• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

AlbertaSmash

David is way too cool to be seen with you in public

  • yes

    Votes: 53 64.6%
  • Its true. I am way too cool to be seen with you in public.

    Votes: 29 35.4%

  • Total voters
    82

x After Dawn x

Smash Master
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
3,732
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
I have a brief question that I need every Melee player to answer (concerning Melee monthlies):

Should we run on the traditional neutral system where we choose the first stage of a set via Random? Or should we run on a stage striking system where both players strike stages out of the starter list until only 1-2 remain (if 2 remain, it can be chosen through rock-paper-scissors / coin toss)?

I'm leaning towards stage striking with either the 6 traditional neutrals + Kongo Jungle 64 until only 1 stage remains, or with the 6 traditional neutrals until 2 remain, and then rock-paper-scissors / coin toss determines which one of those is played.
 

Lex Jewthor

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
83
Location
Metropisrael
I have a brief question that I need every Melee player to answer (concerning Melee monthlies):

Should we run on the traditional neutral system where we choose the first stage of a set via Random? Or should we run on a stage striking system where both players strike stages out of the starter list until only 1-2 remain (if 2 remain, it can be chosen through rock-paper-scissors / coin toss)?

I'm leaning towards stage striking with either the 6 traditional neutrals + Kongo Jungle 64 until only 1 stage remains, or with the 6 traditional neutrals until 2 remain, and then rock-paper-scissors / coin toss determines which one of those is played.
wtf is stage striking.

**** that just do random. It's monthlies.
 

Bread~

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
474
i don't even want to state how many contradictions you've made in that post.

i'll be the mature one and not continue this "fight".
It said agree/disagree

so when do you guys want to do this melee tournament?
I miss ShiroDK

Ehh, I'm starting to think about it more realistically, and I would have to organize and time a lot of things to get it to work. Maybe if I can carpool with the other Lethbridge guys or something like that...

It'd be really hard to do, but I'll let you guys know if I can figure anything out.
Well, keep talking to us.

Canada's Cool
Best Shirt.

Is it in Calgary? I may be able to if I can pull a few things together. I'll be able to let you know before Halloween.

I'd need housing, and I would want to stay a day or two extra to make the trip worthwhile. I'll see what I can do. =)

EDIT: Also I got a sweet camera for my birthday. I just have to get some memory for it and then I can record tourney stuff and happenings.
Calgary never does anything.

north coast is for social threads.

this is a social thread.
It's our ONLY thread.

lucky played really well but mango started going on a roll
falcos like that I know personally. you can't give any leeway or he'll take a set
I wish I could DI like lucky, it's really good
Rollout

icy do you have msn?
Seconded.

So I don't know if all of you guys know this, but Aish is going to hold a melee tournament in december.
Is this going to **** over Mike White?

I have a brief question that I need every Melee player to answer (concerning Melee monthlies):

Should we run on the traditional neutral system where we choose the first stage of a set via Random? Or should we run on a stage striking system where both players strike stages out of the starter list until only 1-2 remain (if 2 remain, it can be chosen through rock-paper-scissors / coin toss)?

I'm leaning towards stage striking with either the 6 traditional neutrals + Kongo Jungle 64 until only 1 stage remains, or with the 6 traditional neutrals until 2 remain, and then rock-paper-scissors / coin toss determines which one of those is played.
Can brawl players stop ****ing up our melee?

Stage striking is a big no on my part. a BIG no.
 

victra♥

crystal skies
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
14,275
Location
Edmonton
Slippi.gg
victra#0
Melee is a lot less stage dependent than Brawl so it matters much less, imo. I think we should keep it traditional with just 1 stage ban, and random for first match.

Though I'll be content with either, I don't really care. Just as long as we don't adapt Plank's homo ruleset.
 

Solaris1110

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
384
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
I like stage striking because it just gives another element of fun, while not being any worse than random selection in terms of fairness. Its such a trivial detail that no one should even care really. But hey, i'll totally do stage striking if my opponent wants to do it ;)

man I wish there was a way to prevent text from being converted to smilies lol. they just ain't the same :(
 

Alphicans

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
9,291
Location
Edmonton, AB
Yeah. It makes characters like falcon not able to get ****ed over by FoD, and characters like marth not to have **** advantages on Yoshi's.
 

x After Dawn x

Smash Master
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
3,732
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
lol I love how all the melee players are so conservative and how all the brawl players prefer change

Anyhow, I think we're just going to try stage striking for the first month. Being lazy enough to not spend an extra 15 seconds on stage striking isn't a legit excuse, especially when the first match of a set can REALLY make the difference in the entire set (ie: fox vs jiggs, if the first match is YS, fox will probably win, if the first match is DL, jiggs will probably win).
 

victra♥

crystal skies
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
14,275
Location
Edmonton
Slippi.gg
victra#0
Or Falcon can just ban FoD like always, and everyone can just ban Yoshi's vs Marth like always.

edit: fox bans dl, jiggs bans yoshi's. Also, its not so much that we don't want change, but really. I don't think it's all that necessary, especially for melee.
 

Alphicans

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
9,291
Location
Edmonton, AB
Or Falcon can just ban FoD like always, and everyone can just ban Yoshi's vs Marth like always.

edit: fox bans dl, jiggs bans yoshi's. Also, its not so much that we don't want change, but really. I don't think it's all that necessary, especially for melee.
Yeah but with this, it means they can ban another stage. Melee isn't immune to imbalance, and there is no way you can disagree with that.
 

x After Dawn x

Smash Master
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
3,732
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
edit: fox bans dl, jiggs bans yoshi's.
Okay

So now let's say it's Pokemon Stadium. It's in Fox's favor, Fox wins. Jiggs cps Mute City or Brinstar. Jiggs wins. Fox cps Green Greens. Fox wins.

Or let's say it's Battlefield. It's in Jiggs' favor, Jiggs wins. Fox cps Green Greens. Fox wins. Jiggs cps Mute City or Brinstar. Jiggs wins.

If there was stage striking, it could probably go like: Fox bans DL, Jiggs bans YS, Fox bans BF, Jiggs bans Pokemon Stadium, Fox bans KJ64, Jiggs bans either FoD or FD, so now the stage is either FoD or FD, which is a lot more balanced than PS / BF, and it retains the players' abilities to ban something other than DL / YS (which, if they didn't in Random picks, could end up them getting ***** in match 1, which would probably make them lose the set).

Obviously I'm exaggerating a bit, but the point is that stage striking is more fair and leaves more options open.
 

KillL0ck

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
774
Location
Edmonton
my marth got royally messed up that day lmao also marth is just boring now

i've played him fora long time like 2 years

and he's just boring to play now

thats about it

also snake is fun
 
Top Bottom