback potential after early gimps and such, and that wouldn't be very entertaining. Not to mention you can still camp out 2 stocks over 8 mins when u have to
Shorter timer at least might encourage more aggressive play, and guarantee no Bo3 set goes beyond 20 mins
nah, the idea was correct. streaming all of top 8 was the right decisionThe wording was a little weird, sorry.
I meant that brawl should've been run during melee GF AND every match of top8 shouldn't have been streamed.
The two problems were:I agree it was the right choice, but it was easy to shorten the time. Like if they were concerned about it going too late it was an EASY fix.
No comebacks, no hype. D:If it takes you until the 3rd stock to adapt, then 2 stocks isn't going to bring out your comeback
Yeah dude, sets where the winner is decided after the first stock are pretty underwhelming regardless of stock countNo comebacks, no hype. D:
![]()
1 - Well with foresight it should've been seen as a high possibility that melee would delay the progression of brawl bracket, so maybe 8wayrun streaming brawl was not an optimal decisionThe two problems were:
1. They had to wait until Melee finals finished because 8wayrun was to stream top 8 for Brawl and Melee GF also went to a second set.
2. Nearly all of top 8 went to the final game in the sets for Brawl resulting in far longer sets. There were basically no sweeps.
Neither of these seem to be issues that were avoidable tbh.
ignoring the fact that finals happened at 3:30 am?Yes as efficiently as possible.... What are you talking about???
Brawl was hype as ****, so I don't see the ruleset as a problem at all in regards to the game surviving.
Did you seriously expect the Apex staff to repeat all of their mistakes? Did it ever come to your mind that they could, oh I don't know, LEARN FROM THEIR MISTAKES?I went last year. I'm pretty sure I knew what I wasn't experiencing, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that being here at home, watching it on livestream, was infinitely more enjoyable.![]()
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!http://shoryuken.com/2013/01/13/apex-2013-streaming-live/
Smash was really well recepted by the FGC, check out the comments. Good job APEX. And enjoy this Smash/FGC fusion!
This, more or less.I don't know all of you, but rulesets are not set on stone.
Changing is often not bad, specially if you're changing in order to optimize what you already have.
Brawl can still be hype without taking 18-25 minutes per set
the only issue that occurred with efficiency was waiting until after melee finals were over to stream the entire top 8. that isn't problematic. in every other instance, matches were occurring basically back to back to back.@strongbad Ignoring the fact that efficiency was a legitimate issue?
What a convincing argument!stocks ain't changing, shut up lol
![]()